Literature DB >> 7086993

Grading errors in prostatic needle biopsies: relation to the accuracy of tumor grade in predicting pelvic lymph node metastases.

W J Catalona, A J Stein, W R Fair.   

Abstract

To examine how accurately needle biopsies reflect the true histologic grade of prostatic cancers the histologic grade of needle biopsy specimens was compared to that of the radical prostatectomy specimen in 66 consecutive patients. Needle biopsies were given a lower grade than the prostatectomy specimen in 21 patients (33 per cent) and a higher grade in 5 patients (8 per cent). To examine how accurately the tumor grade of needle biopsy specimens predicts lymph node metastases in patients with clinical stage B prostatic cancer the needle biopsy grade was compared to lymph node metastases in 78 consecutive patients who underwent staging pelvic lymphadenectomy. Thirteen per cent of the patients with well differentiated cancer, 50 per cent with moderately differentiated cancer and 64 per cent with poorly differentiated cancer had pelvic lymph node metastases. In most cases grading errors did not influence the capacity of needle biopsies to predict nodal involvement. We conclude that although prostatic needle biopsies are associated with significant errors in grading they do provide valuable information about the predominant histologic pattern, which reflects the biologic potential of the tumor.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1982        PMID: 7086993     DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)54132-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  6 in total

1.  Long-term survival after radical prostatectomy for men with high Gleason sum in pathologic specimen.

Authors:  Phillip M Pierorazio; Thomas J Guzzo; Misop Han; Trinity J Bivalacqua; Jonathan I Epstein; Edward M Schaeffer; Mark Schoenberg; Patrick C Walsh; Alan W Partin
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2010-03-29       Impact factor: 2.649

2.  Prostate Cancer - Old Problems and New Approaches. (Part II. Diagnostic and Prognostic Markers, Pathology and Biological Aspects).

Authors:  Kenneth V Honn; Amer Aref; Yong Q Chen; Michael L Cher; John D Crissman; Jeffrey D Forman; Xiang Gao; David Grignon; Maha Hussain; Arthur T Porter; Edson J Pontes; Bruce Redman; Wael Sakr; Richard Severson; Dean G Tang; David P Wood
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 3.201

3.  Pathological correlation between needle biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimen in patients with localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Muhammad A Bulbul; Yaser El-Hout; Maurice Haddad; Ayman Tawil; Ali Houjaij; Nizar Bou Diab; Oussama Darwish
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 1.862

4.  Clinical significance of a large difference (≥ 2 points) between biopsy and post-prostatectomy pathological Gleason scores in patients with prostate cancer.

Authors:  Changhee Yoo; Cheol Young Oh; Jin Seon Cho; Cheryn Song; Seong Il Seo; Hanjong Ahn; Tae-Kon Hwang; Jun Cheon; Kang Hyun Lee; Tae Gyun Kwon; Tae Young Jung; Moon Kee Chung; Sang Eun Lee; Hyun Moo Lee; Eun Sik Lee; Young Deuk Choi; Byung Ha Chung; Hyung Jin Kim; Wun-Jae Kim; Seok-Soo Byun; Han Yong Choi
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2011-03-28       Impact factor: 2.153

Review 5.  Tissue clearing to examine tumour complexity in three dimensions.

Authors:  Jorge Almagro; Hendrik A Messal; May Zaw Thin; Jacco van Rheenen; Axel Behrens
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2021-07-30       Impact factor: 60.716

6.  Hormone resistant prostatic adenocarcinoma. An evaluation of prognostic factors in pre- and post-treatment specimens.

Authors:  A Berner; J M Nesland; H Waehre; J Silde; S D Fosså
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 7.640

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.