Literature DB >> 7083454

Pharmacokinetics of VP16-213 given by different administration methods.

M D'Incalci, P Farina, C Sessa, C Mangioni, V Conter, G Masera, M Rocchetti, M B Pisoni, E Piazza, M Beer, F Cavalli.   

Abstract

Plasma pharmacokinetics of VP16-213 were investigated after a 30-60 min infusion in 14 adult patients and six children. In adult the elimination half-life (T1/2 beta), plasma clearance (Clp) and volume of distribution (Vd) were respectively 7.05 +/- 0.67 h, 26.8 +1- 2.4 ml/min/m2, and 15.7 +1- 1.8 l/m2; in children 3.37 +/- 0.5 h, 39.34 +1- 6.6 ml/min m2, and 9.97 +/- 3.7 l/m2. After repeated daily doses no accumulation of VP16-213 was found in plasma. The unchanged drug found in the 24 h urine after administration amounted to 20-30% of the dose. In eight choriocarcinoma patients plasma levels of VP16-213 were measured after oral capsules and drinkable ampoules. The bioavailability compared to the i.v. route was variable, mean values being 57% for capsules and 91% for ampoules. In one further patient, with abnormal d-Xylose absorption results, VP16-213 was not detectable in plasma after the oral ampoule dose. Steady state levels investigated in three patients after 72 h continuous VP16-213 infusion (100 mg/m2/24h) were around 2-5 micrograms/ml. Levels of VP16-213 were undetectable in CSF after i.v. or oral administration.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1982        PMID: 7083454     DOI: 10.1007/BF00254536

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol        ISSN: 0344-5704            Impact factor:   3.333


  16 in total

1.  Comparison of the human pharmacokinetics of VM-26 and VP-16, two antineoplastic epipodophyllotixin glucopyranoside derivatives.

Authors:  L M Allen; P J Creaven
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  1975-10       Impact factor: 9.162

2.  VP-16-213 monotherapy for remission induction of small cell lung cancer: a randomized trial using three dosage schedules.

Authors:  F Cavalli; R W Sonntag; F Jungi; H J Senn; K W Brunner
Journal:  Cancer Treat Rep       Date:  1978-03

Review 3.  VM 26 and VP 16-213: a comparative analysis.

Authors:  M Rozencweig; D D Von Hoff; J E Henney; F M Muggia
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1977-07       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Activity of a new glycosidic lignan derivative (VP 16-213) related to podophyllotoxin in experimental tumors.

Authors:  H Stähelin
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  1973-03       Impact factor: 9.162

5.  Analysis of the anticancer drugs VP 16-213 and VM 26 and their metabolites by high-performance liquid chromatography.

Authors:  R J Strife; I Jardine; M Colvin
Journal:  J Chromatogr       Date:  1980-05-09

6.  EPEG, a new antineoplastic epipodophyllotoxin.

Authors:  P J Creaven; L M Allen
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1975-08       Impact factor: 6.875

7.  In vitro cytotoxicity of VP 16 on primary tumor and metastasis of Lewis lung carcinoma.

Authors:  M D'Incalci; E Erba; M Vaghi; L Morasca
Journal:  Eur J Cancer Clin Oncol       Date:  1982-04

Review 8.  Podophyllotoxin derivative VP 16-213.

Authors:  A M Arnold
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1979       Impact factor: 3.333

Review 9.  Etoposide (VP-16-213).

Authors:  B F Issell; S T Crooke
Journal:  Cancer Treat Rev       Date:  1979-06       Impact factor: 12.111

10.  Anti-tumour activity of the epipodophyllin derivative VP16-213 (etoposide: NSC-141540) in gestational choriocarcinoma.

Authors:  E S Newlands; K D Bagshawe
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  1980-03       Impact factor: 9.162

View more
  32 in total

Review 1.  The oral route for the administration of cytotoxic drugs: strategies to increase the efficiency and consistency of drug delivery.

Authors:  H A Bardelmeijer; O van Tellingen; J H Schellens; J H Beijnen
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 3.850

Review 2.  Do anticancer agents reach the tumor target in the human brain?

Authors:  M G Donelli; M Zucchetti; M D'Incalci
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 3.333

Review 3.  Etoposide. A review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic potential in combination chemotherapy of cancer.

Authors:  J M Henwood; R N Brogden
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 9.546

4.  Drug monitoring of etoposide (VP16-213). I. A combined method of liquid chromatography and mass spectrometry.

Authors:  H Danigel; K H Pflüger; H Jungclas; L Schmidt; J Dellbrügge
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 3.333

5.  Clinical pharmacology of intracarotid etoposide.

Authors:  N Savaraj; L G Feun; K Lu; S Wallace; W S Fields; T L Loo
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 3.333

6.  Antibacterial effect of etoposide in vitro.

Authors:  W Calame; R van der Waals; N Douwes-Idema; H Mattie; R van Furth
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  Drug monitoring of etoposide (VP16-213). Correlation of pharmacokinetic parameters to clinical and biochemical data from patients receiving etoposide.

Authors:  K H Pflüger; L Schmidt; M Merkel; H Jungclas; K Havemann
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 3.333

8.  A case report and description of the pharmacokinetic behavior of intrapleurally instilled etoposide.

Authors:  J M Jones; E A Olman; M J Egorin; J Aisner
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 3.333

Review 9.  Pharmacokinetics of anticancer drugs in children.

Authors:  W R Crom; A M Glynn-Barnhart; J H Rodman; M E Teresi; R E Kavanagh; M L Christensen; M V Relling; W E Evans
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1987-03       Impact factor: 6.447

10.  Pharmacokinetic study of indicine N-oxide in pediatric cancer patients.

Authors:  M M Ames; J S Miser; W A Smithson; P F Coccia; C S Hughes; D M Davis
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1982-12       Impact factor: 3.333

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.