Literature DB >> 490181

Crossed acoustic response combined with visual and somatosensory evoked responses in the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis.

R E Clifford-Jones, G P Clarke, P Mayles.   

Abstract

The crossed acoustic response, (CAR), a recently introduced test of brainstem function, has been studied in 66 patients with multiple sclerosis and 53 control subjects, and compared with conventional visual and somatosensory evoked responses (VER, SER). A latency abnormality was found in the CAR in 73% of patients, in the VER in 63%, and in the SER in 37%. Abnormalities have been related to the presence or absence of clinically detectable signs. All three responses detected subclinical lesions by showing abnormality in a proportion of multiple sclerosis patients who had no corresponding abnormal clinical signs (CAR 69%, VER 42%, SER 29%). The best diagnostic combination of responses was VER and CAR. Ninety per cent of patients had at least one of these two responses abnormal.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1979        PMID: 490181      PMCID: PMC490309          DOI: 10.1136/jnnp.42.8.749

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry        ISSN: 0022-3050            Impact factor:   10.154


  18 in total

1.  SOMATOSENSORY EVOKED POTENTIALS IN HEALTHY SUBJECTS AND IN PATIENTS WITH LESIONS OF THE NERVOUS SYSTEM.

Authors:  D R GIBLIN
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  1964-05-08       Impact factor: 5.691

2.  Cerebral evoked potentials in patients with dissociated sensory loss.

Authors:  A M HALLIDAY; G S WAKEFIELD
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1963-06       Impact factor: 10.154

3.  Visual and spinal evoked potentials in diagnosis of multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  F L Mastaglia; J L Black; D W Collins
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1976-09-25

4.  Abnormalities of the auditory evoked potentials in patients with multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  K Robinson; P Rudge
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1977-03       Impact factor: 13.501

5.  Myogenic evoked potential responses to clicks in man.

Authors:  N Yoshie; T Okudaira
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol Suppl       Date:  1969

Review 6.  Diagnosis and classification of multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  W I McDonald; A M Halliday
Journal:  Br Med Bull       Date:  1977-01       Impact factor: 4.291

7.  Auditory evoked responses in multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  K Robinson; P Rudge
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1975-05-24       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Evoked potentials in the early diagnosis of multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  P Deltenre; C Van Nechel; P Ketelaer
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1978-05-13       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Evoked potentials, saccadic velocities, and computerized tomography in diagnosis of multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  F L Mastaglia; J L Black; L A Cala; D W Collins
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1977-05-21

10.  Delayed visual perception and delayed visual evoked potentials in the spinal form of multiple sclerosis and in retrobulbar neuritis.

Authors:  D Regan; B A Milner; J R Heron
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1976-03       Impact factor: 13.501

View more
  3 in total

1.  Evoked potentials in the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: a follow up study.

Authors:  W B Matthews; J R Wattam-Bell; E Pountney
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1982-04       Impact factor: 10.154

2.  Pattern reversal visual evoked potentials in Japanese patients with multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  H Shibasaki; Y Kuroiwa
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1982-12       Impact factor: 10.154

3.  Auditory and electroencephalographic effects of midazolam and alpha-hydroxy-midazolam in healthy subjects.

Authors:  M A Hotz; R Ritz; L Linder; G Scollo-Lavizzari; W E Haefeli
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 4.335

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.