Literature DB >> 1576887

Synaptic interrelationships between the segments of the heteromorphic bivalent in double heterozygotes for paracentric inversions in chromosome 1 of the house mouse.

P M Borodin1, I P Gorlov.   

Abstract

Electron microscopic analysis of synaptonemal complexes in double heterozygotes for the partially overlapping inversions In(1)1Rk and In(1)12Rk in chromosome 1 of the house mouse was carried out. A great variety of synaptic configurations with complicated combinations of homologously and non-homologously paired segments was observed. Analysis of these configurations revealed at least five independent pairing regions in chromosome 1. Interrelationships between these regions with respect to their pairing ability were estimated. Pairings in the distal non-inverted segment and in inversions inhibit each other, while pairing in either inverted segment facilitates synapsis in the other. In other words, pairing initiations in different parts of the same bivalent are not independent events.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1576887     DOI: 10.1007/bf00346017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chromosoma        ISSN: 0009-5915            Impact factor:   4.316


  15 in total

1.  EM investigations of surface spread synaptonemal complexes in a human male carrier of a pericentric inversion inv(13)(p12q14): the role of heterosynapsis for spermatocyte survival.

Authors:  N Saadallah; M Hultén
Journal:  Ann Hum Genet       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 1.670

2.  A model for effective pairing and recombination at meiosis based on early replicating sites (R-bands) along chromosomes.

Authors:  A C Chandley
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 4.132

3.  Controlled silver-staining of nucleolus organizer regions with a protective colloidal developer: a 1-step method.

Authors:  W M Howell; D A Black
Journal:  Experientia       Date:  1980-08-15

4.  Synaptonemal complex analysis of mouse chromosomal rearrangements. IV. Synapsis and synaptic adjustment in two paracentric inversions.

Authors:  M J Moses; P A Poorman; T H Roderick; M T Davisson
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 4.316

5.  Research needs in meiosis, mechanisms of synapsis, and chiasma regulation.

Authors:  P B Moens
Journal:  Basic Life Sci       Date:  1985

6.  Evidence for heterosynaptic pairing of the inverted segment in pericentric inversion heterozygotes of the deer mouse (Peromyscus maniculatus).

Authors:  I F Greenbaum; M J Reed
Journal:  Cytogenet Cell Genet       Date:  1984

7.  Synaptosomal complexes and associated structures in microspread human spermatocytes.

Authors:  A J Solari
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1980       Impact factor: 4.316

8.  Positional control of chiasma distribution in the house mouse. Chiasma distribution in mice homozygous and heterozygous for an inversion in chromosome 1.

Authors:  I P Gorlov; Y u Ladygina T; O L Serov; P M Borodin
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 3.821

9.  Synaptonemal complex analysis of mouse chromosomal rearrangements. III. Cytogenetic observations on two paracentric inversions.

Authors:  P A Poorman; M J Moses; M T Davisson; T H Roderick
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 4.316

10.  Further examination of the production-line hypothesis in mouse foetal oocytes. I. Inversion heterozygotes.

Authors:  C Tease; G Fisher
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 4.316

View more
  3 in total

1.  Sex-specific differences in meiotic chromosome segregation revealed by dicentric bridge resolution in mice.

Authors:  Kara E Koehler; Elise A Millie; Jonathan P Cherry; Paul S Burgoyne; Edward P Evans; Patricia A Hunt; Terry J Hassold
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Meiosis in carriers of heteromorphic bivalents: sex differences and implications for male fertility.

Authors:  A H Peters; A W Plug; P de Boer
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 5.239

3.  On the origin of crossover interference: A chromosome oscillatory movement (COM) model.

Authors:  Maj A Hultén
Journal:  Mol Cytogenet       Date:  2011-04-08       Impact factor: 2.009

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.