Literature DB >> 10566358

Evaluating variable selection methods for diagnosis of myocardial infarction.

S Dreiseitl1, L Ohno-Machado, S Vinterbo.   

Abstract

This paper evaluates the variable selection performed by several machine-learning techniques on a myocardial infarction data set. The focus of this work is to determine which of 43 input variables are considered relevant for prediction of myocardial infarction. The algorithms investigated were logistic regression (with stepwise, forward, and backward selection), backpropagation for multilayer perceptrons (input relevance determination), Bayesian neural networks (automatic relevance determination), and rough sets. An independent method (self-organizing maps) was then used to evaluate and visualize the different subsets of predictor variables. Results show good agreement on some predictors, but also variability among different methods; only one variable was selected by all models.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10566358      PMCID: PMC2232647     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc AMIA Symp        ISSN: 1531-605X


  6 in total

1.  Diagnose progressive encephalopathy applying the rough set theory.

Authors:  A Wakulicz-Deja; P Paszek
Journal:  Int J Med Inform       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 4.046

2.  Early diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction using clinical and electrocardiographic data at presentation: derivation and evaluation of logistic regression models.

Authors:  R L Kennedy; A M Burton; H S Fraser; L N McStay; R F Harrison
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 29.983

3.  Artificial neural network analysis of noisy visual field data in glaucoma.

Authors:  D B Henson; S E Spenceley; D R Bull
Journal:  Artif Intell Med       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 5.326

4.  Visualization of clinical data with neural networks, case study: polycystic ovary syndrome.

Authors:  J C Lehtinen; J Forsström; P Koskinen; T A Penttilä; T Järvi; L Anttila
Journal:  Int J Med Inform       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 4.046

5.  The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.

Authors:  J A Hanley; B J McNeil
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1982-04       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Hybrid artificial neural network segmentation and classification of dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging (DEMRI) of osteosarcoma.

Authors:  J O Glass; W E Reddick
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 2.546

  6 in total
  6 in total

1.  Effects of data anonymization by cell suppression on descriptive statistics and predictive modeling performance.

Authors:  L Ohno-Machado; S A Vinterbo; S Dreiseitl
Journal:  Proc AMIA Symp       Date:  2001

2.  Low-dose nonlinear effects of smoking on coronary heart disease risk.

Authors:  Louis Anthony Tony Cox
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2011-10-14       Impact factor: 2.658

3.  Comparison of variable selection methods for clinical predictive modeling.

Authors:  L Nelson Sanchez-Pinto; Laura Ruth Venable; John Fahrenbach; Matthew M Churpek
Journal:  Int J Med Inform       Date:  2018-05-21       Impact factor: 4.046

4.  Adiponectin is associated with bone strength and fracture history in paralyzed men with spinal cord injury.

Authors:  C O Tan; R A Battaglino; A L Doherty; R Gupta; A A Lazzari; E Garshick; R Zafonte; L R Morse
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2014-07-01       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Prediction of mortality in an Indian intensive care unit. Comparison between APACHE II and artificial neural networks.

Authors:  Ashish Nimgaonkar; Dilip R Karnad; S Sudarshan; Lucila Ohno-Machado; Isaac Kohane
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2004-01-15       Impact factor: 17.440

6.  Evaluation of optimization techniques for variable selection in logistic regression applied to diagnosis of myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Adam Kiezun; I-Ting Angelina Lee; Noam Shomron
Journal:  Bioinformation       Date:  2009-02-28
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.