Literature DB >> 7055545

Binocular interactions in normal and anomalous binocular vision: effects of flicker.

D M Levi, A F Pass, R E Manny.   

Abstract

Temporal modulation thresholds were determined for monocular viewing and for binocular viewing of stimuli presented in phase or in counterphase to each eye of observers with normal binocular vision and those lacking stereopsis. The results showed that in individuals with normal binocular vision sensitivity was much greater for in-phase than for counterphase stimulation at low temporal frequencies, but that this superiority declined at higher temporal frequencies. Averaged across frequencies, binocular sensitivity for in-phase stimulation was 40-50% higher than monocular sensitivity. In contrast, in the observers lacking stereopsis the ratios of binocular in-phase/monocular sensitivity averaged 1.02, and there were no significant differences in sensitivity to in-phase and counterphase stimulation. This failure of binocular integration at threshold does not result from differences in transmission time between the 2 eyes. However, while individuals lacking stereopsis showed an absence of binocular interaction for uniform-field flicker at threshold, they showed suprathreshold dichoptic temporal frequency masking which was similar to that found in normal persons.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1982        PMID: 7055545      PMCID: PMC1039713          DOI: 10.1136/bjo.66.1.57

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0007-1161            Impact factor:   4.638


  14 in total

1.  Relationship between critical flicker-frequency and a set of low-frequency characteristics of the eye.

Authors:  H L DE DZN
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am       Date:  1954-05

2.  A comparison of critical flicker frequencies under conditions of monocular and binocular stimulation.

Authors:  F H IRELAND
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1950-04

3.  Binocular interactions in flicker.

Authors:  C R Cavonius
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol       Date:  1979-05       Impact factor: 2.143

Review 4.  Subjective and objective evaluation of flicker.

Authors:  L H Van der Tweel; O Estévez
Journal:  Ophthalmologica       Date:  1974       Impact factor: 3.250

5.  Flicker adaptation. I. Effect on visual sensitivity to temporal fluctuations of light intensity.

Authors:  A Pantle
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1971-09       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Studies of temporal frequency adaptation in visual contrast sensitivity.

Authors:  R A Smith
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1971-08       Impact factor: 5.182

7.  Binocular facilitation in the visual-evoked potential of strabismic amblyopes.

Authors:  P Apkarian; D Levi; C W Tyler
Journal:  Am J Optom Physiol Opt       Date:  1981-10

8.  Binocular summation in normal and stereoblind humans.

Authors:  S A Lema; R Blake
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1977       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  Monocular versus binocular visual acuity.

Authors:  F W Campbell; D G Green
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1965-10-09       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Humans deprived of normal binocular vision have binocular interactions tuned to size and orientation.

Authors:  D M Levi; R S Harwerth; E L Smith
Journal:  Science       Date:  1979-11-16       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  5 in total

1.  Binocular contrast summation and inhibition in amblyopia. The influence of the interocular difference on binocular contrast sensitivity.

Authors:  S Pardhan; J Gilchrist
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.379

2.  Binocular rivalry occurs without simultaneous presentation of rival stimuli.

Authors:  R P O'Shea; B Crassini
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1984-09

3.  Issues Revisited: Shifts in Binocular Balance Depend on the Deprivation Duration in Normal and Amblyopic Adults.

Authors:  Seung Hyun Min; Yiya Chen; Nan Jiang; Zhifen He; Jiawei Zhou; Robert F Hess
Journal:  Ophthalmol Ther       Date:  2022-08-25

Review 4.  The Long-term Visual Outcomes of Primary Congenital Glaucoma.

Authors:  Hamed Esfandiari; Alisa Prager; Kiana Hassanpour; Sudhi P Kurup; Rebecca Mets-Halgrimson; Hawke Yoon; Janice Lasky Zeid; Marilyn B Mets; Bahram Rahmani
Journal:  J Ophthalmic Vis Res       Date:  2020-08-06

5.  Distorted optical input affects human perception.

Authors:  Gad Serero; Maria Lev; Uri Polat
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-07-13       Impact factor: 4.379

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.