Literature DB >> 1303860

Binocular contrast summation and inhibition in amblyopia. The influence of the interocular difference on binocular contrast sensitivity.

S Pardhan1, J Gilchrist.   

Abstract

The monocular contrast sensitivity loss in amblyopia is well documented. We investigated the influence of interocular sensitivity difference on binocular contrast sensitivity in amblyopia. Monocular and binocular contrast sensitivity functions of six amblyopes (three strabismic and three anisometropic) were measured. The monocular contrast sensitivity loss depended on the type of amblyope. Anisometropic amblyopes generally showed high frequency losses. Strabismic amblyopes showed losses at both low and high spatial frequencies. Binocular performance was assessed in terms of binocular ratios (binocular/non-amblyopic). A binocular ratio greater than 1 indicates binocular summation (binocular > monocular) while a ratio less than 1 shows binocular inhibition (binocular < monocular). In all subjects, the binocular ratio depended on the difference between the amblyopic and the non-amblyopic eye. Minimal interocular difference produced binocular summation, the magnitude of which decreased as the difference between the two eyes increased. Further increases in the monocular difference produced binocular inhibition. Anisometropic amblyopes showed a greater degree of binocular summation at low spatial frequencies compared to strabismic amblyopes. Both types of amblyopes showed binocular inhibition at high spatial frequencies. Clinical implications of binocular summation and inhibition in amblyopia are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1303860     DOI: 10.1007/bf00160771

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0012-4486            Impact factor:   2.379


  30 in total

1.  Binocular contrast sensitivity with monocular glare disability.

Authors:  S Pardhan; J Gilchrist
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  Interocular transfer in normal humans, and those who lack stereopsis.

Authors:  J A Movshon; B E Chambers; C Blakemore
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1972       Impact factor: 1.490

3.  The relationship between binocular rivalry and strabismic suppression.

Authors:  E L Smith; D M Levi; R E Manny; R S Harwerth; J M White
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1985-01       Impact factor: 4.799

4.  Psychophysical studies on the binocular processes of amblyopes.

Authors:  R S Harwerth; D M Levi
Journal:  Am J Optom Physiol Opt       Date:  1983-06

5.  Reaction time as a measure of binocular interaction in human vision.

Authors:  R Blake; W Martens; A Di Gianfilippo
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1980-08       Impact factor: 4.799

6.  The threshold contrast sensitivity function in strabismic amblyopia: evidence for a two type classification.

Authors:  R F Hess; E R Howell
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1977       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  The importance of measuring binocular contrast sensitivity in unilateral cataract.

Authors:  S Pardhan; J Gilchrist
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 3.775

8.  Monocular versus binocular visual acuity.

Authors:  F W Campbell; D G Green
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1965-10-09       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Independence of successive inputs and uncorrelated error in visual form perception.

Authors:  C W Eriksen
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1966-07

10.  Humans deprived of normal binocular vision have binocular interactions tuned to size and orientation.

Authors:  D M Levi; R S Harwerth; E L Smith
Journal:  Science       Date:  1979-11-16       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  29 in total

1.  Binocular inhibition in strabismic patients is associated with diminished quality of life.

Authors:  Anika K Tandon; Federico G Velez; Sherwin J Isenberg; Joseph L Demer; Stacy L Pineles
Journal:  J AAPOS       Date:  2014-09-27       Impact factor: 1.220

2.  Effects of anisometropic amblyopia on visuomotor behavior, I: saccadic eye movements.

Authors:  Ewa Niechwiej-Szwedo; Herbert C Goltz; Manokaraananthan Chandrakumar; Zahra A Hirji; Agnes M F Wong
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2010-07-29       Impact factor: 4.799

3.  Binocular combination in abnormal binocular vision.

Authors:  Jian Ding; Stanley A Klein; Dennis M Levi
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-02-08       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  Monocular vs. binocular measurement of spatial vision in elders.

Authors:  Marilyn E Schneck; Gunilla Haegerstöm-Portnoy; Lori A Lott; John A Brabyn
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 1.973

5.  Functional burden of strabismus: decreased binocular summation and binocular inhibition.

Authors:  Stacy L Pineles; Federico G Velez; Sherwin J Isenberg; Zachary Fenoglio; Eileen Birch; Steven Nusinowitz; Joseph L Demer
Journal:  JAMA Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 7.389

6.  Improvement in binocular summation after strabismus surgery.

Authors:  Stacy L Pineles; Joseph L Demer; Sherwin J Isenberg; Eileen E Birch; Federico G Velez
Journal:  JAMA Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 7.389

7.  Decreased Binocular Summation in Strabismic Amblyopes and Effect of Strabismus Surgery.

Authors:  Melinda Y Chang; Joseph L Demer; Sherwin J Isenberg; Federico G Velez; Stacy L Pineles
Journal:  Strabismus       Date:  2017-05-02

8.  A frequency-tagging electrophysiological method to identify central and peripheral visual field deficits.

Authors:  Noémie Hébert-Lalonde; Lionel Carmant; Dima Safi; Marie-Sylvie Roy; Maryse Lassonde; Dave Saint-Amour
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-05-10       Impact factor: 2.379

9.  Contrast sensitivity function of sound eye after occlusion therapy in the amblyopic children.

Authors:  Helen Lew; Sueng Han Han; Jong Bok Lee; Eun Seok Lee
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2005-06-30       Impact factor: 2.759

10.  Binocular combination in anisometropic amblyopia.

Authors:  Chang-Bing Huang; Jiawei Zhou; Zhong-Lin Lu; Lixia Feng; Yifeng Zhou
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2009-03-24       Impact factor: 2.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.