Literature DB >> 7054024

Prospective evaluation of biopsy number in the diagnosis of esophageal and gastric carcinoma.

D Y Graham, J T Schwartz, G D Cain, F Gyorkey.   

Abstract

A prospective trial was performed in which biopsy and cytology specimens were obtained on 202 consecutive patients including 47 with esophageal or gastric carcinomas. The first biopsy specimen yielded a correct diagnosis in the majority of instances: 70% of gastric carcinomas and 93% of esophageal carcinomas. Three additional biopsy specimens increased the yield to greater than 95%, a total of seven biopsy specimens yielded greater than 98%. Seven biopsy and cytology specimens yielded the correct diagnosis in all patients. Seventeen percent of all lesions subsequently proven to be malignant were thought to be benign, endoscopically. This reinforces the belief that all lesions seen at endoscopy should have biopsies performed and at least seven specimens should be obtained.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1982        PMID: 7054024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastroenterology        ISSN: 0016-5085            Impact factor:   22.682


  46 in total

Review 1.  Management of upper gastrointestinal cancers.

Authors:  A Melville; E Morris; D Forman; A Eastwood
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  2001-03

2.  Sensitivity of upper endoscopy in diagnosing esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Richard S Bloomfeld; David I Bridgers; Benoit C Pineau
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 3.438

3.  Is pretreatment endoscopic biopsy a good predictor of signet ring cell histology in gastric carcinoma?

Authors:  Guillaume Piessen; David Amielh; Mathieu Messager; Edouard Vinatier; Emmanuelle Leteurtre; Jean Pierre Triboulet; Christophe Mariette
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Endoscopic submucosal dissection for gastric indefinite for neoplasia: which lesions should be resected?

Authors:  Hyeong Seok Nam; Cheol Woong Choi; Su Jin Kim; Dae Hwan Kang; Hyung Wook Kim; Su Bum Park; Dae Gon Ryu
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-02-25       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  A comparison of flexible and rigid endoscopy in evaluating esophageal cancer patients for surgery.

Authors:  H C Cheung; K F Siu; J Wong
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  Clinical features of negative pathologic results after gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection.

Authors:  Dong Il Jeong; Hyung Wook Kim; Cheol Woong Choi; Dae Hwan Kang; Su Bum Park; Su Jin Kim; Hyeong Seok Nam
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-07-12       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 7.  Helicobacter pylori in gastric malignancies.

Authors:  Abhishek Bhandari; Sheila E Crowe
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2012-12

8.  Cost-effectiveness of endoscopic surveillance of gastric ulcers to improve survival.

Authors:  Jennifer M Yeh; Wendy Ho; Chin Hur
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2010-04-28       Impact factor: 9.427

9.  Predictors of upstage diagnosis after endoscopic resection of gastric low-grade dysplasia.

Authors:  Dae Hwan Kang; Cheol Woong Choi; Hyung Wook Kim; Su Bum Park; Su Jin Kim; Hyeong Seok Nam; Dae Gon Ryu
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-12-06       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Comparison of weight, depth, and diagnostic adequacy of specimens obtained with 16 different biopsy forceps designed for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy.

Authors:  B J Danesh; M Burke; J Newman; A Aylott; P Whitfield; P B Cotton
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1985-03       Impact factor: 23.059

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.