Literature DB >> 16633872

Sensitivity of upper endoscopy in diagnosing esophageal cancer.

Richard S Bloomfeld1, David I Bridgers, Benoit C Pineau.   

Abstract

Esophageal cancer is a common cause of dysphagia and upper endoscopy is the accepted standard for making the diagnosis; however, the accuracy of endoscopy is not known. The purpose of this study is to determine the sensitivity of upper endoscopy in making the diagnosis of esophageal cancer in clinical practice. All patients with a new diagnosis of esophageal cancer from 1997 to 2001 in the Tumor Registry of Wake Forest University Baptist Medical Center were identified. The medical records were reviewed to identify all patients who had undergone a previous endoscopy within two years that failed to diagnose esophageal cancer. The reason for failure was recorded. One hundred ten new cases of esophageal carcinoma were identified, and ten patients had had a previous false-negative endoscopy within two years for a sensitivity of 90.9% in clinical practice. The reasons for the failure of endoscopy were (1) lesion not seen in seven patients, (2) lesion seen and biopsied with benign histology in two patients, and (3) lesion seen but felt to be benign and not biopsied in one patient. Given the uncertain natural history of esophageal cancer, the data were also analyzed using a one-year window; this resulted in a sensitivity of 94.5%. The sensitivity of upper endoscopy in the diagnosis of esophageal cancer in general clinical practice is 90.9% using a two-year window and 94.5% using a one-year window. Understanding the reasons for the failure of endoscopy may allow us to improve the practice of endoscopy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16633872     DOI: 10.1007/s00455-005-0025-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dysphagia        ISSN: 0179-051X            Impact factor:   3.438


  10 in total

1.  Endoscopy and early neoplasia: better but not the best.

Authors:  R Lambert; J F Rey
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 10.093

2.  Diagnosis of gastric cancer up to three years after negative upper gastrointestinal endoscopy.

Authors:  O Hosokawa; S Tsuda; E Kidani; K Watanabe; Y Tanigawa; S Shirasaki; H Hayashi; T Hinoshita
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 10.093

Review 3.  Diagnosis of esophagogastric tumors.

Authors:  R Lambert
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 10.093

4.  Relative sensitivity of colonoscopy and barium enema for detection of colorectal cancer in clinical practice.

Authors:  D K Rex; E Y Rahmani; J H Haseman; G T Lemmel; S Kaster; J S Buckley
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 22.682

5.  Epidemiological differences between adenocarcinoma of the oesophagus and adenocarcinoma of the gastric cardia in the USA.

Authors:  H B El-Serag; A C Mason; N Petersen; C R Key
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 23.059

6.  Prospective evaluation of biopsy number in the diagnosis of esophageal and gastric carcinoma.

Authors:  D Y Graham; J T Schwartz; G D Cain; F Gyorkey
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1982-02       Impact factor: 22.682

Review 7.  Upper endoscopy as a screening and surveillance tool in esophageal adenocarcinoma: a review of the evidence.

Authors:  Nicholas J Shaheen; Dawn Provenzale; Robert S Sandler
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 10.864

8.  Cancer statistics, 2003.

Authors:  Ahmedin Jemal; Taylor Murray; Alicia Samuels; Asma Ghafoor; Elizabeth Ward; Michael J Thun
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2003 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 508.702

9.  Esophageal cancer among black men in Washington, D.C. I. Alcohol, tobacco, and other risk factors.

Authors:  L M Pottern; L E Morris; W J Blot; R G Ziegler; J F Fraumeni
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1981-10       Impact factor: 13.506

10.  Incidence and survival trends of esophageal carcinoma in the United States: racial and gender differences by histological type.

Authors:  M Younes; D E Henson; A Ertan; C C Miller
Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 2.423

  10 in total
  9 in total

1.  Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma - precursor lesions and early diagnosis.

Authors:  Antonio Barros Lopes; Renato Borges Fagundes
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2012-01-16

2.  Improving quality in endoscopy: are we nearly there yet?

Authors:  Andy Veitch; Matt Rutter
Journal:  Frontline Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-02-13

Review 3.  Optimizing early upper gastrointestinal cancer detection at endoscopy.

Authors:  Andrew M Veitch; Noriya Uedo; Kenshi Yao; James E East
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2015-08-11       Impact factor: 46.802

4.  A randomized controlled trial of pre-procedure simethicone and N-acetylcysteine to improve mucosal visibility during gastroscopy - NICEVIS.

Authors:  Peter John Basford; James Brown; Lisa Gadeke; Carole Fogg; Ben Haysom-Newport; Reuben Ogollah; Rupam Bhattacharyya; Gaius Longcroft-Wheaton; Fergus Thursby-Pelham; James R Neale; Pradeep Bhandari
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2016-10-28

5.  Achalasia leading to diagnosis of adenocarcinoma of the oesophagus.

Authors:  Jonathan Segal; Ayodele Lagundoye; Martyn Carter
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2017-06-20

6.  Presence of pink-color sign within 1 min after iodine staining has high diagnostic accordance rate for esophageal high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia/invasive cancer.

Authors:  Jia-Yao Zheng; Ya-Hua Chen; Yang-Yang Chen; Xiao-Ling Zheng; Shi-Shun Zhong; Wan-Yin Deng; Jin-Hui Zheng; Xian-Bin Guo; Li-Ying Gao; Wei Liang
Journal:  Saudi J Gastroenterol       Date:  2019 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.485

7.  Prevalence of cancers diagnosed in Jamhuriyat Hospital, Kabul, Afghanistan.

Authors:  Musa Joya; Zabihullah Stanikzai; Isa Akbarzadeh; Somayyeh Babaloui; David A Bradley; Shakardokht M Jafari
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2020-03-20

8.  Factors associated with oesophagogastric cancers missed by gastroscopy: a case-control study.

Authors:  Foong Way David Tai; Nicholas Wray; Reena Sidhu; Andrew Hopper; Mark McAlindon
Journal:  Frontline Gastroenterol       Date:  2019-07-11

9.  Random duodenal biopsy to exclude coeliac disease as a cause of anaemia is not cost-efective and should be replaced with universally performed pre-endoscopy serology in patients on a suspected cancer pathway.

Authors:  P J J Herrod; J N Lund
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2018-02-23       Impact factor: 3.781

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.