Literature DB >> 7053548

Detection of rectal and rectosigmoid lesions by double-contrast barium enema examination and sigmoidoscopy. Accuracy of technique and efficacy of standard overhead views.

R F Thoeni, A Petras.   

Abstract

The double-contrast barium-enema examination (DC-BE) and endoscopy were compared in 100 patients (126 lesions) to determine the accuracy of each method and assess the efficacy of standard overhead views in detecting rectal and rectosigmoid masses. Seven lesions were missed with DB-BE (accurate rate, 95%) and 20 with endoscopy (accuracy rate, 84%). Lateral and angled rectum views were positive in 74% and 94%, respectively; combining these with supine, prone, and left posterior oblique views, 95% of 121 lesions were detected on at least 2 radiographs. Fifteen of 41 lesions (37%) were missed with the rigid sigmoidoscope, but only 5 of 85 (6%) with the flexible sigmoidoscope. The authors conclude that suspected rectal or rectosigmoid tumors can be diagnosed accurately with only 5 projections, rather than the 11 often employed for the entire colon, and that the flexible sigmoidoscope should be used routinely instead of the rigid sigmoidoscope.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1982        PMID: 7053548     DOI: 10.1148/radiology.142.1.7053548

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  11 in total

1.  Diagnostic accuracy of the double-contrast enema for colonic polyps in patients with or without diverticular disease.

Authors:  C Morosi; G Ballardini; P Pisani; M Bellomi; G Cozzi; M Vidale; P Spinelli; A Severini
Journal:  Gastrointest Radiol       Date:  1991

2.  Flexible sigmoidoscopy in a family practice.

Authors:  M Flotre
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1987-09       Impact factor: 3.275

3.  Limiting overhead views in double-contrast colon examinations does not affect diagnostic accuracy.

Authors:  P J Feczko; R D Halpert
Journal:  Gastrointest Radiol       Date:  1987

4.  Imaging procedures in screening for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  F T Fork
Journal:  Abdom Imaging       Date:  1995 May-Jun

5.  Diagnostic sensitivity of X-ray examination of the large bowel in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  A Brekkan; O Kjartansson; H Tulinius; H Sigvaldason
Journal:  Gastrointest Radiol       Date:  1983

6.  Predictive value of a diagnosis of colonic polyp on the double-contrast barium enema.

Authors:  D J Ott; D S Ablin; D W Gelfand; I Meschan
Journal:  Gastrointest Radiol       Date:  1983

7.  Radiologic spectrum of rectal carcinoid tumors.

Authors:  T Sato; Y Sakai; A Sonoyama; S Kawamoto; M Okawa; A Kajita; H Tanaka; K Nakanishi; Y Fujino; M Fujita
Journal:  Gastrointest Radiol       Date:  1984

8.  Colorectal carcinoma over 30 years at one hospital: no evidence for a shift to the right.

Authors:  S Crerand; T M Feeley; R P Waldron; T Corrigan; W Hederman; F X O'Connell; S J Heffernan
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 2.571

9.  Frank rectal bleeding: a prospective study of causes in patients over the age of 40.

Authors:  P S Cheung; S K Wong; J Boey; C K Lai
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 2.401

10.  False-negative barium enema in patients with sigmoid cancer and coexistent diverticula.

Authors:  S R Baker; D D Alterman
Journal:  Gastrointest Radiol       Date:  1985
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.