Literature DB >> 7053286

Process versus outcome in hypertension: a positive result.

R B Haynes, E S Gibson, D W Taylor, C D Bernholz, D L Sackett.   

Abstract

We studied the association between the outcome of antihypertensive care and three items of that care among 230 hypertensive steelworkers who were referred to 83 physicians. The first item was the decision to treat some patients but not others: 63% of the patients were prescribed antihypertensive drugs and the mean decrease in their diastolic blood pressure (DBP) was greater than that among untreated patients (12.2 +/- 0.84 vs 7.8 +/- 0.83 mm Hg [+/- SEM], p less than 0.001). The second item was the vigor of prescribed medication: Patients prescribed more vigorous treatments had lower DBP (p less than 0.005). Third, patient compliance was related to achieving a goal DBP of less than 90 mm Hg (p less than 0.05) and the product of prescribed vigor and compliance was highly associated with DBP response (p less than 0.0001). These results stand in contrast to those of previous studies that failed to detect associations between various other items of the care process and the outcome of antihypertensive care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1982        PMID: 7053286     DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.65.1.28

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  12 in total

1.  Unmet needs in hypertension: challenges and opportunities.

Authors:  J D Jackson; P Merat
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 5.369

Review 2.  Selective versus nonselective beta adrenoceptor antagonists in hypertension.

Authors:  L M Van Bortel; A J Ament
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 4.981

3.  Reducing clinical inertia in hypertension treatment: a pragmatic randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Amy G Huebschmann; Trina Mizrahi; Alyssa Soenksen; Brenda L Beaty; Thomas D Denberg
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2012-03-16       Impact factor: 3.738

4.  Dose-response relation between sulfonylurea drugs and mortality in type 2 diabetes mellitus: a population-based cohort study.

Authors:  Scot H Simpson; Sumit R Majumdar; Ross T Tsuyuki; Dean T Eurich; Jeffrey A Johnson
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2006-01-17       Impact factor: 8.262

5.  Clinical predictors of treatment reduction in hypertensive patients.

Authors:  J F Steiner; S D Fihn; T D Koepsell; B Blair; K Kelleher; D D'Alessandro; T S Inui
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1990 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.128

6.  How to read clinical journals: VI. To learn about the quality of clinical care.

Authors: 
Journal:  Can Med Assoc J       Date:  1984-02-15       Impact factor: 8.262

7.  Does ambulatory process of care predict health-related quality of life outcomes for patients with chronic disease?

Authors:  Katherine L Kahn; Diana M Tisnado; John L Adams; Honghu Liu; Wen-Pin Chen; Fang Ashlee Hu; Carol M Mangione; Ronald D Hays; Cheryl L Damberg
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 8.  Medication non-adherence in the elderly: how big is the problem?

Authors:  Carmel M Hughes
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 3.923

9.  The likelihood of remaining normotensive following antihypertensive drug withdrawal.

Authors:  A Mitchell; R B Haynes; C A Adsett; A Bellissimo; N Wilczynski
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1989 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.128

10.  Use of management-by-objective for the case finding and treatment of hypertension.

Authors:  D Adorian; D S Silverberg; Z Wamoscher; D Tomer
Journal:  J R Coll Gen Pract       Date:  1986-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.