Literature DB >> 2341919

Clinical predictors of treatment reduction in hypertensive patients.

J F Steiner1, S D Fihn, T D Koepsell, B Blair, K Kelleher, D D'Alessandro, T S Inui.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate that some hypertensive patients under good blood pressure (BP) control can reduce medications, and to identify predictors of successful reduction.
DESIGN: Observational study with 11-month follow-up.
SETTING: Outpatient hypertension clinic at the Seattle Veterans Administration Hospital. PATIENTS: 59 males (51% of those eligible) with diastolic BP less than 95 mm Hg for greater than or equal to 6 months; 57 patients (97%) completed the study. INTERVENTION: Gradual reduction of medications unless diastolic BP rose above 95 mm Hg.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Intensity of treatment with BP medications was assessed using a scale of their comparative "vigors." 35 patients (59%) reduced medications successfully. By the end of the study, systolic BP had risen by 8.2 +/- 12.3 mm Hg (mean +/- SD) in successful patients, while diastolic BP did not change significantly. Two predictors of treatment reduction were statistically significant in both univariate and multivariate analyses: successful patients had been treated more intensively (2.7 +/- 1.7 vs. 1.3 +/- 0.5 "vigor units," p = 0.0001), and they had been enrolled in the clinic longer (5.5 +/- 3.0 vs. 3.1 +/- 2.3 years, p = 0.003). Lower systolic BP, higher urinary sodium excretion, lower compliance, and younger age were significant predictors of treatment reduction on univariate analysis only. Age less than or equal to 65 years had the highest sensitivity (86%) for treatment reduction, while treatment with two or more "vigor units" had the highest specificity (79%) and likelihood ratio (3.3).
CONCLUSIONS: Treatment reduction is feasible in many well-controlled hypertensives, though systolic BP rises. Patients with high intensity and long duration of treatment are most likely to reduce medications successfully.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2341919     DOI: 10.1007/bf02600534

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gen Intern Med        ISSN: 0884-8734            Impact factor:   5.128


  22 in total

1.  The 1988 report of the Joint National Committee on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure.

Authors: 
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1988-05

Review 2.  Confidence in diagnostic testing.

Authors:  P S Heckerling
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1988 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  The role of academic medicine in patient education. In pursuit of hypertension program problems.

Authors:  T S Inui
Journal:  Bull N Y Acad Med       Date:  1985-03

Review 4.  Role of blood pressure in cardiovascular morbidity and mortality.

Authors:  W B Kannel
Journal:  Prog Cardiovasc Dis       Date:  1974 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 8.194

5.  Step-down treatment of mild systemic hypertension.

Authors:  F A Finnerty
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1984-05-01       Impact factor: 2.778

6.  Nutritional therapy for high blood pressure. Final report of a four-year randomized controlled trial--the Hypertension Control Program.

Authors:  R Stamler; J Stamler; R Grimm; F C Gosch; P Elmer; A Dyer; R Berman; J Fishman; N Van Heel; J Civinelli
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1987-03-20       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  The likelihood of remaining normotensive following antihypertensive drug withdrawal.

Authors:  A Mitchell; R B Haynes; C A Adsett; A Bellissimo; N Wilczynski
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1989 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.128

8.  Effects of withdrawing diuretic therapy on blood pressure in mild hypertension.

Authors:  L J Maland; L J Lutz; C H Castle
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  1983 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 10.190

9.  Remission of hypertension. The 'natural' history of blood pressure treatment in the Framingham Study.

Authors:  A L Dannenberg; W B Kannel
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1987-03-20       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  A general method of compliance assessment using centralized pharmacy records. Description and validation.

Authors:  J F Steiner; T D Koepsell; S D Fihn; T S Inui
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1988-08       Impact factor: 2.983

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.