Literature DB >> 7053042

Esophageal dysfunction in esophagopharyngeal regurgitation.

D C Gerhardt, D O Castell, D H Winship, T J Shuck.   

Abstract

Esophageal manometry was performed in 20 patients with esophagopharyngeal regurgitation, in 20 patients with severe chronic heartburn but without regurgitation, and in 20 normal subjects. The purpose of the procedure was to identify possible differences between these groups in upper esophageal sphincter and lower esophageal sphincter resting pressures, and in amplitude of peristaltic contraction in the distal esophagus. The mean peak upper esophageal sphincter pressures in normal subjects and in patients with chronic heartburn were significantly greater than in the patients with esophagopharyngeal regurgitation (101 and 108 vs. 54 mmHg, respectively). In the normal subjects, the mean lower esophageal sphincter resting pressure (19 mmHg) was significantly greater than for the heartburn group (14 mmHg) and for the patients with esophagopharyngeal regurgitation (10 mmHg). The amplitude of peristalsis was significantly lower in the group with regurgitation than in both normal subjects and the group with chronic heartburn. Nine normal subjects responded to intraesophageal infusion of 0.9% NaCl and 0.1 N HCl with a significant increase in upper esophageal sphincter resting pressure, but the group with esophagopharyngeal regurgitation showed no significant change. Patients with esophagopharyngeal regurgitation have lower esophageal sphincter hypotension, diminished peristaltic amplitude, upper esophageal sphincter hypotension, and diminished upper esophageal sphincter response to intraesophageal fluid. We conclude there is in these patients a breakdown of several normal esophageal mechanisms which ordinarily serve as barriers to esophagopharyngeal regurgitation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1980        PMID: 7053042

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastroenterology        ISSN: 0016-5085            Impact factor:   22.682


  12 in total

1.  Functional relationships between cricopharyngeal sphincter and oesophageal body in response to graded intraluminal distension.

Authors:  N A Andreollo; D G Thompson; G P Kendall; R J Earlam
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 23.059

2.  Impaired upper esophageal sphincter reflexes in patients with supraesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  Arash Babaei; Mukund Venu; Sohrab Rahimi Naini; Jason Gonzaga; Ivan M Lang; Benson T Massey; Sudarshan Jadcherla; Reza Shaker
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2015-07-17       Impact factor: 22.682

3.  Upper esophageal sphincter pressure recording: is an oval manometry catheter necessary?

Authors:  W E Green; J A Castell; D O Castell
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 3.438

Review 4.  Airway protective mechanisms: current concepts.

Authors:  R Shaker
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 3.438

Review 5.  Effect of aging on the deglutitive oral, pharyngeal, and esophageal motor function.

Authors:  R Shaker; I M Lang
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 3.438

6.  Pharyngoesophageal interrelationships: observations and working concepts.

Authors:  B Jones; W J Ravich; M W Donner; S S Kramer; T R Hendrix
Journal:  Gastrointest Radiol       Date:  1985

7.  Esophageal dysfunction in patients with mixed connective tissue diseases and systemic lupus erythematosus.

Authors:  F Gutierrez; J E Valenzuela; G R Ehresmann; F P Quismorio; R C Kitridou
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1982-07       Impact factor: 3.199

8.  High-amplitude peristaltic contractions in a patient with esophageal intramural pseudodiverticulosis.

Authors:  R G Murney; J H Linne; J Curtis
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 9.  Gastro-oesophageal reflux--pathogenesis and clinical implications.

Authors:  T R Weihrauch
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 3.183

Review 10.  Modern solid state computerized manometry of the pharyngoesophageal segment.

Authors:  J A Castell; D O Castell
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 3.438

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.