Literature DB >> 7050697

An evaluation of the host-mediated assay and body fluid analysis. A report of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Gene-Tox Program.

M S Legator, E Bueding, R Batzinger, T H Connor, E Eisenstadt, M G Farrow, G Ficsor, A Hsie, J Seed, R S Stafford.   

Abstract

The methodologies and status of the Host-Mediated Assay were reviewed using the published literature available up to June 1980. The Working Group reviewed 274 documents, including abstracts, research articles, review articles, and publicly available contracts and grant final reports. From this group, abstracts and reviews were rejected from critical evaluation. 77 documents were accepted and reviewed by the Working Group and the test results summarized. These selected documents yielded 208 chemicals that were evaluated in th host-mediated assay. Of these chemicals, 133 were mutagenic in this assay with one or more indicators. 76 chemicals, several of which are not considered to be carcinogenic, were not detected by any of the indicators. Of the 208 chemicals, 125 had been tested in carcinogenicity assay in rodents. 90, or 71%, of the carcinogens were detected as mutagens in the Host-Mediated Assay. In several cases, those carcinogens not detected may have been negative because of improper selection of the indicator. The Working Group concluded that the Host-Mediated Assay is an important test in mutagenicity/carcinogenicity research and that, by proper selection of protocols and indicators, valuable information can be gained that otherwise would be overlooked strict, in vitro assays.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1982        PMID: 7050697     DOI: 10.1016/0165-1110(82)90038-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mutat Res        ISSN: 0027-5107            Impact factor:   2.433


  4 in total

1.  Mutagenic activity of the feces of rats following oral administration of tartrazine.

Authors:  R Münzner; J Wever
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  1987-06       Impact factor: 5.153

2.  Genotoxicity and carcinogenicity testing of 1,2-dibromopropane and 1,1,3-tribromopropane in comparison to 1,2-dibromo-3-chloropropane.

Authors:  G A Belitsky; T A Lytcheva; I A Khitrovo; R D Safaev; V S Zhurkov; I F Vyskubenko; L P Sytshova; O G Salamatova; E G Feldt; V V Khudoley
Journal:  Cell Biol Toxicol       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 6.691

Review 3.  A review of approaches to the detection of genetic damage in the human fetus.

Authors:  R B Everson
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 4.  Chemical carcinogens: a review of the science and its associated principles. U.S. Interagency Staff Group on Carcinogens.

Authors: 
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1986-08       Impact factor: 9.031

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.