Literature DB >> 7895155

Genotoxicity and carcinogenicity testing of 1,2-dibromopropane and 1,1,3-tribromopropane in comparison to 1,2-dibromo-3-chloropropane.

G A Belitsky1, T A Lytcheva, I A Khitrovo, R D Safaev, V S Zhurkov, I F Vyskubenko, L P Sytshova, O G Salamatova, E G Feldt, V V Khudoley.   

Abstract

The activities of 1,2-dibromopropane (DBP) and 1,1,3-tribromopropane (TBP) were studied in seven genotoxicity assays, (i) SOS-induction in E. coli, (ii) DNA repair in primary rat hepatocyte culture, (iii) the Salmonella/microsome assay, (iv) a host-mediated assay using Salmonella, (v) the somatic mutation and recombination assay in Drosophila melanogaster, (vi) HGPRT-mutagenesis assay in ARL 18 cells, and (vii) micronucleus formation assay in mouse polychromatophylic erythrocytes (PCE), forestomach (FS), glandular stomach (GS), duodenum (D), jejunum (J), cecum (C) and liver (L). The halopropanes were also tested for tumor formation in the fish Danio rerio. DBP was active in assays (ii), (v), (vii FS) and (vii L). TBP was positive in assays (ii) and (iii), strongly positive in (vii L) and borderline positive in (iv). However, neither DBP nor TBP induced tumors in fish, in contrast to the carcinogenic 1,2-dibromo-3-chloropropane. The genotoxicity and potential carcinogenicity of DBP and TBP in mammals is discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7895155     DOI: 10.1007/bf00756766

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cell Biol Toxicol        ISSN: 0742-2091            Impact factor:   6.691


  34 in total

1.  Long-term cell culture of adult rat liver epithelial cells.

Authors:  G M Williams; J M Gunn
Journal:  Exp Cell Res       Date:  1974-11       Impact factor: 3.905

2.  [Sovol as an inducer of procarcinogen activating microsomal enzymes].

Authors:  G A Belitskiĭ; L M Fonshteĭn; V V Khudoleĭ; V A Demakov; M G Kiseleva
Journal:  Eksp Onkol       Date:  1987

3.  [Somatic mutagenesis in D. melanogaster as an express method of testing carcinogens (N-nitroso compounds)].

Authors:  L M Shabad; E M Khovanova; E G Logvinenko; G A Belitskiĭ
Journal:  Dokl Akad Nauk SSSR       Date:  1976-12-01

Review 4.  Chemical mechanisms of halocarbon metabolism.

Authors:  T L Macdonald
Journal:  Crit Rev Toxicol       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 5.635

5.  Use of small fish species in carcinogenicity testing. Proceedings of a symposium. Bethesda, Maryland, December 8-10, 1981.

Authors: 
Journal:  Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  1984-05

6.  Mutagenicity testing of cyclamate and some pesticides in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  E Vogel; J L Chandler
Journal:  Experientia       Date:  1974-06-15

7.  The relation between the structure of vicinal dihalogen compounds and their mutagenic activation via conjugation to glutathione.

Authors:  P J van Bladeren; D D Breimer; G M Rotteveel-Smijs; P de Knijff; G R Mohn; B van Meeteren-Wälchli; W Buijs; A van der Gen
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 4.944

8.  Patterns of epoxide metabolism by epoxide hydrolase and glutathione S-transferase associated with age and genotype in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  J A Ottea; L G Harshman; B Hammock
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 2.433

9.  Definition of conditions for the detection of genotoxic chemicals in the adult rat-liver epithelial cell/hypoxanthine-guanine phosphoribosyl transferase (ARL/HGRPT) mutagenesis assay.

Authors:  C Tong; G M Williams
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  1980-02       Impact factor: 2.433

10.  [Identification of trihalomethanes in drinking water and assessment of their toxicity, mutagenicity and carcinogenicity].

Authors:  V V Khudoleĭ; V Iu Gvil'dis; G B Pliss
Journal:  Vopr Onkol       Date:  1989
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.