Literature DB >> 7042486

Comparison between cimetidine and Caved-S in the treatment of gastric ulceration, and subsequent maintenance therapy.

A G Morgan, W A McAdam, C Pacsoo, A Darnborough.   

Abstract

One hundred patients with benign gastric ulceration were treated in a single-blind, endoscopically controlled trial to assess the relative efficacy of cimetidine (1 g daily) and Caved-S (six tablets daily). Ulcer healing was assessed after six weeks' treatment, and, if incomplete, after a further six weeks. There was no significant difference between the two drug regimens (approximately 63% at six weeks and 91% at 12 weeks). If an ulcer remains unhealed after 10 weeks' treatment the patient should undergo surgery. There was no difference in the relief of day pain between the two drug regimens but cimetidine was more effective over the first two weeks of treatment relieving night pain, than was Caved-S (p less than 0 . 02). After ulcer healing, drug dosage was reduced (cimetidine to 400 mg at night and Caved-S to two tablets twice daily). So far, 56 patients, 28 in each group, have completed the first year's maintenance treatment, and there have been four ulcer recurrences in each group (14%).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1982        PMID: 7042486      PMCID: PMC1419696          DOI: 10.1136/gut.23.6.545

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gut        ISSN: 0017-5749            Impact factor:   23.059


  21 in total

1.  Toxic encephalopathy due to ingestion of bismuth salts: clinical and EEG studies of 45 patients.

Authors:  V Supino-Viterbo; C Sicard; M Risvegliato; G Rancurel; A Buge
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1977-08       Impact factor: 10.154

2.  Effect of a deglycyrrhizinised liquorice compound on the gastric mucosal barrier of the dog.

Authors:  T J Morris; B J Calcraft; J Rhodes; D Hole; M S Morton
Journal:  Digestion       Date:  1974       Impact factor: 3.216

3.  Complications of carbenoxolone therapy.

Authors:  G J Davies; J Rhodes; B J Calcraft
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1974-08-10

4.  The Veterans Administration Cooperative Study on Gastric Ulcer. 4. The follow-up period.

Authors:  D H Hanscom; E Buchman
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1971-10       Impact factor: 22.682

5.  Bismuth neurotoxicity.

Authors:  J R Murray
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  1978-03-11       Impact factor: 7.738

6.  Factors relevant to the prognosis of chronic gastric ulcer.

Authors:  D W Piper; M Greig; G A Coupland; E Hobbin; J Shinners
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1975-09       Impact factor: 23.059

7.  Haematemesis and melaena, with special reference to factors influencing the outcome.

Authors:  K F Schiller; S C Truelove; D G Williams
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1970-04-04

8.  Cimetidine in patients with gastric ulcer: a multicentre controlled trial.

Authors:  F Frost; I Rahbek; S J Rune; K B Jensen; E Gudmand-Hoyer; E Krag; J Rask-Madsen; H R Wulff; J Garbol; K G Jensen; M Hojlund; V R Nissen
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1977-09-24

9.  Misleading response of malignant gastric ulcers to cimetidine.

Authors:  R H Taylor; N Menzies-Gow; D Lovell; S J La Brooy; J J Misiewicz
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1978-04-01       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  Further haemorrhage after admission to hospital for gastrointestinal haemorrhage.

Authors:  P F Jones; S J Johnston; A B McEwan; J Kyle; C D Needham
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1973-09-29
View more
  10 in total

Review 1.  Use of herbal medicines and nutritional supplements in ocular disorders: an evidence-based review.

Authors:  Justin T Wilkinson; Frederick W Fraunfelder
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2011-12-24       Impact factor: 9.546

2.  Sucralfate in the treatment and prevention of gastric ulcer: multicentre double blind placebo controlled study.

Authors:  A L Blum; H Bethge; J C Bode; W Domschke; G Feurle; K Hackenberg; B Hammer; W Hüttemann; M Jung; G Kachel
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 23.059

3.  The refractory ulcer.

Authors:  D W Piper
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1987-06       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Markers of slow-healing peptic ulcer in the elderly. A study on 1,052 ranitidine-treated patients.

Authors:  G Battaglia; F Di Mario; P Dotto; G Leandro; A Pilotto; M Ferrana; F Vianello; S Vigneri; C V Colonna; R Naccarato
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 3.199

5.  Maintenance therapy: a two year comparison between Caved-S and cimetidine treatment in the prevention of symptomatic gastric ulcer recurrence.

Authors:  A G Morgan; C Pacsoo; W A McAdam
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1985-06       Impact factor: 23.059

6.  The pathophysiology of peptic ulcer disease.

Authors:  F P Brooks
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1985-11       Impact factor: 3.199

7.  Effects of cimetidine on the healing and recurrence of duodenal ulcers and gastric ulcers.

Authors:  M Tatsuta; H Iishi; S Okuda
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 23.059

8.  Clinical markers of slow healing and relapsing gastric ulcer.

Authors:  G Battaglia; F Di Mario; A Piccoli; F Vianello; F Farinati; R Naccarato
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1987-02       Impact factor: 23.059

9.  Ranitidine in the prevention of gastric and duodenal ulcer relapse.

Authors:  E M Alstead; F P Ryan; C D Holdsworth; M G Ashton; M Moore
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1983-05       Impact factor: 23.059

10.  Comparison between ranitidine and ranitidine plus Caved-S in the treatment of gastric ulceration.

Authors:  A G Morgan; C Pacsoo; W A McAdam
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1985-12       Impact factor: 23.059

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.