Literature DB >> 7026606

Clinical laboratory evaluation of the automicrobic system Enterobacteriaceae biochemical card.

J R Davis, C E Stager, R D Wende, S M Qadri.   

Abstract

The AutoMicrobic System Enterobacteriaceae Biochemical Card (AMS-EBC; Vitek Systems, Inc.) was evaluated in two clinical microbiology laboratories. A total of 502 consecutive clinical isolates representing members of the family Enterobacteriaceae were tested in parallel with the AMS-EBC, API 20E, and Enterotube II systems. Discrepancies between systems were resolved with the conventional methods of Edwards and Ewing (P. R. Edwards and W. H. Ewing [ed.], Identification of Enterobacteriaceae, 1972) and Ewing and Martin (W. H. Ewing and W. J. Martin, in Manual of Clinical Microbiology, 1974) AMS-EBC correctly identified 96.6% and incorrectly identified 3.4% of the isolates. When 12 or more isolates of a species were evaluated, Serratia marcescens, Proteus mirabilis, and Enterobacter cloacae posed the greatest challenge to the systems, with 92.6, 95.2, and 95.3%, respectively, being correctly identified. To confirm the accuracy of identification when all systems agreed, 93 randomly selected isolates were identified by conventional methods. The percent agreement was 100%. The reproducibility of triplicate determinations on 93 randomly selected isolates with the AMS-EBC was 99.6%. The AMS-EBC was found to be an easy, rapid, and accurate method for identification of Enterobacteriaceae.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1981        PMID: 7026606      PMCID: PMC271986          DOI: 10.1128/jcm.14.4.370-375.1981

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  12 in total

1.  Evaluation of the pathotec Rapid I-D system for identification of Enterobacteriaceae.

Authors:  P B Smith; D L Rhoden; K M Tomfohrde
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1975-04       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Clinical evaluation of the MICRO-ID, API 20E, and conventional media systems for identification of Enterobacteriacea.

Authors:  S C Edberg; B Atkinson; C Chambers; M H Moore; L Palumbo; C F Zorzon; J M Singer
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1979-08       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Rapid identification of Enterobacteriaceae with the micro-ID system versus API 20E and conventional media.

Authors:  A L Barry; R E Badal
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1979-09       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Comparison of Micro-ID and API 20E systems for identification of Enterobacteriaceae.

Authors:  D J Blazevic; D L Mackay; N M Warwood
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1979-05       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Evaluation of the Repliscan system for identification of Enterobacteriaceae.

Authors:  S D Brown; J A Washington
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1978-12       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Comparative study of three methods of identification of Enterobacteriaceae.

Authors:  I Rutherford; V Moody; T L Gavan; L W Ayers; D L Taylor
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1977-04       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Evaluation of five test-kits-API, AuxoTab, Enterotube, PathoTec and R-B-for identification of Enterobacteriaceae.

Authors:  C E Nord; A A Lindberg; A Dahlbäck
Journal:  Med Microbiol Immunol       Date:  1974-03-22       Impact factor: 3.402

8.  Evaluation of reagent-impregnated strips for identification of Enterobacteriaceae.

Authors:  W J Martin; S F Bartes; M M Ball
Journal:  Am J Med Technol       Date:  1971-03

9.  Clinical evaluation of the minitek differential system for identification of Enterobacteriaceae.

Authors:  P J Finklea; M S Cole; T M Sodeman
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1976-11       Impact factor: 5.948

10.  Clinical laboratory evaluation of the further improved Enterotube and Encise II.

Authors:  H D Isenberg; J S Scherber; J O Cosgrove
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1976-08       Impact factor: 5.948

View more
  11 in total

Review 1.  Automated systems for identification of microorganisms.

Authors:  C E Stager; J R Davis
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 26.132

2.  Comparative evaluation of the Roche Cobas IDA and Enterotube II systems for identifying members of the family Enterobacteriaceae.

Authors:  B Holmes
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Enterosistem 18-R: description and comparative evaluation with conventional methods for identification of members of the family Enterobacteriaceae.

Authors:  R Piccolomini; A Di Girolamo; G Catamo; L Cellini; N Allocati; G Ravagnan
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Agreement between visual and automated UniScept API readings.

Authors:  C M O'Hara; D L Rhoden; P B Smith
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Spectral analysis of biochemical reactions used for identification of bacteria.

Authors:  A E Hilger; M V Lancaster
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1984-08       Impact factor: 3.267

6.  ABAC identibiogramme: prototype of an automated system for identification of enterobacteria.

Authors:  J L Durosoir
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1983-02       Impact factor: 3.267

7.  Rapid processing of urine specimens by urine screening and the AutoMicrobic system.

Authors:  M Wadke; C McDonnell; J K Ashton
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1982-10       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Rapid microbiochemical method for presumptive identification of gastroenteritis-associated members of the family Enterobacteriaceae.

Authors:  D C Yong; J S Thompson; A Prytula
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1985-06       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Rapid method for detection, identification, and susceptibility testing of enteric pathogens.

Authors:  C E Stager; E Erikson; J R Davis
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1983-01       Impact factor: 5.948

10.  Rapid method for identification and susceptibility testing of Escherichia coli bacteriuria.

Authors:  F E Dennstedt; C E Stager; J R Davis
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1983-07       Impact factor: 5.948

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.