Literature DB >> 7025757

Precision of the all-glass impinger and the andersen microbial impactor for air sampling in solid-waste handling facilities.

L L Lembke, R N Kniseley, R C van Nostrand, M D Hale.   

Abstract

A method was devised to determine the precision of the all-glass impinger and the Andersen six-stage microbial impactor over a wide range of aerosol concentrations like those found in facilities which process solid waste. Simultaneous samples were collected inside a municipal solid-waste recovery system, and the data were treated statistically to estimate the precision of each air-sampling device. All-glass impingers yielded colony counts which indicated a linear relationship between samplers over an observed aerosol concentration of 1.1 X 10(3) to 2.8 X 10(7) colony-forming units per m3 of air. Impactors also yielded colony counts which indicated a linear relationship over an observed aerosol concentration range of 3.9 X 10(3) to 1.9 X 10(5) colony-forming units per m3 of air. The coefficients of variation for the all-glass impinger and the six-stage impactor in an environment with a high and variable dust level were determined to be 0.38 and 0.23, respectively.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1981        PMID: 7025757      PMCID: PMC243994          DOI: 10.1128/aem.42.2.222-225.1981

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 0099-2240            Impact factor:   4.792


  2 in total

1.  New sampler for the collection, sizing, and enumeration of viable airborne particles.

Authors:  A A ANDERSEN
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1958-11       Impact factor: 3.490

2.  Improved large-volume sampler for the collection of bacterial cells from aerosol.

Authors:  L A White; D J Hadley; D E Davids; R Naylor
Journal:  Appl Microbiol       Date:  1975-03
  2 in total
  8 in total

1.  Comparison of bioaerosol sampling methods in barns housing swine.

Authors:  P S Thorne; M S Kiekhaefer; P Whitten; K J Donham
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Evaluation of Four Aerobiological Sampling Methods for the Retrieval of Aerosolized Pseudomonas syringae.

Authors:  M P Buttner; L D Stetzenbach
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Impaction onto a Glass Slide or Agar versus Impingement into a Liquid for the Collection and Recovery of Airborne Microorganisms.

Authors:  A Juozaitis; K Willeke; S A Grinshpun; J Donnelly
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Comparison of two biological aerosol sampling methods.

Authors:  N J Zimmerman; P C Reist; A G Turner
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1987-01       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Occurrence of airborne bacteria and pathogen indicators during land application of sewage sludge.

Authors:  S D Pillai; K W Widmer; S E Dowd; S C Ricke
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  Use of solid-phase PCR for enhanced detection of airborne microorganisms.

Authors:  A J Alvarez; M P Buttner; G A Toranzos; E A Dvorsky; A Toro; T B Heikes; L E Mertikas-Pifer; L D Stetzenbach
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  Monitoring airborne fungal spores in an experimental indoor environment to evaluate sampling methods and the effects of human activity on air sampling.

Authors:  M P Buttner; L D Stetzenbach
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 4.792

8.  A study of dopant incorporation in Te-doped GaAsSb nanowires using a combination of XPS/UPS, and C-AFM/SKPM.

Authors:  Priyanka Ramaswamy; Shisir Devkota; Rabin Pokharel; Surya Nalamati; Fred Stevie; Keith Jones; Lew Reynolds; Shanthi Iyer
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-04-15       Impact factor: 4.379

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.