Literature DB >> 7009641

Clinical evaluation of the AutoMicrobic system Yeast Biochemical Card for rapid identification of medically important yeasts.

D L Oblack, J C Rhodes, W J Martin.   

Abstract

The autoMicrobic system Yeast Biochemical Card (Vitek Systems, Inc., subsidiary of McDonnell Douglas, Hazelwood, Mo.), a fully automated and computer-assisted method for identifying seven yeast genera based on 26 biochemical reactions, was compared with the API 20C (Analytab Products, Plainview, N.Y) yeast identification system, using 253 clinical yeast isolates. There was an 84% correlation between the Yeast Biochemical Card and API 20C systems based on biochemical tests alone and a 96% correlation when morphology was combined with the biochemical profile. Of 22 species examined, 14 were definitively identified within 24 h, using only the biochemical tests; the remaining 8 species were presumptively identified, using biochemical tests within 24 h, with definitive identification being completed in 48 to 72 h when morphological characteristics were ascertained. The Yeast Biochemical Card system was both a facile and, with concomitant morphology, an accurate system for performing yeast identification.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1981        PMID: 7009641      PMCID: PMC273789          DOI: 10.1128/jcm.13.2.351-355.1981

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  15 in total

1.  Rapid methods for identification of yeasts.

Authors:  M Huppert; G Harper; S H Sun; V Delanerolle
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1975-07       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Evaluation of the API 20 c microtube system for the identification of clinically important yeasts.

Authors:  G D Roberts; H S Wang; G E Hollick
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1976-03       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Evaluation of the Uni-Yeast-Tek kit for the identification of medically important yeasts.

Authors:  P I Bowman; D G Ahearn
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1975-10       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Evaluation of the API 20C for identification of yeasts.

Authors:  P Zwadyk; R A Tarlton; A Proctor
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  1977-03       Impact factor: 2.493

5.  Evaluation of a new system for the rapid identification of clinically important yeasts.

Authors:  E Segal; L Ajello
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1976-08       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Multi-laboratory evaluation of an automated microbial detection/identification system.

Authors:  P B Smith; T L Gavan; H D Isenberg; A Sonnenwirth; W I Taylor; J A Washington; A Balows
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1978-12       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Clinical evaluation of the Uni-Yeast-Tek system for rapid presumptive identification of medically important yeasts.

Authors:  B H Cooper; J B Johnson; E S Thaxton
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1978-04       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Use of Autobac 1 for rapid assimilation testing of Candida and Torulopsis species.

Authors:  J H Ngui Yen; J A Smith
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1978-02       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Preprototype of an automated microbial detection and identification system: a developmental investigation.

Authors:  A C Sonnenwirth
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1977-10       Impact factor: 5.948

10.  Automated microbiological detection/identification system.

Authors:  C Aldridge; P W Jones; S Gibson; J Lanham; M Meyer; R Vannest; R Charles
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1977-10       Impact factor: 5.948

View more
  16 in total

Review 1.  Automated systems for identification of microorganisms.

Authors:  C E Stager; J R Davis
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 26.132

2.  Limitations of the current microbial identification system for identification of clinical yeast isolates.

Authors:  J A Kellogg; D A Bankert; V Chaturvedi
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Evaluation of the updated Vitek yeast identification data base.

Authors:  M el-Zaatari; L Pasarell; M R McGinnis; J Buckner; G A Land; I F Salkin
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Update and evaluation of the AutoMicrobic yeast identification system.

Authors:  G Land; R Stotler; K Land; J Staneck
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1984-10       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Collaborative evaluation of the Abbott yeast identification system.

Authors:  B H Cooper; S Prowant; B Alexander; D H Brunson
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1984-06       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Rapid identification of yeasts by semi-automated and conventional methods.

Authors:  S M Qadri; D J Flournoy; S G Qadri; E G Ramirez
Journal:  Med Microbiol Immunol       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 3.402

7.  Strain differentiation of pathogenic yeasts by the killer system.

Authors:  G Morace; C Archibusacci; M Sestito; L Polonelli
Journal:  Mycopathologia       Date:  1984-02-15       Impact factor: 2.574

8.  Isolation and detection of multiple yeasts from a single clinical sample by use of Pagano-Levin agar medium.

Authors:  N Yamane; Y Saitoh
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1985-02       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 9.  Uncommon yeastlike zoopathogens and commercial systems for their identification.

Authors:  G A Land; I F Salkin
Journal:  Mycopathologia       Date:  1987-09       Impact factor: 2.574

10.  Comparison of the Quantum II, API Yeast Ident, and AutoMicrobic systems for identification of clinical yeast isolates.

Authors:  M A Pfaller; T Preston; M Bale; F P Koontz; B A Body
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 5.948

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.