Literature DB >> 6386872

Update and evaluation of the AutoMicrobic yeast identification system.

G Land, R Stotler, K Land, J Staneck.   

Abstract

The AutoMicrobic system (AMS) Yeast Biochemical Card (Vitek Systems Inc., Hazelwood, Mo.) is a system which has been designed for rapid and automated reporting of yeast identification in the clinical laboratory. Recent improvements have been implemented in the AMS data base to expand and enhance its yeast identification capabilities. These improvements include the addition of seven biotypes, changes in data analysis scheme, and construction of the taxonomic keys. The updated system was compared with the API 20C (Analytab Products, Plainview, N.Y.) yeast identification system and a rapid conventional method, using 1,106 clinical and stock yeast isolates. With these improvements, the AMS Yeast Biochemical Card had a correlation of 98.8% with the API 20C system and 93.4% with the rapid conventional method and significantly increased its capability of identifying Cryptococcus neoformans (98%). The most difficult organisms for the system to identify in 22 to 24 h were Cryptococcus terreus (58%) and Cryptococcus uniguttulatus (73%). The updated AMS not only provided more rapid results which were comparable to the other two systems but gave a substantial savings in set-up and reporting time as well.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6386872      PMCID: PMC271403          DOI: 10.1128/jcm.20.4.649-652.1984

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  13 in total

1.  Evaluation of the modified API 20C system for identification of clinically important yeasts.

Authors:  W J Buesching; K Kurek; G D Roberts
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1979-05       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 2.  Medically important yeasts.

Authors:  D G Ahearn
Journal:  Annu Rev Microbiol       Date:  1978       Impact factor: 15.500

3.  Collaborative investigation of the AutoMicrobic System Enterobacteriaceae biochemical card.

Authors:  H D Isenberg; T L Gavan; P B Smith; A Sonnenwirth; W Taylor; W J Martin; D Rhoden; A Balows
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1980-06       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 4.  Microbiologic aspects in patients with leukemia.

Authors:  G P Bodey
Journal:  Hum Pathol       Date:  1974-11       Impact factor: 3.466

5.  Improved auxanographic method for yeast assimilations: a comparison with other approaches.

Authors:  G A Land; E C Vinton; G B Adcock; J M Hopkins
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1975-09       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Identification of Candida lusitaniae as an opportunistic yeast in humans.

Authors:  D L Holzschu; H L Presley; M Miranda; H J Phaff
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1979-08       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Clinical evaluation of the AutoMicrobic system Yeast Biochemical Card for rapid identification of medically important yeasts.

Authors:  D L Oblack; J C Rhodes; W J Martin
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1981-02       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Evaluation of the new API 20C strip for yeast identification against a conventional method.

Authors:  G A Land; B A Harrison; K L Hulme; B H Cooper; J C Byrd
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1979-09       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Prevalence of Candida albicans in patients receiving total parenteral nutrition.

Authors:  T Dewilde; C De Vroey; J Bosmans; A Hubens; R Vanbreuseghem
Journal:  Sabouraudia       Date:  1982-06

10.  Systemic mycosis complicating high dose corticosteroid treatment of chronic active liver disease.

Authors:  S H Wright; A J Czaja; R S Katz; R D Soloway
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  1980-11       Impact factor: 10.864

View more
  14 in total

Review 1.  Automated systems for identification of microorganisms.

Authors:  C E Stager; J R Davis
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 26.132

2.  Evaluation of the Microring YT system for identifying clinical yeast isolates.

Authors:  E J Ridgway; K D Allen
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 3.411

3.  Limitations of the current microbial identification system for identification of clinical yeast isolates.

Authors:  J A Kellogg; D A Bankert; V Chaturvedi
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Evaluation of the updated Vitek yeast identification data base.

Authors:  M el-Zaatari; L Pasarell; M R McGinnis; J Buckner; G A Land; I F Salkin
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 5.  Uncommon yeastlike zoopathogens and commercial systems for their identification.

Authors:  G A Land; I F Salkin
Journal:  Mycopathologia       Date:  1987-09       Impact factor: 2.574

6.  Comparison of the Quantum II, API Yeast Ident, and AutoMicrobic systems for identification of clinical yeast isolates.

Authors:  M A Pfaller; T Preston; M Bale; F P Koontz; B A Body
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Evaluation of Abbott Quantum II yeast identification system.

Authors:  I F Salkin; K H Schadow; L A Bankaitis; M R McGinnis; M E Kemna
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Evaluation of the Pro-Lab ID ring system for the identification of medically important yeasts.

Authors:  A S Sekhon; A A Padhye; A K Garg; R Rae
Journal:  Mycopathologia       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 2.574

9.  Comparative evaluation of four systems for determining susceptibility of gram-positive organisms.

Authors:  D Henry; L Kunzer; J Ngui-Yen; J Smith
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1986-04       Impact factor: 5.948

10.  Comparison of updated Vitek Yeast Biochemical Card and API 20C yeast identification systems.

Authors:  J P Fenn; H Segal; B Barland; D Denton; J Whisenant; H Chun; K Christofferson; L Hamilton; K Carroll
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 5.948

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.