Literature DB >> 2229376

Evaluation of the updated Vitek yeast identification data base.

M el-Zaatari1, L Pasarell, M R McGinnis, J Buckner, G A Land, I F Salkin.   

Abstract

Using 398 isolates of yeasts and yeastlike fungi comprising 9 genera and 26 species, as well as the hyphomycete Geotrichum candidum and the achlorophyllous alga Prototheca wickerhamii, we compared the API 20C yeast identification system with the modified Vitek yeast identification system with an expanded data base. We found 11 discrepancies between the two systems: five (1.3%) of the isolates (Blastoschizomyces capitatus, 1; Candida albicans, 1; Hansenula anomala, 1; Rhodotorula minuta, 2) had biocodes not included in the expanded Vitek data base, and six (1.5%) of the isolates (Candida lusitaniae, 1; Candida parapsilosis, 1; Cryptococcus uniguttulatus, 1; H. anomala, 1; Torulopsis candida, 2) were misidentified by the Vitek system. Overall, the efficacy of the Vitek system compares favorably with that of the API 20C in the identification of clinically important yeasts.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2229376      PMCID: PMC268082          DOI: 10.1128/jcm.28.9.1938-1941.1990

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  20 in total

1.  Evaluation of the API 20C for identification of yeasts.

Authors:  P Zwadyk; R A Tarlton; A Proctor
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  1977-03       Impact factor: 2.493

2.  Evaluation of the AutoMicrobic system for identification of yeasts.

Authors:  J J Hasyn; H R Buckley
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1982-11       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Is Candida stellatoidea disappearing from the vaginal mucosa?

Authors:  K J Kwon-Chung; B L Wickes; I F Salkin; H L Kotz; J D Sobel
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  In vitro susceptibilities of sucrose-negative Candida tropicalis, Candida lusitaniae, and Candida norvegensis to amphotericin B, 5-fluorocytosine, miconazole, and ketoconazole.

Authors:  D G Ahearn; M S McGlohn
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1984-03       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Opportunistic fungal infection among cancer patients. A ten-year autopsy study.

Authors:  S Y Cho; H Y Choi
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  1979-10       Impact factor: 2.493

6.  Fungemia in the immunocompromised host. Changing patterns, antigenemia, high mortality.

Authors:  F Meunier-Carpentier; T E Kiehn; D Armstrong
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1981-09       Impact factor: 4.965

7.  Clinical evaluation of the AutoMicrobic system Yeast Biochemical Card for rapid identification of medically important yeasts.

Authors:  D L Oblack; J C Rhodes; W J Martin
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1981-02       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Candida tropicalis: a major pathogen in immunocompromised patients.

Authors:  J R Wingard; W G Merz; R Saral
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1979-10       Impact factor: 25.391

9.  Evaluation of the new API 20C strip for yeast identification against a conventional method.

Authors:  G A Land; B A Harrison; K L Hulme; B H Cooper; J C Byrd
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1979-09       Impact factor: 5.948

10.  Systemic mycosis complicating high dose corticosteroid treatment of chronic active liver disease.

Authors:  S H Wright; A J Czaja; R S Katz; R D Soloway
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  1980-11       Impact factor: 10.864

View more
  26 in total

Review 1.  The ins and outs of DNA fingerprinting the infectious fungi.

Authors:  D R Soll
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 26.132

2.  Polymorphic internal transcribed spacer region 1 DNA sequences identify medically important yeasts.

Authors:  Y C Chen; J D Eisner; M M Kattar; S L Rassoulian-Barrett; K Lafe; U Bui; A P Limaye; B T Cookson
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 3.  Automated systems for identification of microorganisms.

Authors:  C E Stager; J R Davis
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 26.132

4.  Evaluation of the Microring YT system for identifying clinical yeast isolates.

Authors:  E J Ridgway; K D Allen
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 3.411

5.  Efficacy of API 20C and ID 32C systems for identification of common and rare clinical yeast isolates.

Authors:  R Ramani; S Gromadzki; D H Pincus; I F Salkin; V Chaturvedi
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Comparison of the new API Candida system to the ID 32C system for identification of clinically important yeast species.

Authors:  H Fricker-Hidalgo; O Vandapel; M A Duchesne; M A Mazoyer; D Monget; B Lardy; B Lebeau; J Freney; P Ambroise-Thomas; R Grillot
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Ability of RapID Yeast Plus System to identify 304 clinically significant yeasts within 5 hours.

Authors:  T T Kitch; M R Jacobs; M R McGinnis; P C Appelbaum
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Limitations of the current microbial identification system for identification of clinical yeast isolates.

Authors:  J A Kellogg; D A Bankert; V Chaturvedi
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Comparison of the API Candida system with the AUXACOLOR system for identification of common yeast pathogens.

Authors:  C K Campbell; K G Davey; A D Holmes; A Szekely; D W Warnock
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 5.948

10.  Evaluation of the MicroScan Rapid Yeast Identification panel.

Authors:  G St Germain; D Beauchesne
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 5.948

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.