Literature DB >> 6615054

Abdominosacral resection for midrectal cancer. A fifteen-year experience.

S A Localio, K Eng, G F Coppa.   

Abstract

From 1966 to 1981, 646 patients underwent resection for primary adenocarcinoma of the rectum by one surgeon (S.A.L.) in one hospital. The operation, selected by preoperative sigmoidoscopic measurement, was anterior resection (ASR) in 320 patients, abdominosacral resection (ASR) in 175 patients, and abdominoperineal resection (APR) in 151 patients. The operative mortality rate was 2% following each of the operations. Anastomotic complications occurred in less than 2% after AR and in 9.7% after ASR. All patients were completely continent of stool and flatus after AR and ASR. Follow-up is complete in 419 of 427 patients treated from 1966 to 1976. Five-year survival for curative resection (no distant metastases) was 66.2% after AR (129/195), 62.9% after ASR (56/89), and 43.4% after APR (33/76). For patients with no tumor in lymph nodes, survival rates were 73.9% in AR, 75% for ASR, and 59.5% for APR. With involvement of regional lymph nodes, survival fell to 45.2% in AR, 37.9% for ASR, and 17.7% for APR. Pelvic recurrence was detected in 13.3% after AR, 14.6% after ASR, and 13.2% after APR. The authors believe that for midrectal cancer, ASR is the most reliable sphincter-saving procedure. It affords maximum exposure for wide resection of the tumor and safe anastomosis without disrupting the anal sphincters and their innervation. Sphincter preservation can be consistently preserved with no apparent increase in the risk of local recurrence or death from cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6615054      PMCID: PMC1353300          DOI: 10.1097/00000658-198309000-00008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  7 in total

1.  Transsphincteric approach to rectal lesions.

Authors:  A Y Mason
Journal:  Surg Annu       Date:  1977

2.  Use of circular stapling gun with peranal insertion of anorectal purse-string suture for construction of very low colorectal or colo-anal anastomoses.

Authors:  J C Goligher
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1979-07       Impact factor: 6.939

3.  Transanal technique in low rectal anastomosis.

Authors:  A G Parks
Journal:  Proc R Soc Med       Date:  1972-11

4.  Randomized prospective evaluation of the EEA stapler for colorectal anastomoses.

Authors:  R W Beart; K A Kelly
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1981-01       Impact factor: 2.565

5.  Adjuvant postoperative radiation therapy for Dukes C adenocarcinoma of the rectum.

Authors:  S A Localio; W Nealon; J Newall; Q Valensi
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1983-07       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Abdominosacral resection for carcinoma of the midrectum: ten years experience.

Authors:  S A Localio; K Eng; T H Gouge; J H Ranson
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1978-10       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  The results of surgical treatment for carcinoma of the rectum of St Mark's Hospital from 1948 to 1972.

Authors:  H E Lockhart-Mummery; J K Ritchie; P R Hawley
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1976-09       Impact factor: 6.939

  7 in total
  12 in total

1.  Excision of the rectum with colonic J pouch-anal anastomosis for adenocarcinoma of the low and mid rectum.

Authors:  A Berger; E Tiret; R Parc; P Frileux; L Hannoun; B Nordlinger; R Ratelle; R Simon
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1992 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Functional and oncologic results after coloanal anastomosis for low rectal carcinoma.

Authors:  P Hautefeuille; P Valleur; T Perniceni; B Martin; A Galian; D Cherqui; C Hoang
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 3.  Role of pre-operative irradiation for anal preservation in cancer of the low rectum.

Authors:  P Berard; J Papillon
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1992 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 4.  Electrocoagulation for adenocarcinoma of the low rectum.

Authors:  T E Eisenstat; G C Oliver
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1992 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 5.  Analysis of local recurrence rates after surgery alone for rectal cancer.

Authors:  J L McCall; M R Cox; D A Wattchow
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Is transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) a valid treatment for rectal tumors?

Authors:  E Lezoche; M Guerrieri; A Paganini; F Feliciotti; F Di Pietrantonj
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 7.  Primary therapy of carcinoma of the large bowel.

Authors:  V W Fazio; J J Tjandra
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1991 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.352

8.  A 5- to 21-year follow-up and analysis of 250 patients with rectal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  F Michelassi; G E Block; L Vannucci; A Montag; R Chappell
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Total rectal resection, mesorectum excision, and coloendoanal anastomosis: a therapeutic option for the treatment of low rectal cancer.

Authors:  E Leo; F Belli; S Andreola; M T Baldini; G F Gallino; R Giovanazzi; L Mascheroni; R Patuzzo; M Vitellaro; C Lavarino; R Bufalino
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 10.  Sphincter-saving procedures for distal carcinoma of the rectum.

Authors:  T J Yeatman; K I Bland
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 12.969

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.