Literature DB >> 15593468

Predictive factors of stenosis after stapled colorectal anastomosis: prospective analysis of 179 consecutive patients.

Guillermo C Bannura1, Miguel Angel G Cumsille, Alejandro E Barrera, Jaime P Contreras, Carlos L Melo, Daniel C Soto.   

Abstract

The incidence, risk factors, and clinical relevance of stenosis of stapled colorectal anastomosis (CRA) were studied prospectively. Anastomotic stricture was defined as the inability of traversing the anastomosis with the rigid proctoscope. The population studied consisted of 179 patients (94 males) with an average age of 59.3 years (range: 20 to 91 years). The main indication for surgery was colorectal cancer in 59% of the cases, followed by diverticular disease in 23%. The first endoscopic control was performed before 4 months in 25% of the patients, between 5 and 10 months in 50%, and during the following 10 months in 25%. Stenosis was verified with the rigid instrument in 21.1% of the cases and with the flexible colonoscope in 4.4%. The barium enema performed in 12 cases confirmed a punctiform stenosis in 5 patients, 4 of whom had been asymptomatic. An endoscopic dilatation was performed on 5 of the 8 symptomatic patients, with one relapse that required an additional dilatation. In the univariate analysis only the lesser 4-month interval was statistically significant (p = 0.033; odds ratio (OR) = 2.3; confidence interval (CI) 95% = 1.06 to 4.97). Male patients (p = 0.057; OR = 2.08; IC 95% = 0.97-4.44) show a tendency to CRA stricture that does not reach statistically significant levels. In the multivariate analysis, only sex (p = 0.04; OR = 4.11; IC 95% = 1.03 to 5.41) and the time interval (p = 0.012; OR = 2.87; IC 95% = 1.25 to 6.57) appear as independent variables in stenosis risk of a stapled CRA. The incidence of this complication depends on the criteria used for defining it. It is clinically relevant in no more than 5% of the patients. Five out of eight patients in category II were treated successfully with an endoscopic dilatation, while the other three improved spontaneously. Early stenosis, although frequent, is generally asymptomatic and disappears spontaneously. Considering the lack of correlation between the degree of stricture and its symptomatology, it is convenient to combine both the anatomic and the clinical criteria in the selection of candidates for an eventual therapeutic procedure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15593468     DOI: 10.1007/s00268-004-7375-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Surg        ISSN: 0364-2313            Impact factor:   3.352


  24 in total

1.  Prospective evaluation of selective defunctioning stoma for low anterior resection with total mesorectal excision.

Authors:  R T Poon; K W Chu; J W Ho; C W Chan; W L Law; J Wong
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Randomized comparison of straight and colonic J pouch anastomosis after low anterior resection.

Authors:  O Hallböök; L Påhlman; M Krog; S D Wexner; R Sjödahl
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  A new device for the treatment of coloproctostomic stricture after double stapling anastomoses.

Authors:  S Shimada; M Matsuda; K Uno; H Matsuzaki; S Murakami; M Ogawa
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Handsewn vs. stapled anastomoses in colon and rectal surgery: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  H M MacRae; R S McLeod
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 4.585

Review 5.  Large bowel anastomoses. II. The circular staplers.

Authors:  B P Waxman
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1983-02       Impact factor: 6.939

6.  Autosuture of low colorectal anastomosis.

Authors:  S Fasth; H Hedlund; G Svaninger; L Hultén
Journal:  Acta Chir Scand       Date:  1982

7.  Comparison between the biofragmentable anastomosis ring and stapled anastomoses in the extraperitoneal rectum: a prospective, randomized study.

Authors:  G Galizia; E Lieto; P Castellano; L Pelosio; V Imperatore; F Canfora; C Pignatelli
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  Factors associated with the occurrence of leaks in stapled rectal anastomoses: a review of 1,014 patients.

Authors:  A Vignali; V W Fazio; I C Lavery; J W Milsom; J M Church; T L Hull; S A Strong; J R Oakley
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 6.113

9.  Anastomotic stricture with the EEA-Stapler after colorectal anastomosis.

Authors:  J Marchena Gómez; E Ruiz de la Cuesta; G Gómez Guerra; I Vallejo Gallego; F García-Anguíano; J M Hernández Romero
Journal:  Rev Esp Enferm Dig       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 2.086

10.  Colorectal anastomotic stenosis. Results of a survey of the ASCRS membership.

Authors:  M A Luchtefeld; J W Milsom; A Senagore; J A Surrell; W P Mazier
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 4.585

View more
  16 in total

Review 1.  Compression anastomoses in colorectal surgery: a review.

Authors:  A P Zbar; Y Nir; A Weizman; M Rabau; A Senagore
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2012-04-26       Impact factor: 3.781

2.  Surgical outcomes of intracorporeal circular-stapled esophagojejunostomy using modified over-and-over suture technique in laparoscopic total gastrectomy.

Authors:  Takeru Matsuda; Takeshi Iwasaki; Masaaki Mitsutsuji; Kenro Hirata; Yoko Maekawa; Daisuke Tsugawa; Yutaka Sugita; Etsuji Shimada; Yoshihiro Kakeji
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-01-29       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Anastomosis by use of compression anastomosis ring (CAR™ 27) in laparoscopic surgery for left-sided colonic tumor.

Authors:  Eun-Jung Koo; Hong-Jo Choi; Jin-Hee Woo; Ki-Jae Park; Young-Hoon Roh; Ki-Han Kim; Hak-Yoon Lee
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2011-09-10       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Compression anastomosis revisited: prospective audit of short- and medium-term outcomes in 62 rectal anastomoses.

Authors:  Bernhard Dauser; Thomas Winkler; Gerhard Loncsar; Friedrich Herbst
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 5.  Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on Colorectal Anastomotic Techniques.

Authors:  Jana Steger; Alissa Jell; Stefanie Ficht; Daniel Ostler; Markus Eblenkamp; Petra Mela; Dirk Wilhelm
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2022-05-04       Impact factor: 2.755

6.  Colorectal anastomotic stricture: is it associated with inadequate colonic mobilization?

Authors:  A Hiranyakas; G Da Silva; P Denoya; S Shawki; S D Wexner
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2012-11-15       Impact factor: 3.781

7.  Stenosis after use of the double-stapling technique for reconstruction after laparoscopy-assisted total gastrectomy.

Authors:  Toru Zuiki; Yoshinori Hosoya; Yuji Kaneda; Kentaro Kurashina; Shin Saito; Takashi Ui; Hidenori Haruta; Masanobu Hyodo; Naohiro Sata; Alan T Lefor; Yoshikazu Yasuda
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-04-10       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Niti CAR 27 Versus a Conventional End-to-End Anastomosis Stapler in a Laparoscopic Anterior Resection for Sigmoid Colon Cancer.

Authors:  Seung-Jin Kwag; Jun-Gi Kim; Won-Kyung Kang; Jin-Kwon Lee; Seong-Taek Oh
Journal:  Ann Coloproctol       Date:  2014-04-25

Review 9.  Large Bowel Obstruction.

Authors:  Wali R Johnson; Alexander T Hawkins
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2021-07-20

10.  Preoperative radiotherapy for patients with rectal cancer: a risk factor for non-reversal of ileostomy caused by stenosis or stiffness proximal to colorectal anastomosis.

Authors:  Hongbo Zhu; Bingjun Bai; Lina Shan; Xiaowei Wang; Min Chen; Weifang Mao; Xuefeng Huang
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-09-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.