Literature DB >> 6991523

Rapid semiautomated screening and processing of urine specimens.

R D Jenkins, D C Hale, J M Matsen.   

Abstract

A rapid urine culture procedure was evaluated in which positive urines were detected by using light-scatter photometry (Autobac). Specimens were analyzed at 3, 5, and 6 h. Specimens detected as positive at 3 h were then further evaluated by a direct 3-h susceptibility procedure (Autobac) and by a 4-h identification procedure (Micro-ID). Of 949 specimens, 175 had >10(5) colony-forming units per ml by colony count. Of these latter specimens, 75.4% had been detected by 3 h, and 95.4% were detected by 6 h. Of specimens positive by Autobac at 3 h, 96% (95.7%) had >10(5) colony-forming units per ml. If pure by Gram stain, those positive specimens were inoculated to direct susceptibility and identification systems. When direct Autobac susceptibilities were compared with the standard Autobac method done from the plate the following day, discrepancy rates were 1.3% very major, 2.1% major, and 7.4% total. The direct identifications were 94% (94.2%) correct when using the Micro-ID manual and a collection of octal patterns unique to this system, in which urine/broth culture inoculum was employed instead of the usual organism colony suspension. Those urine specimens negative after screening at 3 h were evaluated at 5 and 6 h, and an additional 126 specimens were detected as positive. These were then processed by routine plate inoculation, due to the limitations of the work day. By 6 h, 95.4% of specimens with >10(5) colony-forming units per ml were detected. The 4.6% false-negative results consisted of patients on antibiotics, or slowly growing bacteria suspected of being distal urethral contaminants. Thus, 83.5% of the urine cultures received by 9:00 a.m. (10.6% 3-h positives and 72.9% negative at 6 h) could be evaluated and reported within one 8-h work day.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1980        PMID: 6991523      PMCID: PMC273367          DOI: 10.1128/jcm.11.3.220-225.1980

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  4 in total

1.  Laboratory evaluation of a rapid, automatic susceptibility testing system: report of a collaborative study.

Authors:  C Thornsberry; T L Gavan; J C Sherris; A Balows; J M Matsen; L D Sabath; F Schoenknecht; L D Thrupp; J A Washington
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1975-04       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Bacteriuria and the diagnosis of infections of the urinary tract; with observations on the use of methionine as a urinary antiseptic.

Authors:  E H KASS
Journal:  AMA Arch Intern Med       Date:  1957-11

3.  Visual acuity following binocular deprivation in the cat.

Authors:  D C Smith; R Lorber; L R Stanford; M S Loop
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1980-02-03       Impact factor: 3.252

4.  Comparison of micro-ID, API 20E, and conventional media systems in identification of Enterobacteriaceae.

Authors:  K E Aldridge; B B Gardner; S J Clark; J M Matsen
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1978-06       Impact factor: 5.948

  4 in total
  20 in total

1.  Direct identification and susceptibility testing by the AutoMicrobic system of gram-negative bacilli from urine specimens.

Authors:  S A Wellstood
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1986-06       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Rapid diagnosis of gram negative urinary infections: identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing in 24 hours.

Authors:  C M Dupeyron; G A Guillemin; G J Leluan
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1986-02       Impact factor: 3.411

3.  Evaluation of leukocyte esterase activity as a rapid screening technique for bacteriuria.

Authors:  J L Perry; J S Matthews; D E Weesner
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1982-05       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Evaluation of a two-minute test for urine screening.

Authors:  M T Pezzlo; M A Wetkowski; E M Peterson; L M de la Maza
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Evaluation of the MS-2 urine screening system.

Authors:  J A Smith; J Ngui-Yen
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Evaluation of the MS-2 urine screening method for detection of bacteriuria.

Authors:  L R McCarthy; T L Gavan; J Robson; C Corlett
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1982-08       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Analysis of the disagreement between automated bioluminescence-based and culture methods for detecting significant bacteriuria, with proposals for standardizing evaluations of bacteriuria detection methods.

Authors:  W W Nichols; G D Curtis; H H Johnston
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1982-05       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Evaluation of a commercially available semi-automated bioluminescence system for bacteriuria screening.

Authors:  P W McWalter; C A Sharp
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1982-08       Impact factor: 3.267

9.  Evaluation of Gram-stain screen and Micro-ID methods for direct identification of Enterobacteriaceae from urines.

Authors:  P C Appelbaum; C C Olmstead
Journal:  Med Microbiol Immunol       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 3.402

10.  Use of the Bac-T-Screen to predict bacteriuria from urine specimens held at room temperature.

Authors:  D N Wright; B Saxon; J M Matsen
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1986-08       Impact factor: 5.948

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.