Literature DB >> 6985214

Comparison of microscopic and cultural findings in the diagnosis of Gardnerella vaginalis infection.

D Milatovic, K Machka, R V Brosch, H J Wallner, I Braveny.   

Abstract

The diagnosis of Gardnerella vaginalis infection on the basis of microscopic and cultural findings was compared. A total of 340 specimens of vaginal secretion were Gram stained and plated on a medium selective for Gardnerella vaginalis. Positive culture was obtained in 165 cases. Microscopy was unequivocally positive in 95, doubtful in 58 and negative in 187. Positive microscopy was confirmed by culture in 99%. On the other hand, 21% of the negative microscopy results gave a false negative diagnosis. Specimens for which microscopy was doubtful were culture positive in 53% of the cases, including 12% with heavy growth. Thus, positive microscopy proved to be sufficient for a reliable diagnosis of Gardnerella vaginalis infection. However, in specimens with negative or doubtful microscopic findings, additional culture is recommended.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1982        PMID: 6985214     DOI: 10.1007/BF02019974

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0722-2211            Impact factor:   3.267


  16 in total

1.  CLINICAL AND LABORATORY EFFECTS OF METRONIDAZOLE.

Authors:  H L GARDNER; C D DUKES
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1964-08-15       Impact factor: 8.661

2.  IS HAEMOPHILUS VAGINALIS A PATHOGEN IN THE FEMALE GENITAL TRACT?

Authors:  J FRAMPTON; Y LEE
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol Br Commonw       Date:  1964-06

3.  DIAGNOSIS OF HEMOPHILUS VAGINALIS VAGINITIS BY GRAM-STAINED SMEARS.

Authors:  W E DUNKELBERG
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1965-04-01       Impact factor: 8.661

4.  A study and new description of Corynebacterium vaginale (Haemophilus vaginalis).

Authors:  W E Dunkelberg; R Skaggs; D S Kellogg
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  1970-03       Impact factor: 2.493

5.  Comparisons between direct microscopic and cultural methods for recognition of Corynebacterium vaginale in women with vaginitis.

Authors:  R F Smith; H A Rodgers; P A Hines; R M Ray
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1977-03       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Nonspecific vaginitis: role of Haemophilus vaginalis and treatment with metronidazole.

Authors:  T A Pheifer; P S Forsyth; M A Durfee; H M Pollock; K K Holmes
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1978-06-29       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Isolation and identification of Corynebacterium vaginale (Haemophilus vaginalis) in women with infections of the lower genital tract.

Authors:  M Akerlund; P A Mårdh
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  1974       Impact factor: 3.636

8.  Haemophilus vaginalis (Corynebacterium vaginale, Gardnerella vaginalis) in a family planning clinic population.

Authors:  H M Bramley; R A Dixon; B M Jones
Journal:  Br J Vener Dis       Date:  1981-02

9.  Comparison of culture and microscopy in the diagnosis of Gardnerella vaginalis infection.

Authors:  C A Ison; S G Dawson; J Hilton; G W Csonka; C S Easmon
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1982-05       Impact factor: 3.411

10.  Selective differential human blood bilayer media for isolation of Gardnerella (Haemophilus) vaginalis.

Authors:  P A Totten; R Amsel; J Hale; P Piot; K K Holmes
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1982-01       Impact factor: 5.948

View more
  1 in total

1.  Reproducibility of interpretation of Gram-stained vaginal smears for the diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis.

Authors:  T Mazzulli; A E Simor; D E Low
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 5.948

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.