Literature DB >> 2380377

Reproducibility of interpretation of Gram-stained vaginal smears for the diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis.

T Mazzulli1, A E Simor, D E Low.   

Abstract

In the diagnostic microbiology laboratory, interpretation of Gram-stained slides of vaginal swab specimens is used to support the clinical diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis. The reproducibility with which technologists interpret these Gram-stained slides was evaluated by presenting, in coded fashion, 80 original slides and 80 duplicate slides of vaginal swab specimens to three technologists. They each interpreted the original slide twice and the duplicate slide from the same specimen once. Intraobserver and interobserver agreement was assessed by use of the weighted kappa statistic. Semiquantitation of Lactobacillus and Gardnerella morphotypes and a diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis showed the greatest intraobserver agreement, with kappa values ranging from 0.772 to 1.000. Interobserver agreement was also high for rating Lactobacillus morphotypes and clue cells (kappa values between 0.735 and 0.869) but decreased slightly for Gardnerella morphotypes and a diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis (kappa values between 0.656 and 0.800). These results indicate that there is good agreement for the interpretation of Gram-stained slides of vaginal swab specimens and that this method alone, without culture, can be used reliably to support the clinical diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2380377      PMCID: PMC267978          DOI: 10.1128/jcm.28.7.1506-1508.1990

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  17 in total

1.  Hemophilus vaginalis vaginitis.

Authors:  H L GARDNER; C D DUKES
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  1959-11-18       Impact factor: 5.691

2.  Quality assurance of gram-stained direct smears.

Authors:  R C Bartlett; J Tetreault; J Evers; J Officer; J Derench
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  1979-12       Impact factor: 2.493

3.  Clinical biostatistics. LIV. The biostatistics of concordance.

Authors:  M S Kramer; A R Feinstein
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1981-01       Impact factor: 6.875

Review 4.  An overview of the diagnosis and treatment of Gardnerella vaginalis and Bacteroides associated vaginitis.

Authors:  B M Jones; G R Kinghorn; B I Duerden
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1982-10       Impact factor: 3.267

5.  Comparison of microscopic and cultural findings in the diagnosis of Gardnerella vaginalis infection.

Authors:  D Milatovic; K Machka; R V Brosch; H J Wallner; I Braveny
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1982-10       Impact factor: 3.267

6.  Anaerobic vaginosis (non-specific vaginitis): clinical, microbiological, and therapeutic findings.

Authors:  A L Blackwell; A R Fox; I Phillips; D Barlow
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1983-12-17       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  The vaginal microbial flora in non-specific vaginitis.

Authors:  P Piot; E Van Dyck; P Godts; J Vanderheyden
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1982-10       Impact factor: 3.267

8.  Curved anaerobic bacteria in bacterial (nonspecific) vaginosis and their response to antimicrobial therapy.

Authors:  C A Spiegel; D A Eschenbach; R Amsel; K K Holmes
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  1983-11       Impact factor: 5.226

9.  Nonspecific vaginitis. Diagnostic criteria and microbial and epidemiologic associations.

Authors:  R Amsel; P A Totten; C A Spiegel; K C Chen; D Eschenbach; K K Holmes
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1983-01       Impact factor: 4.965

10.  Diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis by direct gram stain of vaginal fluid.

Authors:  C A Spiegel; R Amsel; K K Holmes
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1983-07       Impact factor: 5.948

View more
  9 in total

1.  Reproducibility of a scoring system for gram stain diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis.

Authors:  M R Joesoef; S L Hillier; S Josodiwondo; M Linnan
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 2.  Bacterial vaginosis.

Authors:  C A Spiegel
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 26.132

3.  Evaluation of accuracy and reproducibility of E test for susceptibility testing of Streptococcus pneumoniae to penicillin, cefotaxime, and ceftriaxone.

Authors:  M Skulnick; G W Small; P Lo; M P Patel; C R Porter; D E Low; S Matsumura; T Mazzulli
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Reliability of diagnosing bacterial vaginosis is improved by a standardized method of gram stain interpretation.

Authors:  R P Nugent; M A Krohn; S L Hillier
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Assessment of two alternative sample transport and fixation methods in the microbiological diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis.

Authors:  Erica Eason; Baldwin Toye; George A Wells; Mary Senterman
Journal:  Can J Infect Dis       Date:  2003-11

Review 6.  Gardnerella vaginalis: characteristics, clinical considerations, and controversies.

Authors:  B W Catlin
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 26.132

7.  Gram stain method shows better sensitivity than clinical criteria for detection of bacterial vaginosis in surveillance of pregnant, low-income women in a clinical setting.

Authors:  M T Tam; M Yungbluth; T Myles
Journal:  Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1998

8.  Vaginal discharge: The diagnostic enigma.

Authors:  Shaheen Siddiqua Amrin; G Jyothi Lakshmi
Journal:  Indian J Sex Transm Dis AIDS       Date:  2020-07-31

9.  Role of bacterial vaginosis in peripartum infections.

Authors:  P Clark; T Kurtzer; P Duff
Journal:  Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1994
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.