Literature DB >> 300740

Comparisons between direct microscopic and cultural methods for recognition of Corynebacterium vaginale in women with vaginitis.

R F Smith, H A Rodgers, P A Hines, R M Ray.   

Abstract

The frequency with which clue cells could be detected in Gram-stained vaginal smears and/or cervical Papanicolaou (Pap) smears was compared with the frequency of Corynebacterium vaginale (Haemophilus vaginalis) isolation in a group of 236 female patients, of whom 221 had vaginitis. Vaginal clue cells were found most often in women from whom C. vaginale was isolated (P = 0.00006) whereas, conversely, clue cells in cervical Pap smears were reported more frequently in women with negative cultures for this organism (P = 0.006). C. vaginale isolations were made more frequently from women with both vaginal and cervical clue cells reported (P = 0.000088). However, the combined false positive-false negative vaginal clue cell rate in the patients studied was 36.5%. Neither the detection of vaginal clue cells nor the isolation of C. vaginale was significantly affected by whether or not patients had trichomoniasis (P = 0.25). Trichomonas vaginalis detection in cervical Pap smears and vaginal isolation were related (P = 0.00005), whereas the same relationship was not significant for fungi (P = greater than 0.05).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1977        PMID: 300740      PMCID: PMC274580          DOI: 10.1128/jcm.5.3.268-272.1977

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  12 in total

Review 1.  Trichomoniasis, candidiasis, and the minor venereal diseases.

Authors:  M F Rein; T A Chapel
Journal:  Clin Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1975-03       Impact factor: 2.190

2.  Obligately anaerobic strains of Corynebacterium vaginale (Haemophilus vaginalis).

Authors:  B H Malone; M Schreiber; N J Schneider; L V Holdeman
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1975-09       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  CLINICAL AND LABORATORY EFFECTS OF METRONIDAZOLE.

Authors:  H L GARDNER; C D DUKES
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1964-08-15       Impact factor: 8.661

4.  DIAGNOSIS OF HEMOPHILUS VAGINALIS VAGINITIS BY GRAM-STAINED SMEARS.

Authors:  W E DUNKELBERG
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1965-04-01       Impact factor: 8.661

5.  Value of Papanicolaou-stained smears in the diagnosis of trichomoniasis, candidiasis, and cervical herpes simplex virus infection in women.

Authors:  R N Thin; W Atia; J D Parker; C S Nicol; G Canti
Journal:  Br J Vener Dis       Date:  1975-04

6.  Vaginitis.

Authors:  E A Banner
Journal:  Med Clin North Am       Date:  1974-07       Impact factor: 5.456

7.  Method for isolation and identification of Corynebacterium vaginale (Haemophilus vaginalis).

Authors:  W E Dunkelberg; R Skaggs; D S Kellogg
Journal:  Appl Microbiol       Date:  1970-01

8.  Isolation and identification of Corynebacterium vaginale (Haemophilus vaginalis) in women with infections of the lower genital tract.

Authors:  M Akerlund; P A Mårdh
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  1974       Impact factor: 3.636

9.  Relative incidence of Corynebacterium vaginale (Haemophilus vaginalis), Neisseria gonorrhoeae, and Trichomonas spp. among women attending a venereal disease clinic.

Authors:  W E Dunkelberg; R Skaggs; D S Kellogg; G K Domescik
Journal:  Br J Vener Dis       Date:  1970-06

10.  New medium for isolation of Corynebacterium vaginale from genital specimens.

Authors:  R F Smith
Journal:  Health Lab Sci       Date:  1975-07
View more
  10 in total

Review 1.  Bacterial vaginosis.

Authors:  C A Spiegel
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 26.132

Review 2.  An overview of the diagnosis and treatment of Gardnerella vaginalis and Bacteroides associated vaginitis.

Authors:  B M Jones; G R Kinghorn; B I Duerden
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1982-10       Impact factor: 3.267

3.  Comparison of microscopic and cultural findings in the diagnosis of Gardnerella vaginalis infection.

Authors:  D Milatovic; K Machka; R V Brosch; H J Wallner; I Braveny
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1982-10       Impact factor: 3.267

4.  Detection of Gardnerella vaginalis in vaginal specimens by direct immunofluorescence.

Authors:  W Hansen; B Vray; K Miller; F Crokaert; E Yourassowsky
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Detection of Trichomonas vaginalis in vaginal specimens by direct immunofluorescence assay.

Authors:  R F Smith
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1986-12       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Comparison of culture and microscopy in the diagnosis of Gardnerella vaginalis infection.

Authors:  C A Ison; S G Dawson; J Hilton; G W Csonka; C S Easmon
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1982-05       Impact factor: 3.411

7.  Diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis by direct gram stain of vaginal fluid.

Authors:  C A Spiegel; R Amsel; K K Holmes
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1983-07       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Predictive value of the "clue cells" investigation and the amine volatilization test in vaginal infections caused by Gardnerella vaginalis.

Authors:  G Marquez-Davila; C E Martinez-Barreda
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1985-10       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Incubation time, second blind passage, and cost considerations in the isolation of Trichomonas vaginalis.

Authors:  R F Smith
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1986-07       Impact factor: 5.948

10.  Direct microscopical versus cultural method in screening for candidiasis among non gravid nigerian women.

Authors:  I A Elegbe; M Botu
Journal:  Mycopathologia       Date:  1982-09-17       Impact factor: 2.574

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.