Literature DB >> 6972437

Selective enhancement and suppression of frog gustatory responses to amino acids.

K Yoshii, Y Kobatake, K Kurihara.   

Abstract

Properties of the receptor sites for L-amino acids in taste cells of the bullfrog (Rana catesbeiana) were examined by measuring the neural activities of the glossopharyngeal nerve under various conditions. (a) The frogs responded to 12 amino acids, but the responses to the amino acids varied with individual frogs under natural conditions. The frog tongues, however, exhibited similar responses after an alkaline treatment that removes Ca2+ from the tissue. The variation in the responses under natural conditions was apparently due to the variation in the amount of Ca2+ bound to the receptor membrane. (b) The responses to hydrophilic L-amino acids (glycine, L-alanine, L-serine, L-threonine, L-cysteine, and L-proline) were of a tonic type, but those to hydrophobic L-amino acids (L-valine, L-leucine, L-isoleucine, L-methionine, L-phenylalanine, and L-tyrptophan) were usually composed of both phasic and tonic components. (c) The properties of the tonic component were quite different from those of the phasic component: the tonic component was largely enhanced by the alkaline treatment and suppressed by the acidic treatment that increases binding of Ca2+ to the tissue. Also, the tonic component was suppressed by the presence of low concentrations of salts, or the action of pronase E, whereas the phasic component was unchanged under these conditions. These properties of the phasic component were quite similar to those of the response to hydrophobic substances such as quinine. These results suggest that the hydrophilic L-amino acids stimulate receptor protein(s) and that the hydrophobic L-amino acids stimulate both the receptor protein and a receptor site similar to that for quinine. (d) On the basis of the suppression of the responses to amino acids by salts, the mechanism of generation of the receptor potential is discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1981        PMID: 6972437      PMCID: PMC2215422          DOI: 10.1085/jgp.77.4.373

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gen Physiol        ISSN: 0022-1295            Impact factor:   4.086


  10 in total

1.  Change in zeta potential and membrane potential of slime mold Physarum polycephalum in response to chemical stimuli.

Authors:  M Hato; T Ueda; K Kurihara; Y Kobatake
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  1976-02-19

Review 2.  Transduction mechanism in chemoreception.

Authors:  K Kurihara; N Kamo; Y Kobatake
Journal:  Adv Biophys       Date:  1978

3.  Responses of gustatory cells in the tongue of rat to stimuli representing four taste qualities.

Authors:  M Ozeki; M Sato
Journal:  Comp Biochem Physiol A Comp Physiol       Date:  1972-02-01

4.  Physicochemical studies of taste reception. II. Possible mechanism of generation of taste receptor potential induced by salt stimuli.

Authors:  N Kamo; M Miyake; K Kurihara; Y Kobatake
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  1974-10-10

5.  Interpretation by theoretical model of dynamic and steady components in frog gustatory response.

Authors:  T Kashiwagura; N Kamo; K Kurihara; Y Kobatake
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1980-05

6.  Electrical responses to frog taste cells to chemical stimuli.

Authors:  N Akaike; A Noma; M Sato
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1976-01       Impact factor: 5.182

7.  Role of membrane-bound calcium in taste reception of the frog.

Authors:  N Kamo; T Kashiwagura; Y Kobatake; K Kurihara
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1978-09       Impact factor: 5.182

8.  Pysicochemical studies of taste reception. V. Suppressive effect of salts on sugar response of the frog.

Authors:  M Miyake; N Kamo; K Kurihara; Y Kobatake
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  1976-07-15

9.  The effect of changing the internal solution on sodium inactivation and related phenomena in giant axons.

Authors:  W K Chandler; A L Hodgkin; H Meves
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1965-10       Impact factor: 5.182

10.  Amino acids as gustatory stimuli in the rat.

Authors:  B P HALPERN; R A BERNARD; M R KARE
Journal:  J Gen Physiol       Date:  1962-03       Impact factor: 4.086

  10 in total
  2 in total

1.  Hypertonicity augments bullfrog taste nerve responses to inorganic salts.

Authors:  Namie Beppu; Yoko Higure; Kazunori Mashiyama; Yoshitaka Ohtubo; Takashi Kumazawa; Kiyonori Yoshii
Journal:  Pflugers Arch       Date:  2012-03-16       Impact factor: 3.657

2.  Patch-clamp study of isolated taste receptor cells of the frog.

Authors:  P Avenet; B Lindemann
Journal:  J Membr Biol       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 1.843

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.