Literature DB >> 6957880

Metastatic variants are generated spontaneously at a high rate in mouse KHT tumor.

J F Harris, A F Chambers, R P Hill, V Ling.   

Abstract

Using the Luria-Delbrück fluctuation analysis, we have examined the lung tumor-forming ability of a series of parallel clones derived from the KHT tumor, grown to small defined sizes. From these studies, we conclude that metastatic variants arise spontaneously in the clonal lines during their growth, at an apparent rate of approximately 10(-5) per cell per generation. This rapid rate has implications for our understanding of tumor heterogeneity and the process of tumor progression. Previous results have suggested that heterogeneity observed in cloning experiments reflects stable subpopulations of cells in the original tumor. We propose here an alternative "dynamic heterogeneity" model, in which metastatic variants arise at a high rate (as detected in the cloning experiments) but need not be stable mutations in order to effectively produce metastases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1982        PMID: 6957880      PMCID: PMC346941          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.79.18.5547

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  24 in total

1.  A theoretical study on spontaneous mutation rate.

Authors:  S Kondo
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  1972-04       Impact factor: 2.433

2.  Two types of ribosome in mouse-hamster hybrid cells.

Authors:  C P Stanners; G L Eliceiri; H Green
Journal:  Nat New Biol       Date:  1971-03-10

3.  Growth rate and chromosome number of tumor cell lines with different metastatic potential.

Authors:  M A Cifone; M L Kripke; I J Fidler
Journal:  J Supramol Struct       Date:  1979

4.  Heterogeneity and variability of artificial lung colony-forming ability among clones from mouse fibrosarcoma.

Authors:  N Suzuki; H R Withers; M W Koehler
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1978-10       Impact factor: 12.701

5.  Factors influencing the quantitative estimation of the in vivo survival of cells from solid tumors.

Authors:  R F Kallman; G Silini; L M Van Putten
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1967-09       Impact factor: 13.506

6.  Metastasis: differences between cancer cells in primary and secondary tumors.

Authors:  L Weiss
Journal:  Pathobiol Annu       Date:  1980

Review 7.  The pathogenesis of cancer metastasis.

Authors:  G Poste; I J Fidler
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1980-01-10       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Malignancies of metastatic murine lymphosarcoma cell lines and clones correlate with decreased cell surface display of RNA tumor virus envelope glycoprotein gp70.

Authors:  C L Reading; K W Brunson; M Torrianni; G L Nicolson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1980-10       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Properties of metastatic and nonmetastatic cloned subpopulations of an ultraviolet-light-induced murine fibrosarcoma of recent origin.

Authors:  I J Fidler; M A Cifone
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  1979-12       Impact factor: 4.307

10.  Phenotypic drift of metastatic and cell-surface properties of mammary adenocarcinoma cell clones during growth in vitro.

Authors:  A Neri; G L Nicolson
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  1981-12       Impact factor: 7.396

View more
  41 in total

1.  Origin of multidrug resistance in cells with and without multidrug resistance genes: chromosome reassortments catalyzed by aneuploidy.

Authors:  P Duesberg; R Stindl; R Hehlmann
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-09-11       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  The significance of biological heterogeneity.

Authors:  H Rubin
Journal:  Cancer Metastasis Rev       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 9.264

3.  Modulation of clonal progression in B16F1 melanoma cells.

Authors:  J F Harris; A F Chambers; A S Tam
Journal:  Clin Exp Metastasis       Date:  1991 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.150

4.  Dynamic heterogeneity: metastatic variants to liver are generated spontaneously in mouse embryonal carcinoma cells.

Authors:  J F Harris; M W Best
Journal:  Clin Exp Metastasis       Date:  1988 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.150

Review 5.  Quantitative genetic analysis of tumor progression.

Authors:  V Ling; A F Chambers; J F Harris; R P Hill
Journal:  Cancer Metastasis Rev       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 9.264

Review 6.  Somatic cell fusion as a source of genetic rearrangement leading to metastatic variants.

Authors:  L Larizza; V Schirrmacher
Journal:  Cancer Metastasis Rev       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 9.264

Review 7.  Generation of phenotypic diversity and progression in metastatic tumor cells.

Authors:  G L Nicolson
Journal:  Cancer Metastasis Rev       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 9.264

8.  Preventing diversification of malignant tumor cells during therapy.

Authors:  G L Nicolson; R Lotan
Journal:  Clin Exp Metastasis       Date:  1986 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 5.150

9.  Dynamic heterogeneity: isolation of murine tumor cell populations enriched for metastatic variants and quantification of the unstable expression of the phenotype.

Authors:  S D Young; R P Hill
Journal:  Clin Exp Metastasis       Date:  1986 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 5.150

Review 10.  Mechanisms of metastasis.

Authors:  Kent W Hunter; Nigel P S Crawford; Jude Alsarraj
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 6.466

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.