Literature DB >> 6388823

Somatic cell fusion as a source of genetic rearrangement leading to metastatic variants.

L Larizza, V Schirrmacher.   

Abstract

Tumor cell populations displaying metastatic properties often have higher gene dosage than their less malignant progenitor tumors, as shown by increased ploidy levels, chromosome duplication and gene amplification. The acquisition by tumor cells of high chromosome numbers may be due to endoreduplication or somatic hybridization either between tumor cells or between tumor and host cells. All such mechanisms increase genetic variability and instability in tumor cells since they trigger a polyploidization-segregation cycle. Among the wide variety of segregants which may emerge from high-ploidy cells, variants with increased malignancy can be positively selected in vivo. Evidence for in vivo fusion of tumor and normal host cells has been reported in different tumor systems. However the attainment by tumor-host hybrids of a higher degree of malignancy has only been observed following substantial chromosome segregation. The involvement of a cell of bone marrow origin as preferential host partner in the fusion process has been proved both by studies on tumor-host hybrids in bone marrow radiation chimeras and in vitro hybridization experiments between non-metastatic tumors and normal lymphoreticular cells which have led to the establishment of metastatic variants. Several different segregational mechanisms may bring about homozygosity or hemizygosity of recessive alleles in tumor-host hybrids, leading to their expression. The marked chromosome dynamics of tumor-host hybrids are also responsible for extensive chromosome rearrangements. At the molecular level these may represent mechanisms causing altered oncogene activity. The activation of new oncogenes by transposition or amplification as well as the amplification of previously activated oncogenes are the mechanisms most likely to be responsible for transition from low to high malignancy, occurring through ploidy changes, such as those produced by somatic mating.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6388823     DOI: 10.1007/bf00048385

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Metastasis Rev        ISSN: 0167-7659            Impact factor:   9.264


  189 in total

1.  Some thoughts about genetics, differentiation, and malignancy.

Authors:  H Harris
Journal:  Somatic Cell Genet       Date:  1979-11

2.  Induction of tumor cell rejection in the low responsive YAC-lymphoma strain A host combination by immunization with somatic cell hybrids.

Authors:  G Klein; E Klein
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  1979-04       Impact factor: 9.162

3.  Transforming genes of human bladder and lung carcinoma cell lines are homologous to the ras genes of Harvey and Kirsten sarcoma viruses.

Authors:  C J Der; T G Krontiris; G M Cooper
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1982-06       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Antigenic variation in cancer metastasis: immune escape versus immune control.

Authors:  V Schirrmacher; M Fogel; E Russmann; K Bosslet; P Altevogt; L Beck
Journal:  Cancer Metastasis Rev       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 9.264

Review 5.  Generation of phenotypic diversity and progression in metastatic tumor cells.

Authors:  G L Nicolson
Journal:  Cancer Metastasis Rev       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 9.264

6.  Genotypic and phenotypic evolution of a murine tumor during its progression in vivo toward metastasis.

Authors:  A E Lagarde; T P Donaghue; J W Dennis; R S Kerbel
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1983-07       Impact factor: 13.506

7.  Arrest and metastasis of blood-borne tumor cells are modified by fusion of plasma membrane vesicles from highly metastatic cells.

Authors:  G Poste; G L Nicolson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1980-01       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Mouse c-myc oncogene is located on chromosome 15 and translocated to chromosome 12 in plasmacytomas.

Authors:  S Crews; R Barth; L Hood; J Prehn; K Calame
Journal:  Science       Date:  1982-12-24       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 9.  Translocations among antibody genes in human cancer.

Authors:  P Leder; J Battey; G Lenoir; C Moulding; W Murphy; H Potter; T Stewart; R Taub
Journal:  Science       Date:  1983-11-18       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Microcell-mediated transfer of murine chromosomes into mouse, Chinese hamster, and human somatic cells.

Authors:  R E Fournier; F H Ruddle
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1977-01       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  21 in total

1.  Contradictory Concepts in the Etiology and Regression of Kaposi's Sarcoma. The Ferenc Györkey Memorial Lecture.

Authors:  Joseph G Sinkovics
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 3.201

2.  Dynamic heterogeneity: metastatic variants to liver are generated spontaneously in mouse embryonal carcinoma cells.

Authors:  J F Harris; M W Best
Journal:  Clin Exp Metastasis       Date:  1988 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.150

Review 3.  Implications of tumor progression on clinical oncology.

Authors:  D R Welch; S P Tomasovic
Journal:  Clin Exp Metastasis       Date:  1985 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 5.150

4.  Detection of chromosome aberrations in metaphase and interphase tumor cells by in situ hybridization using chromosome-specific library probes.

Authors:  T Cremer; P Lichter; J Borden; D C Ward; L Manuelidis
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 4.132

5.  Generation of adhesive tumor variants: chromosomal changes, reduction in malignancy and increased expression of a distinct membrane glycoprotein.

Authors:  E Pflüger; E Lang; R Benke; B Heckl-Ostreicher; P Altevogt; V Schirrmacher
Journal:  Clin Exp Metastasis       Date:  1988 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.150

6.  Horizontal transmission and retention of malignancy, as well as functional human genes, after spontaneous fusion of human glioblastoma and hamster host cells in vivo.

Authors:  David M Goldenberg; David Zagzag; Kerstin M Heselmeyer-Haddad; Lissa Y Berroa Garcia; Thomas Ried; Meiyu Loo; Chien-Hsing Chang; David V Gold
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2011-08-30       Impact factor: 7.396

Review 7.  Quantitative genetic analysis of tumor progression.

Authors:  V Ling; A F Chambers; J F Harris; R P Hill
Journal:  Cancer Metastasis Rev       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 9.264

8.  Melanoma x macrophage hybrids with enhanced metastatic potential.

Authors:  M Rachkovsky; S Sodi; A Chakraborty; Y Avissar; J Bolognia; J M McNiff; J Platt; D Bermudes; J Pawelek
Journal:  Clin Exp Metastasis       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 5.150

9.  The benzene metabolite, hydroquinone and etoposide both induce endoreduplication in human lymphoblastoid TK6 cells.

Authors:  Zhiying Ji; Luoping Zhang; Weihong Guo; Cliona M McHale; Martyn T Smith
Journal:  Mutagenesis       Date:  2009-06-02       Impact factor: 3.000

10.  Efficient acquisition of dual metastasis organotropism to bone and lung through stable spontaneous fusion between MDA-MB-231 variants.

Authors:  Xin Lu; Yibin Kang
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-05-20       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.