Literature DB >> 2208565

The significance of biological heterogeneity.

H Rubin1.   

Abstract

Heterogeneity of expression for a variety of characteristics is found among malignant cells in the organism and in culture. Normal cells are relatively uniform when organized in a tissue, but become heterogeneous for many characteristics when they are dispersed and grown in monolayer culture. The heterogenizing effect of growth in culture indicates that the morphology and behavior of normal cells is ordered by their topological relations in tissues and other homeostatic influences of the organism. Weakening of these ordering relations may contribute to malignant transformation, as it usually does in rodent cell culture. Although phenotypic differences among cells of a given type may be transient, they can be perpetuated by protracted exposure to selective conditions. Examples are cited of selection which leads to an adapted state that is heritable for many cell generations after removal of the selective conditions. Such heritable adaptations are analogous to the Dauermodifikationen, or lingering changes, first described in ciliated protozoa and shown there to be under cytoplasmic control. The concept of progressive state selection is introduced to account for heritable adaptation at the cellular level. It depends on the spontaneous occurrence of transient, variant states and their successive selection to progressively higher levels of adaptation to an altered microenvironment. Although the process is basically epigenetic, it may be stabilized by genetic change. The concept is consistent with our present knowledge of tumor development, including progression to metastasis, and with epigenetic aspects of normal development.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2208565     DOI: 10.1007/bf00047585

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Metastasis Rev        ISSN: 0167-7659            Impact factor:   9.264


  81 in total

1.  The origin of mutants.

Authors:  J Cairns; J Overbaugh; S Miller
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1988-09-08       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Clones of Chinese hamster cells cultivated in vitro not permanently resistant to azaguanine.

Authors:  M P Carson; D Vernick; J Morrow
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  1974-07       Impact factor: 2.433

Review 3.  Multidrug resistance.

Authors:  J A Moscow; K H Cowan
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1988-03-02       Impact factor: 13.506

4.  Shifts in tumor cell phenotypes induced by signals from the microenvironment. Relevance for the immunobiology of cancer metastasis.

Authors:  V Schirrmacher
Journal:  Immunobiology       Date:  1980-07       Impact factor: 3.144

5.  Analysis of variability in albumin content of sister hepatoma cells and a model for geometric phenotypic variability (quantitative shift model).

Authors:  J A Peterson
Journal:  Somat Cell Mol Genet       Date:  1984-07

6.  Quantitative phenotypic variation in single normal and malignant cells from liver and breast occurs along a geometric series.

Authors:  J A Peterson; W L Chaovapong; A A Dehgnan
Journal:  Somat Cell Mol Genet       Date:  1984-07

7.  Selection and adaptation for rapid growth in culture of cells from delayed sarcomas in nude mice.

Authors:  H Rubin; B M Chu; P Arnstein
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1987-01-15       Impact factor: 12.701

8.  Cancer metastasis is selective or random depending on the parent tumour population.

Authors:  J E Talmadge; I J Fidler
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1982-06-17       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Evidence for the progressive and adaptive nature of spontaneous transformation in the NIH 3T3 cell line.

Authors:  H Rubin; K Xu
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Maintenance of multiplication rate stability by cell populations in the face of heterogeneity among individual cells.

Authors:  R Grundel; H Rubin
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 5.285

View more
  20 in total

1.  Cellular heterogeneity: do differences make a difference?

Authors:  Steven J Altschuler; Lani F Wu
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2010-05-14       Impact factor: 41.582

2.  Role of transfection and clonal selection in mediating radioresistance.

Authors:  F S Pardo; R G Bristow; A Taghian; A Ong; C Borek
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1991-12-01       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Is there conscious choice in directed mutation, phenocopies, and related phenomena? An answer based on quantum measurement theory.

Authors:  A Goswami; D Todd
Journal:  Integr Physiol Behav Sci       Date:  1997 Apr-Jun

Review 4.  Stochastic developmental variation, an epigenetic source of phenotypic diversity with far-reaching biological consequences.

Authors:  Günter Vogt
Journal:  J Biosci       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 1.826

5.  On-chip immunofluorescence analysis of single cervical cells using an electroactive microwell array with barrier for cervical screening.

Authors:  Makoto Takeuchi; Kazunori Nagasaka; Mina Yoshida; Yoshiko Kawata; Yuko Miyagawa; Saori Tago; Haruko Hiraike; Osamu Wada-Hiraike; Katsutoshi Oda; Yutaka Osuga; Tomoyuki Fujii; Takuya Ayabe; Soo Hyeon Kim; Teruo Fujii
Journal:  Biomicrofluidics       Date:  2019-07-30       Impact factor: 2.800

Review 6.  Metastasis suppressor genes at the interface between the environment and tumor cell growth.

Authors:  Douglas R Hurst; Danny R Welch
Journal:  Int Rev Cell Mol Biol       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 6.813

7.  Patterns of basal signaling heterogeneity can distinguish cellular populations with different drug sensitivities.

Authors:  Dinesh Kumar Singh; Chin-Jen Ku; Chonlarat Wichaidit; Robert J Steininger; Lani F Wu; Steven J Altschuler
Journal:  Mol Syst Biol       Date:  2010-05-11       Impact factor: 11.429

8.  An approach for extensibly profiling the molecular states of cellular subpopulations.

Authors:  Lit-Hsin Loo; Hai-Jui Lin; Robert J Steininger; Yanqin Wang; Lani F Wu; Steven J Altschuler
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2009-09-20       Impact factor: 28.547

9.  Morphological heterogeneity and phenotypical instability versus metastatic stability in the murine tumor model ER 15-P.

Authors:  G Edel; A Roessner; B Deneke; B Wörmann
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 4.553

10.  Intraclonal protein expression heterogeneity in recombinant CHO cells.

Authors:  Warren Pilbrough; Trent P Munro; Peter Gray
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-12-23       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.