Literature DB >> 3354366

Assessment of responsiveness in acute cerebral disorders. A multicentre study on the reaction level scale (RLS 85).

D Stålhammar1, J E Starmark, E Holmgren, N Eriksson, C H Nordström, O Fedders, B Rosander.   

Abstract

A new scale for assessment of overall responsiveness, the Reaction Level Scale (RLS 85), which has been shown to have better reliability than the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), has been tested in four neurosurgical departments regarding inter-observer agreement and coverage i.e. the proportion of patients that could be assessed by the scale. In a carefully designed study 51 observers pairwise performed 164 tests on 88 patients. Reliability was studied by the Kappa method, which is defined as inter-observer agreement corrected for agreement by chance. The inter-observer agreement measured as overall Kappa was good (K = 0.69 +/- 0.05) and there were no significant differences between the departments, professional categories or aetiologies. Regarding the separate RLS 85 levels the Kappa values were above 0.65, except for withdrawing (K = 0.51) and flexor responses (K = 0.55). There was good inter-observer agreement on coma (K = 0.71). In conclusion, the RLS 85 proved to be easily learnt, it showed full coverage without pseudoscoring, and it was used in a consistent way by doctors, nurses and assistant nurses of four different neurosurgical departments in two Scandinavian countries.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3354366     DOI: 10.1007/bf01560558

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)        ISSN: 0001-6268            Impact factor:   2.216


  23 in total

1.  Agreement between physicians on assessment of outcome following severe head injury.

Authors:  A I Maas; R Braakman; H J Schouten; J M Minderhoud; A H van Zomeren
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1983-03       Impact factor: 5.115

2.  Influence of the type of intracranial lesion on outcome from severe head injury.

Authors:  T A Gennarelli; G M Spielman; T W Langfitt; P L Gildenberg; T Harrington; J A Jane; L F Marshall; J D Miller; L H Pitts
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1982-01       Impact factor: 5.115

3.  Prognosis of patients with severe head injury.

Authors:  B Jennett; G Teasdale; R Braakman; J Minderhoud; J Heiden; T Kurze
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  1979-04       Impact factor: 4.654

4.  Assessment and prognosis of coma after head injury.

Authors:  G Teasdale; B Jennett
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  1976       Impact factor: 2.216

5.  Observer variability in grading patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage.

Authors:  K W Lindsay; G Teasdale; R P Knill-Jones; L Murray
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1982-05       Impact factor: 5.115

6.  Observer variability in assessing impaired consciousness and coma.

Authors:  G Teasdale; R Knill-Jones; J van der Sande
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1978-07       Impact factor: 10.154

7.  Relative prognostic value of best motor response and brain stem reflexes in patients with severe head injury.

Authors:  J D Born; A Albert; P Hans; J Bonnal
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  1985-05       Impact factor: 4.654

8.  Observer variability in assessing the clinical features of subarachnoid hemorrhage.

Authors:  K W Lindsay; G M Teasdale; R P Knill-Jones
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1983-01       Impact factor: 5.115

9.  Factors restricting the use of coma scales.

Authors:  D J Price
Journal:  Acta Neurochir Suppl (Wien)       Date:  1986

10.  Prognosis in nontraumatic coma.

Authors:  D E Levy; D Bates; J J Caronna; N E Cartlidge; R P Knill-Jones; R H Lapinski; B H Singer; D A Shaw; F Plum
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1981-03       Impact factor: 25.391

View more
  10 in total

Review 1.  Evaluation of coma: a critical appraisal of popular scoring systems.

Authors:  Joshua Kornbluth; Anish Bhardwaj
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 3.210

Review 2.  Methodological considerations in the neuropsychological study of central nervous system underarousal with a specific emphasis on coma.

Authors:  D E Stanczak
Journal:  Neuropsychol Rev       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 7.444

Review 3.  From unresponsive wakefulness to minimally conscious PLUS and functional locked-in syndromes: recent advances in our understanding of disorders of consciousness.

Authors:  Marie-Aurélie Bruno; Audrey Vanhaudenhuyse; Aurore Thibaut; Gustave Moonen; Steven Laureys
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2011-06-16       Impact factor: 4.849

4.  The Reaction Level Scale (RLS85). Manual and guidelines.

Authors:  J E Starmark; D Stålhammar; E Holmgren
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 2.216

5.  Endovascular treatment of acute ischemic stroke in the posterior circulation.

Authors:  Alexandros Rentzos; Jan-Erik Karlsson; Christer Lundqvist; Lars Rosengren; Mikael Hellström; Gunnar Wikholm
Journal:  Interv Neuroradiol       Date:  2018-03-21       Impact factor: 1.610

6.  Comparison of the Glasgow Coma Scale and the Reaction Level Scale for assessment of cerebral responsiveness in the critically ill.

Authors:  Sten M Walther; Ulla Jonasson; Hans Gill
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2003-05-07       Impact factor: 17.440

7.  Identification of tissue-specific cell death using methylation patterns of circulating DNA.

Authors:  Roni Lehmann-Werman; Daniel Neiman; Hai Zemmour; Joshua Moss; Judith Magenheim; Adi Vaknin-Dembinsky; Sten Rubertsson; Bengt Nellgård; Kaj Blennow; Henrik Zetterberg; Kirsty Spalding; Michael J Haller; Clive H Wasserfall; Desmond A Schatz; Carla J Greenbaum; Craig Dorrell; Markus Grompe; Aviad Zick; Ayala Hubert; Myriam Maoz; Volker Fendrich; Detlef K Bartsch; Talia Golan; Shmuel A Ben Sasson; Gideon Zamir; Aharon Razin; Howard Cedar; A M James Shapiro; Benjamin Glaser; Ruth Shemer; Yuval Dor
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-03-14       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  A comparative study of the Reaction Level Scale (RLS85) with Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) and Edinburgh-2 Coma Scale (modified) (E2CS(M)).

Authors:  J Tesseris; N Pantazidis; C Routsi; D Fragoulakis
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 2.216

9.  Urokinase infusion for severe intraventricular haemorrhage.

Authors:  N G Rainov; W L Burkert
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 2.216

10.  Safety and efficacy of applying sufficient analgesia combined with a minimal sedation program as an early antihypertensive treatment for spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Rui Dong; Fen Li; Ying Xu; Pingyan Chen; Marc Maegele; Hong Yang; Wenjin Chen
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2018-11-06       Impact factor: 2.279

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.