Literature DB >> 6895542

Four years of experience with cochlear prostheses.

I J Hochmair-Desoyer, E S Hochmair, K Burian, R E Fischer.   

Abstract

Within the last four years, clinical as well as engineering experience has been gathered with 12 deaf persons who received several versions of an auditory prosthesis. Two years ago we settled on a system consisting of a versatile, passive 4-channel implant driving a scala tympani electrode, and a small external speech-processor. The main characteristics of the prosthetic hearing which can thus be established are: dynamic ranges vary between 12 and 20 dB, the number of discriminable amplitude steps within the dynamic range is comparable to that of a normal-hearing person; subjective pitch increases with stimulation frequency up to at least 1,000 Hz. Thresholds and dynamic ranges as well as a number of other characteristics remain stable over long periods of time. After an initial big step to good open speech understanding by one of our patients it could now be shown, that this patient is not an exemption. Several deaf patients participating in a series of speech tests have demonstrated that it is possible to reestablish some understanding of open speech through the use of the cochlear prosthesis without additional lipreading. A program has been established which aims at achieving experience with this prosthesis in a larger number of deaf people. The program includes: implant candidate selection, implantation, adjustment of speech-processor, hearing and speech rehabilitation, and the collection of comparative "psychoelectric" characteristics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1981        PMID: 6895542

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Prog Technol        ISSN: 0047-6552


  9 in total

1.  The effect of Gaussian noise on the threshold, dynamic range, and loudness of analogue cochlear implant stimuli.

Authors:  Robert P Morse; Peter F Morse; Terry B Nunn; Karen A M Archer; Patrick Boyle
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2006-12-12

2.  Indication for the need of flexible and frequency specific mapping functions in cochlear implant speech processors.

Authors:  Sebastian Hoth
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2006-09-27       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Hearing restoration: Graeme Clark, Ingeborg Hochmair, and Blake Wilson receive the 2013 Lasker~DeBakey Clinical Medical Research Award.

Authors:  Corinne Williams
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2013-09-09       Impact factor: 14.808

4.  The importance of being flexible.

Authors:  Ingeborg Hochmair
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 53.440

Review 5.  Importance of cochlear health for implant function.

Authors:  Bryan E Pfingst; Ning Zhou; Deborah J Colesa; Melissa M Watts; Stefan B Strahl; Soha N Garadat; Kara C Schvartz-Leyzac; Cameron L Budenz; Yehoash Raphael; Teresa A Zwolan
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2014-09-28       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  The Lombard effect observed in speech produced by cochlear implant users in noisy environments: A naturalistic study.

Authors:  Jaewook Lee; Hussnain Ali; Ali Ziaei; Emily A Tobey; John H L Hansen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 7.  Cochlear implants: system design, integration, and evaluation.

Authors:  Fan-Gang Zeng; Stephen Rebscher; William Harrison; Xiaoan Sun; Haihong Feng
Journal:  IEEE Rev Biomed Eng       Date:  2008-11-05

8.  Qualities of Single Electrode Stimulation as a Function of Rate and Place of Stimulation with a Cochlear Implant.

Authors:  David M Landsberger; Katrien Vermeire; Annes Claes; Vincent Van Rompaey; Paul Van de Heyning
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2016 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  Perceptual Differences Between Low-Frequency Analog and Pulsatile Stimulation as Shown by Single- and Multidimensional Scaling.

Authors:  Natalia Stupak; Monica Padilla; Robert P Morse; David M Landsberger
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2018 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.