Literature DB >> 6462116

Naproxen sodium, diflunisal, and placebo in the treatment of chronic back pain.

H Berry, B Bloom, E B Hamilton, D R Swinson.   

Abstract

Thirty-seven patients with chronic back pain were entered into a randomised, 3-way, double-blind, cross-over comparison of naproxen sodium 550 mg twice daily, diflunisal 500 mg twice daily, and placebo. Each treatment was given for 14 days after a preadmission wash-out week during which only paracetamol was allowed. Patients were assessed on admission and at the end of each treatment with respect to global pain, night pain, pain on movement, and pain on standing. Both visual analogue scales and simple descriptive scales were used to measure pain. Side effects were elicited by a nonleading question. Both methods of pain measurement gave similar results and were highly correlated. Naproxen sodium was superior to placebo in relieving global pain and depending on the method of measurement, in relieving night pain and pain on movement. Diflunisal showed no significant differences from placebo. Side effects were similar on all 3 treatments. The final preference of the patients was significantly in favour of the active treatments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1982        PMID: 6462116      PMCID: PMC1000895          DOI: 10.1136/ard.41.2.129

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis        ISSN: 0003-4967            Impact factor:   19.103


  4 in total

1.  Studies with pain rating scales.

Authors:  W W Downie; P A Leatham; V M Rhind; V Wright; J A Branco; J A Anderson
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1978-08       Impact factor: 19.103

2.  Perforated duodenal ulcer on diflunisal (Dolobid)

Authors:  R Talbot; H Rees
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1978-10-28

3.  Naproxen sodium and indomethacin in acute musculoskeletal disorders.

Authors:  C I Backhouse; C Engler; J R English
Journal:  Rheumatol Rehabil       Date:  1980-05

4.  Bioavailability of naproxen sodium and its relationship to clinical analgesic effects.

Authors:  H Sevelius; R Runkel; E Segre; S S Bloomfield
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1980-09       Impact factor: 4.335

  4 in total
  16 in total

Review 1.  Outcome of non-invasive treatment modalities on back pain: an evidence-based review.

Authors:  Maurits W van Tulder; Bart Koes; Antti Malmivaara
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-12-01       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 2.  Imperfect placebos are common in low back pain trials: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  L A C Machado; S J Kamper; R D Herbert; C G Maher; J H McAuley
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-04-18       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Chronic Disability Syndrome: Failing to diagnose disability can jeoparadize rehabilitation.

Authors:  B L Gamborg; W S Elliott; K W Curtis
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 3.275

Review 4.  An examination of the observed placebo effect associated with the treatment of low back pain - a systematic review.

Authors:  Aaron A Puhl; Christine J Reinhart; Elizabeth R Rok; H Stephen Injeyan
Journal:  Pain Res Manag       Date:  2011 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.037

5.  Management of low-back pain in family practice: a critical review.

Authors:  J R Gilbert
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 3.275

6.  Are non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs effective for the management of neck pain and associated disorders, whiplash-associated disorders, or non-specific low back pain? A systematic review of systematic reviews by the Ontario Protocol for Traffic Injury Management (OPTIMa) Collaboration.

Authors:  Jessica J Wong; Pierre Côté; Arthur Ameis; Sharanya Varatharajan; Thepikaa Varatharajan; Heather M Shearer; Robert J Brison; Deborah Sutton; Kristi Randhawa; Hainan Yu; Danielle Southerst; Rachel Goldgrub; Silvano Mior; Maja Stupar; Linda J Carroll; Anne Taylor-Vaisey
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-04-01       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Clinical trials: proposal for an international coding system (ICS).

Authors:  N Bellamy
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1984-02       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 8.  Efficacy of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for low back pain: a systematic review of randomised clinical trials.

Authors:  B W Koes; R J Scholten; J M Mens; L M Bouter
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 19.103

Review 9.  Alternatives to Opioids in the Pharmacologic Management of Chronic Pain Syndromes: A Narrative Review of Randomized, Controlled, and Blinded Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Andrea L Nicol; Robert W Hurley; Honorio T Benzon
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 5.108

Review 10.  Low back pain.

Authors:  J B Reuler
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1985-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.