Literature DB >> 15118828

[Differences between anteroposterior and posterior spondylodesis in clinical scores].

O Linhardt1, A Krüger, A Krödel.   

Abstract

The present study on spondylitis patients was carried out to compare prospectively results of clinical scores of patients treated with anteroposterior or anterior spondylodesis. A total of 22 patients with spondylitis were enrolled in the randomized trial to undergo an operation with anteroposterior or posterior spondylodesis. For quality of life adjustment, the SF-36 health survey was applied. Pain and disability were measured using the Oswestry low-back pain disability questionnaire and visual analogue scales (VAS). Twelve patients were assigned to undergo anteroposterior spondylodesis and ten patients anterior spondylodesis. Postoperative improvement of spinal function, general health, well being, back pain, and mobility could be observed in both groups of patients. Better results of patients treated with anterior spondylodesis compared with anteroposterior spondylodesis were seen. No statistical difference was found between the two groups at any time. The less invasive nature of anterior spondylodesis could be responsible for that result.Anterior spondylodesis should used if possible and deemed adequate because it causes less discomfort.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15118828     DOI: 10.1007/s00113-004-0775-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Unfallchirurg        ISSN: 0177-5537            Impact factor:   1.000


  6 in total

1.  The short form-36 health survey questionnaire in spine surgery.

Authors:  M Grevitt; R Khazim; J Webb; R Mulholland; J Shepperd
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1997-01

2.  Pyogenic non-tuberculous spinal infection: an analysis of thirty cases.

Authors:  J M Digby; J B Kersley
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1979-02

3.  Studies with pain rating scales.

Authors:  W W Downie; P A Leatham; V M Rhind; V Wright; J A Branco; J A Anderson
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1978-08       Impact factor: 19.103

4.  The Oswestry low back pain disability questionnaire.

Authors:  J C Fairbank; J Couper; J B Davies; J P O'Brien
Journal:  Physiotherapy       Date:  1980-08       Impact factor: 3.358

5.  Anterior debridement, fusion, and extrafocal stabilization in the treatment of osteomyelitis of the spine.

Authors:  A Krödel; A Krüger; K Lohscheidt; M Pfahler; H J Refior
Journal:  J Spinal Disord       Date:  1999-02

6.  Intercorrelation and test-retest reliability of the Pain Disability Index (PDI) and the Oswestry Disability Questionnaire (ODQ) and their correlation with pain intensity in low back pain patients.

Authors:  M Grönblad; M Hupli; P Wennerstrand; E Järvinen; A Lukinmaa; J P Kouri; E O Karaharju
Journal:  Clin J Pain       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 3.442

  6 in total
  1 in total

1.  [Surgical management of spondylodiscitis. An analysis of 78 cases].

Authors:  T M Frangen; T Kälicke; M Gottwald; S Andereya; H-J Andress; O J Russe; E J Müller; G Muhr; C Schinkel
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 1.000

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.