Literature DB >> 6845405

Individualizing theophylline therapy: the impact of clinical pharmacokinetics on patient outcomes.

D Mungall, J Marshall, D Penn, A Robinson, J Scott, R Williams, D Hurst.   

Abstract

We have studied 19 male patients whose theophylline therapy was individualized by a clinical pharmacokinetics service and 34 male patients with empirically derived dosages. All patients were admitted to the medical intensive care unit. Patients in the pharmacokinetics group had fewer adverse reactions (15.7 vs. 50%), shorter intensive care unit stay (6.6 +/- 5.5 vs. 12.4 +/- 16.3 days), shorter hospital stay (15.4 +/- 10 vs. 22.3 +/- 14.1 days), and a shorter period of time to be placed on oral therapy (5.2 +/- 3.1 vs. 8.6 +/- 7.2 days) than the group with empirically derived regimens. The pharmacokinetic method used to individualize theophylline therapy offered an accurate and efficient method of achieving therapeutic concentrations. We conclude that the use of clinical pharmacokinetics to individualize theophylline therapy offers substantial benefits over empirical assessments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6845405

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ther Drug Monit        ISSN: 0163-4356            Impact factor:   3.681


  8 in total

Review 1.  Clinical pharmacy in primary care.

Authors:  G M Hawksworth; H Chrystyn
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 4.335

2.  The value of therapeutic drug monitoring to the practising physician--an hypothesis needing sensible application.

Authors:  I D Watson; A H Thomson
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 3.  The economic potential of dual individualisation methodologies.

Authors:  J A Paladino; G S Zimmer; J J Schentag
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 4.  Clinical pharmacokinetics in the 21st century. Does the evidence support definitive outcomes?

Authors:  M H Ensom; G A Davis; C D Cropp; R J Ensom
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 5.  An updated comparison of drug dosing methods. Part II: Theophylline.

Authors:  S M Erdman; K A Rodvold; R D Pryka
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 6.447

6.  Individualizing theophylline dosage: evaluation of a single-point maintenance dose prediction method.

Authors:  J H Wilkens; H Neuenkirchen; G W Sybrecht; M Oellerich
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 2.953

Review 7.  Comparison of drug dosing methods.

Authors:  M E Burton; M R Vasko; D C Brater
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1985 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 8.  Pharmacogenetics: the therapeutic drug monitoring of the future?

Authors:  M H Ensom; T K Chang; P Patel
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 5.577

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.