Literature DB >> 6841371

In vivo biocompatibility studies. I. The cage implant system and a biodegradable hydrogel.

R Marchant, A Hiltner, C Hamlin, A Rabinovitch, R Slobodkin, J M Anderson.   

Abstract

A cage implant system has been utilized to examine the in vivo biocompatibility of a biodegradable hydrogel, poly(2-hydroxy-ethyl-L-glutamine) (PHEG). This system permits the quantitative determination of the components of the inflammatory exudate which surrounds the implanted polymer within the cage system. This system permits the serial examination of exudate components without sacrificing the animal. In addition, this system allows the subsequent removal of the polymer for surface and mechanical studies. Following implantation of the biodegradable hydrogel, quantitative and differential white cell counts of the exudates were determined over a 21-day period. In addition, concomitant extracellular enzyme analyses for alkaline phosphatase, acid phosphatase, prostatic acid phosphatase, leucine amino-peptidase, and Cathepsin B1 were determined. Corresponding control samples from exudates of the cage implant without the polymer were also determined. The two-tailed Student's t-test for unpaired samples was used to statistically compare the control and implanted polymer values for these respective analyses at the various time periods. A comparison of the cellular response for the control system and the PHEG system did not show statistically significant differences during the first 7 days following implantation. The acute inflammatory response, polymorphonuclear leukocyte predominant, was followed by a mild chronic inflammatory response, macrophage and lymphocyte predominant, and during this time period, 8-14 days, macrophages were present in significantly larger numbers for the PHEG system when compared to the control values. Enzymic analysis of the exudates revealed statistically significant differences between control and PHEG values at time intervals where no differences were noted in cell density or population. These results are discussed in terms of cell-polymer interactions leading to cellular activation and enhanced enzyme exocytosis by the inflammatory cells. Stress-strain measurements on implanted PHEG samples showed that significant in vivo degradation had occurred during the acute inflammatory phase of the response, i.e., the first 7 days.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6841371     DOI: 10.1002/jbm.820170209

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res        ISSN: 0021-9304


  18 in total

1.  Defensins impair phagocytic killing by neutrophils in biomaterial-related infection.

Authors:  S S Kaplan; R P Heine; R L Simmons
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 3.441

2.  Biomaterial adherent macrophage apoptosis is increased by hydrophilic and anionic substrates in vivo.

Authors:  William G Brodbeck; Jasmine Patel; Gabriela Voskerician; Elizabeth Christenson; Matthew S Shive; Yasuhide Nakayama; Takehisa Matsuda; Nicholas P Ziats; James M Anderson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-07-16       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  In vitro, in vivo and post explantation testing of glucose-detecting biosensors: current methods and recommendations.

Authors:  Heidi E Koschwanez; William M Reichert
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2007-04-19       Impact factor: 12.479

4.  Biocompatibility of polyhydroxybutyrate microspheres: in vitro and in vivo evaluation.

Authors:  Ekaterina Igorevna Shishatskaya; Olga N Voinova; Anastasiya V Goreva; Olga A Mogilnaya; Tatiana G Volova
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2008-02-06       Impact factor: 3.896

5.  A review of the biocompatibility of implantable devices: current challenges to overcome foreign body response.

Authors:  Yoshinori Onuki; Upkar Bhardwaj; Fotios Papadimitrakopoulos; Diane J Burgess
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2008-11

6.  In vivo biodegradation and biocompatibility of PEG/sebacic acid-based hydrogels using a cage implant system.

Authors:  Jinku Kim; Mahrokh Dadsetan; Syed Ameenuddin; Anthony J Windebank; Michael J Yaszemski; Lichun Lu
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 4.396

Review 7.  Extracellular matrix-based biomaterial scaffolds and the host response.

Authors:  Joseph M Aamodt; David W Grainger
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2016-02-03       Impact factor: 12.479

Review 8.  Biocompatible materials for continuous glucose monitoring devices.

Authors:  Scott P Nichols; Ahyeon Koh; Wesley L Storm; Jae Ho Shin; Mark H Schoenfisch
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2013-02-07       Impact factor: 60.622

9.  Determination of the in vivo degradation mechanism of PEGDA hydrogels.

Authors:  M B Browning; S N Cereceres; P T Luong; E M Cosgriff-Hernandez
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A       Date:  2014-02-13       Impact factor: 4.396

10.  Biodegradation and in vivo biocompatibility of rosin: a natural film-forming polymer.

Authors:  Prashant M Satturwar; Suniket V Fulzele; Avinash K Dorle
Journal:  AAPS PharmSciTech       Date:  2003-10-22       Impact factor: 3.246

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.