Literature DB >> 102163

Progress in radiology: colorectal tumors: pathology and detection.

D J Ott, D W Gelfand.   

Abstract

The prognosis in colorectal neoplasia has not improved in the past 20 years despite improved diagnostic techniques. The greatest promise lies in wider screening and earlier radiographic and endoscopic detection. To clarify the radiologist's role in finding large bowel tumors, the clinical, pathologic, and radiologic literature is reviewed. Since individuals over 40 years of age harbor the bulk of colon neoplasms, the most diligent efforts to detect these lesions should be made in this group. Controlled studies comparing single and double contrast barium enema techniques are lacking, but available data suggest that the double contrast examination is more sensitive for detection of the numerous small, but potentially malignant colon tumors. Careful radiographic technique, including a thoroughly clean colon, is critical for accurate detection regardless of which technique is used.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1978        PMID: 102163     DOI: 10.2214/ajr.131.4.691

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  7 in total

1.  Diagnostic accuracy of the double-contrast enema for colonic polyps in patients with or without diverticular disease.

Authors:  C Morosi; G Ballardini; P Pisani; M Bellomi; G Cozzi; M Vidale; P Spinelli; A Severini
Journal:  Gastrointest Radiol       Date:  1991

Review 2.  Reliability of routine double-contrast examination (DCE) of the large bowel in polyp detection: a prospective clinical study.

Authors:  F T Fork; C Lindström; G R Ekelund
Journal:  Gastrointest Radiol       Date:  1983

3.  Predictive value of a diagnosis of colonic polyp on the double-contrast barium enema.

Authors:  D J Ott; D S Ablin; D W Gelfand; I Meschan
Journal:  Gastrointest Radiol       Date:  1983

4.  Role of CT Colonography in Colonic Lesions and Its Correlation with Conventional Colonoscopic Findings.

Authors:  Kunwarpal Singh; Aparna Kaur Narula; Chuni Lal Thukral; Neeti Rajan Singh; Amandeep Singh; Harmeet Kaur
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2015-04-01

5.  Malignancy risk of small polyps and related factors.

Authors:  Hakan Unal; Haldun Selcuk; Hale Gokcan; Emin Tore; Aylin Sar; Murat Korkmaz; Banu Bilezikci; Beyhan Demirhan; Gurden Gur; Ugur Yilmaz
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2007-03-30       Impact factor: 3.199

6.  Causes of error in gastrointestinal radiology. II. Barium enema examination.

Authors:  D J Ott; D W Gelfand; N A Ramquist
Journal:  Gastrointest Radiol       Date:  1980-04-30

7.  Double contrast enema and colonoscopy in polyp detection.

Authors:  F T Fork
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1981-11       Impact factor: 23.059

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.