Literature DB >> 6832261

Tactile discrimination of gratings.

J W Morley, A W Goodwin, I Darian-Smith.   

Abstract

Human subjects were required to differentiate grating surfaces of alternating grooves and ridges by moving a finger back and forth across the surface. Their discriminative capacities were measured, as well as the movement and force profiles that they selected. To measure discrimination, a forced choice paradigm was used in which three surfaces were presented on each trial. Two surfaces were the same (standards) and the subject was required to indicate which of the three surfaces (the comparison) differed from the other two. Two series of surfaces were used with standards whose spatial periods were 770 and 1002 mu, respectively. Subjects were able to discriminate, at the 75% correct level, two gratings which differed in spatial period by the order of 5%. When tangential movement between the surface and the finger was eliminated, and only radial contact permitted, discrimination was degraded and the 75% correct levels increased to the order of 10%. Subjects were free to choose their own patterns of finger movement and of contact force between finger and surface. Movement was measured cinematographically. For all subjects movement patterns were close to sinusoidal, with frequencies in the range of 4.0 Hz and with mean velocities of the order of 160 mm/s. Patterns of contact force were measured by a force transducer. For all subjects the force varied rhythmically in synchrony with movement, but the patterns and magnitudes varied with the subject. Gratings were scaled for perceived roughness by a magnitude estimation technique: the relationship between perceived roughness and grating period was monotonic.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6832261     DOI: 10.1007/bf00238588

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  14 in total

1.  Coding of incremental changes in skin temperature by a population of warm fibers in the monkey: correlation with intensity discrimination in man.

Authors:  K O Johnson; I Darian-Smith; C LaMotte; B Johnson; S Oldfield
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1979-09       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  ROUGHNESS, SMOOTHNESS, AND PREFERENCE: A STUDY OF QUANTITATIVE RELATIONS IN INDIVIDUAL SUBJECTS.

Authors:  G EKMAN; J HOSMAN; B LINDSTROEM
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1965-07

3.  Tactual discrimination of textures.

Authors:  S S CULBERT; W T STELLWAGEN
Journal:  Percept Mot Skills       Date:  1963-04

4.  Observations on active touch.

Authors:  J J GIBSON
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1962-11       Impact factor: 8.934

5.  The scaling of subjective roughness and smoothness.

Authors:  S S STEVENS; J R HARRIS
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1962-11

6.  A braille-reading machine.

Authors:  A P Grunwald
Journal:  Science       Date:  1966-10-07       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Two-point discrimination distances in the normal hand and forearm: application to various methods of fingertip reconstruction.

Authors:  M Gellis; R Pool
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1977-01       Impact factor: 4.730

8.  "Improving one's touch"...and more.

Authors:  S J Lederman
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1978-08

9.  Spatial frequency analysis in vision.

Authors:  O Braddick
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1981-05-07       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Tactile discrimination of textured surfaces: psychophysical performance measurements in humans.

Authors:  G D Lamb
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1983-05       Impact factor: 5.182

View more
  25 in total

1.  Temporal cues contribute to tactile perception of roughness.

Authors:  C J Cascio; K Sathian
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2001-07-15       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Neural coding mechanisms underlying perceived roughness of finely textured surfaces.

Authors:  T Yoshioka; B Gibb; A K Dorsch; S S Hsiao; K O Johnson
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2001-09-01       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Importance of temporal cues for tactile spatial- frequency discrimination.

Authors:  E Gamzu; E Ahissar
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2001-09-15       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Perceived pitch of vibrotactile stimuli: effects of vibration amplitude, and implications for vibration frequency coding.

Authors:  J W Morley; M J Rowe
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 5.182

5.  Whisker primary afferents encode temporal frequency of moving gratings.

Authors:  Lauren M Jones; Ernest E Kwegyir-Afful; Asaf Keller
Journal:  Somatosens Mot Res       Date:  2006 Mar-Jun       Impact factor: 1.111

6.  A critical speed for gating of tactile detection during voluntary movement.

Authors:  Anita Cybulska-Klosowicz; El-Mehdi Meftah; Mélissa Raby; Marie-Line Lemieux; C Elaine Chapman
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-03-24       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Kinematics of unconstrained tactile texture exploration.

Authors:  Thierri Callier; Hannes P Saal; Elizabeth C Davis-Berg; Sliman J Bensmaia
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-03-04       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Haptic processing of spatially distributed information.

Authors:  S J Lederman; R A Browse; R L Klatzky
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1988-09

9.  Emergence of an Invariant Representation of Texture in Primate Somatosensory Cortex.

Authors:  Justin D Lieber; Sliman J Bensmaia
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2020-05-14       Impact factor: 5.357

10.  The movement-induced modulation in discriminability between cutaneous nonpainful stimuli depends on test stimulus intensity.

Authors:  A Pertovaara; R R Helminen; H Mansikka
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.