Literature DB >> 6821998

Morphometry of the lumbar vertebrae. An anatomic study in two caucasoid ethnic groups.

F Postacchini, M Ripani, S Carpano.   

Abstract

A morphometric study of the lumbar vertebrae of 121 skeletons, 63 Italian and 58 Indian, revealed that the mean dimensions of the spinal canal, the lateral recesses, and the vertebral body were significantly greater in the Italian than in the Indian skeletons. The lowest normal limits of the midsagittal diameters of the spinal canal were 12.6 mm in the Italian skeletons and 11.5 mm in the Indian series. The midsagittal diameters of the canal measured, at one or more levels, 10.1-10.8 mm in 5% of the Italian skeletons and 9.0-10.5 mm in 10% of the Indian skeletons. In most vertebrae with midsagittal dimensions of the canal less than 11.5 mm, the width of the recesses was at or below the lower limits of normal. These observations cast doubt on the current view that a midsagittal diameter of the vertebral canal of less than 12.0 mm is pathologic and suggest that the diagnosis of developmental stenosis can not be based only on the dimensions of the spinal canal. Lateral recess stenosis may occur in a normally sized spinal canal but is more likely to occur in developmentally narrow canals.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6821998

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  14 in total

1.  Clinical perspectives on secular trends of intervertebral foramen diameters in an industrialized European society.

Authors:  Frank J Rühli; Maciej Henneberg
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2004-04-01       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Morphometry of the lower lumbar intervertebral discs and endplates: comparative analyses of new MRI data with previous findings.

Authors:  Ruoliang Tang; Celal Gungor; Richard F Sesek; Kenneth Bo Foreman; Sean Gallagher; Gerard A Davis
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-02-12       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Does the anteroposterior diameter of the bony spinal canal reflect its size? An anatomical study.

Authors:  R Gepstein; Y Folman; P Sagiv; Y Ben David; T Hallel
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 1.246

4.  A novel method for the quantitative evaluation of lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  Fengyu Zheng; James C Farmer; Harvinder S Sandhu; Patrick F O'Leary
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2006-09

5.  Developmental spinal canal stenosis and somatotype.

Authors:  S Nightingale
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 10.154

6.  The level-diagnosis of a lower lumbar disc herniation: the value of sensibility and motor testing.

Authors:  O H Jensen
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 2.980

7.  Anatomy and radiological anatomy of the lumbar radicular canals.

Authors:  B Lassale; G Morvan; M Gottin
Journal:  Anat Clin       Date:  1984

8.  Degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis and lumbar spine configuration.

Authors:  J Abbas; K Hamoud; H May; O Hay; B Medlej; Y Masharawi; N Peled; I Hershkovitz
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-07-21       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Establishment of parameters for congenital thoracic stenosis: a study of 700 postmortem specimens.

Authors:  Navkirat S Bajwa; Jason O Toy; Nicholas U Ahn
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-07-04       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Determination of trunk motion patterns associated with permanent or transient stenosis of the lumbar spine.

Authors:  M Szpalski; F Michel; J P Hayez
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.