Literature DB >> 15057552

Clinical perspectives on secular trends of intervertebral foramen diameters in an industrialized European society.

Frank J Rühli1, Maciej Henneberg.   

Abstract

Low back pain origins have been a matter of great controversy. While spinal stenosis is now radiologically traceable, the alteration of intervertebral foramen is less clear. The aim of this study was to assess "secular trends"-alterations occurring from one generation to the next-in osseous intervertebral foramina of the major vertebral segments in an industrialized society, and to discuss their possible clinical implication. The macerated "maximum intervertebral foramen width" and "intervertebral foramen height" of all major vertebral levels in 71 non-pathologic Swiss adult skeletons from the nineteenth and early twentieth century, with known individual age and sex and similar geographic and socio-economic background, were measured by sliding caliper at validated landmarks. A secular trend of the increase in "maximum intervertebral foramen width" is found for most levels, with females showing a more prominent alteration. Additionally, the non-pathologic "maximum intervertebral foramen width" does not change with respect to individual age, nor is a significant side difference detectable. "Intervertebral foramen height," hereby defined as the difference of the dorsal vertebral body height minus pedicle height, demonstrates for most levels, and either sex, an insignificant negative secular trend. Neither stature nor skeletal robustness vary significantly through time within this particular sample. The results of this study, despite obvious inadequacies of methods used, exclude secular narrowing of the "maximum intervertebral foramen width" as the only cause of radiculopathy or spinal stenosis. Furthermore, we found a mild insignificant decrease of the clinically more relevant "intervertebral foramen height." Nevertheless, the detected short-time variability of the bony intervertebral foramen, independent of individual stature, skeletal robustness or age, argues for an enhanced focus on the understanding of clinically relevant changes of spinal morphology from generation to generation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15057552      PMCID: PMC3454061          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-004-0682-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  49 in total

1.  The economic burden of back pain in the UK.

Authors:  N Maniadakis; A Gray
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 6.961

2.  Craniofacial variation of the Chinese macaques explored with Morphologika.

Authors:  Ruliang Pan; Fuwen Wei; Ming Li
Journal:  J Morphol       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 1.804

3.  Effect of cervical spine motion on the neuroforaminal dimensions of human cervical spine.

Authors:  J U Yoo; D Zou; W T Edwards; J Bayley; H A Yuan
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  An Anatomic Study of the Lumbosacral Region in Relation to Low Back Pain and Sciatica.

Authors:  W A Larmon
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1944-06       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Abnormal magnetic-resonance scans of the lumbar spine in asymptomatic subjects. A prospective investigation.

Authors:  S D Boden; D O Davis; T S Dina; N J Patronas; S W Wiesel
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  Lateral lumbar spinal canal stenosis: classification, pathologic anatomy and surgical decompression.

Authors:  C K Lee; W Rauschning; W Glenn
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1988-03       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Can infant malnutrition cause adult vertebral stenosis?

Authors:  G A Clark; M M Panjabi; F T Wetzel
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1985-03       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Morphometry of the lumbar vertebrae. An anatomic study in two caucasoid ethnic groups.

Authors:  F Postacchini; M Ripani; S Carpano
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1983 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Lumbar disc disease and stenosis.

Authors:  M F Gaskill; R Lukin; J G Wiot
Journal:  Radiol Clin North Am       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 2.303

10.  Subarticular entrapment of the dorsal root ganglion as a cause of sciatic pain.

Authors:  R G Vanderlinden
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1984 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  2 in total

1.  The estrogen hypothesis of obesity.

Authors:  James P Grantham; Maciej Henneberg
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-06-10       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  A case of T2 radiculopathy after anterior C5-6 fusion.

Authors:  Tomofumi Takenaka; Yu-Ichiro Ohnishi; Satoru Oshino
Journal:  J Surg Case Rep       Date:  2016-05-19
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.