Literature DB >> 22760603

Establishment of parameters for congenital thoracic stenosis: a study of 700 postmortem specimens.

Navkirat S Bajwa1, Jason O Toy, Nicholas U Ahn.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Congenital thoracic stenosis (CTS) occurs when the bony anatomy of the canal is smaller than expected in the general population. The diagnosis currently is made based on the clinical impression from subjective radiographic studies, and the normal values for CTS have not been established. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We provided a statistical definition for CTS based on objective measurements of thoracic spine specimens and explored parameters that might predict CTS.
METHODS: We selected 700 adult skeletal specimens from the Hamann-Todd Collection in the Cleveland Museum of Natural History (Cleveland, OH, USA). We used calipers to measure the sagittal canal diameter (SCD), interpedicle distance (IPD), and pedicle length (PL). At each level, canal area was calculated using a geometric formula, a standard distribution was created, and values two SDs below the mean were considered congenitally stenotic. Corresponding values of SCD and IPD of the stenotic specimens were studied. The values of SCD and IPD predicting CTS with highest sensitivity and specificity were tabulated.
RESULTS: At each level, CTS was defined as: T1, 160 mm(2); T2, 135 mm(2); T3, 131 mm(2); T4, 130 mm(2), T5, 129 mm(2), T6, 127 mm(2); T7, 127 mm(2); T8, 129 mm(2); T9, 130 mm(2); T10, 132 mm(2); T11, 140 mm(2); and T12, 173 mm(2). A SCD less than 15 mm and an IPD less than 18.5 mm were predictive of CTS at each level with sensitivities and specificities of 80% to 100%.
CONCLUSIONS: We statistically defined CTS at each level. A SCD less than 15 mm or IPD less than 18.5 mm predicted the presence of CTS at all levels. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: In a symptomatic patient, on routine radiologic examination, a physician should suspect stenosis of the thoracic canal if the SCD and IPD are less than 15 and 18.5 mm respectively. As a spinal deformity surgeon, the canal area is especially relevant when considering a possible canal intrusion by implants.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22760603      PMCID: PMC3462840          DOI: 10.1007/s11999-012-2461-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  34 in total

1.  Determining the sagittal dimensions of the canal of the cervical spine. The reliability of ratios of anatomical measurements.

Authors:  H R Blackley; L D Plank; P A Robertson
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1999-01

2.  The cervical spine; an anatomico-pathological study of 70 specimens (using a special technique) with particular reference to the problem of cervical spondylosis.

Authors:  E E PAYNE; J D SPILLANE
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1957-12       Impact factor: 13.501

3.  Dimensions of the cervical vertebrae.

Authors:  C C FRANCIS
Journal:  Anat Rec       Date:  1955-08

4.  Projection of the thoracic pedicle and its morphometric analysis.

Authors:  N A Ebraheim; R Xu; M Ahmad; R A Yeasting
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1997-02-01       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 5.  Acquired lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  J A Jane; J A Jane; G A Helm; D F Kallmes; C I Shaffrey; J B Chadduck; C G DiPierro
Journal:  Clin Neurosurg       Date:  1996

6.  Vertebral body and posterior element morphology: the normal spine in middle life.

Authors:  P V Scoles; A E Linton; B Latimer; M E Levy; B F Digiovanni
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Anatomy of the thoracic pedicle.

Authors:  B M McCormack; E C Benzel; M S Adams; N G Baldwin; F W Rupp; D J Maher
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 4.654

8.  Morphometry of the lumbar vertebrae. An anatomic study in two caucasoid ethnic groups.

Authors:  F Postacchini; M Ripani; S Carpano
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1983 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Mid-sagittal dimensions of cervical vertebral bodies.

Authors:  P R Katz; H M Reynolds; D R Foust; J K Baum
Journal:  Am J Phys Anthropol       Date:  1975-11       Impact factor: 2.868

10.  The normal interpediculate space in the spines of infants and children.

Authors:  W A SIMRIL; D THURSTON
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1955-03       Impact factor: 11.105

View more
  1 in total

1.  Diffuse Spinal Hyperostosis Causing Severe Spinal Stenosis and Thoracic Myelopathy.

Authors:  Daniel Alsoof; George Anderson; Kevin J DiSilvestro; Christopher L McDonald; Eren O Kuris; Alan H Daniels
Journal:  Orthop Rev (Pavia)       Date:  2022-08-25
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.