Literature DB >> 6816815

Fetal head and abdominal circumferences: I. Evaluation of measurement errors.

R L Deter, R B Harrist, F P Hadlock, R J Carpenter.   

Abstract

Several sources of error associated with the measurement of fetal head and abdominal circumferences (HC, AC) were examined using dynamic image ultrasound. Statistically significant systematic intraobserver errors were not seen unless technical differences in the images were present (HC only) and the range for random errors was 4-5% (2 SD) for both measurements. Although differences in the procedures used to acquire images for measurement had some effect on accuracy (HC only), the primary source of variations in measurements made by different investigators was the measurement methods. Different measuring devices gave different results and different investigators used the same devices differently. Under optimal measuring conditions, the interobserver error for experienced investigators was 1.2 (+/-4.3 SD)% for HC and 2.4 (+/-1.6 SD)% for AC. Comparison of prenatal and postnatal measurements indicated that there were no systematic differences for HC but for AC, the prenatal measurements were 6% greater. Random differences were +/-6% (2 SD) for HC and +/-13% (2 SD) for AC.

Mesh:

Year:  1982        PMID: 6816815     DOI: 10.1002/jcu.1870100803

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Ultrasound        ISSN: 0091-2751            Impact factor:   0.910


  6 in total

1.  Foetal growth parameters--clinical versus ultrasonographic.

Authors:  M Berry; K J Coyaji; M P Gogoi; B S Kodkany; K S Parikh; D Patel; M Y Rawal; P C Sengupta; V Walvekar; B S Dhillon
Journal:  Indian J Pediatr       Date:  1992 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.967

2.  Adaptive region-growing with maximum curvature strategy for tumor segmentation in 18F-FDG PET.

Authors:  Shan Tan; Laquan Li; Wookjin Choi; Min Kyu Kang; Warren D D'Souza; Wei Lu
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2017-06-12       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  Estimating fetal weight for best clinical outcome.

Authors:  Susan Campbell Westerway
Journal:  Australas J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2015-12-31

4.  Scientific basis for standardization of fetal head measurements by ultrasound: a reproducibility study.

Authors:  R Napolitano; V Donadono; E O Ohuma; C L Knight; S Z Wanyonyi; B Kemp; T Norris; A T Papageorghiou
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 7.299

5.  Diagnostic Accuracy of Ultrasound Scanning for Prenatal Microcephaly in the context of Zika Virus Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ezinne C Chibueze; Alex J Q Parsons; Katharina da Silva Lopes; Takemoto Yo; Toshiyuki Swa; Chie Nagata; Nobuyuki Horita; Naho Morisaki; Olukunmi O Balogun; Amarjargal Dagvadorj; Erika Ota; Rintaro Mori; Olufemi T Oladapo
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-05-23       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  WHO multicentre study for the development of growth standards from fetal life to childhood: the fetal component.

Authors:  Mario Merialdi; Mariana Widmer; Ahmet Metin Gülmezoglu; Hany Abdel-Aleem; George Bega; Alexandra Benachi; Guillermo Carroli; Jose Guilherme Cecatti; Anke Diemert; Rogelio Gonzalez; Kurt Hecher; Lisa N Jensen; Synnøve L Johnsen; Torvid Kiserud; Alka Kriplani; Pisake Lumbiganon; Ann Tabor; Sameera A Talegawkar; Antoinette Tshefu; Daniel Wojdyla; Lawrence Platt
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2014-05-02       Impact factor: 3.007

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.