Literature DB >> 1612664

Foetal growth parameters--clinical versus ultrasonographic.

M Berry1, K J Coyaji, M P Gogoi, B S Kodkany, K S Parikh, D Patel, M Y Rawal, P C Sengupta, V Walvekar, B S Dhillon.   

Abstract

The study was conducted in 2831 pregnant women with no diagnosed complication at the time of registration to obtain normal foetal growth pattern for clinical and ultrasonographic parameters. Normal values for maternal weight, fundal height and abdominal girth for clinical and biparietal diameter, abdominal circumferences and femoral length for ultrasonographic parameters are presented. Clinical and ultrasonographic parameters were compared for their efficacy in prediction of low birth weight. Neither clinical nor ultrasonographic parameters were found to be satisfactory in identifying the foetus at risk of low birth weight. It has been found that clinical parameters for routine monitoring are as effective as ultrasonographic parameters and have the added advantage of being easily replicable at the peripheral level of health care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1612664     DOI: 10.1007/bf02760907

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Pediatr        ISSN: 0019-5456            Impact factor:   1.967


  7 in total

1.  Ultrasonic measurement of foetal parameters in normal pregnancy & in intrauterine growth retardation.

Authors:  M Sood; V Hingorani; N Kashyap; S Kumar; M Berry; S Bhargava
Journal:  Indian J Med Res       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 2.375

2.  Fetal asphyxia during the intrapartum period in intrauterine growth-retarded infants.

Authors:  J A Low; R W Boston; S R Pancham
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1972-06-01       Impact factor: 8.661

3.  Intrauterine growth retardation.

Authors:  H Bard
Journal:  Clin Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1970-09       Impact factor: 2.190

4.  Routine ultrasound screening for antenatal detection of intrauterine growth retardation.

Authors:  S L Warsof; D J Cooper; D Little; S Campbell
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 7.661

5.  Normal range curves for the intrauterine growth of the biparietal diameter.

Authors:  P H Persson; L Grennert; G Gennser; B Gullberg
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand Suppl       Date:  1978

6.  Fetal head and abdominal circumferences: I. Evaluation of measurement errors.

Authors:  R L Deter; R B Harrist; F P Hadlock; R J Carpenter
Journal:  J Clin Ultrasound       Date:  1982-10       Impact factor: 0.910

7.  Antenatal screening by measurement of symphysis-fundus height.

Authors:  J P Calvert; E E Crean; R G Newcombe; J F Pearson
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1982-09-25
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.