Literature DB >> 41087

Investigation of narcotics and antitussives using drug discrimination techniques.

D A Overton, S K Batta.   

Abstract

Rats learned drug discriminations in a shock-escape T-maze task. They were trained to turn right in the maze following injection of a drug (D) and left when no injection (N) was given. Number of training sessions before criterion performance (STC) was used to indicate degree of discriminability of the training drug. STC decreased monotonically as dosage increased, and reached a minimum of 3 to 26 with various agonists. Most agonists were not highly discriminable. Daily maintenance injections of morphine, 200 to 600 mg/kg, increased the STC of morphine, 15 mg/kg, significantly, but complete tolerance to discriminable drug actions was not observed. After rats discriminated D vs. N, they were tested with novel drugs to determine which would elicit D choices. Most morphine-like agonists substituted for one another during substitution tests; the tested agonists included alphaprodine, codeine, fentanyl, heroin, meperidine, methadone, morphine, piminodine and propoxyphene. In a few instances, one of these agonists failed to substitute for another. Naloxone and naltrexone antagonized the discriminable effects of morphine. Cyclazocine, levallorphan, naltrexone, dextromethorphan, ethoheptazine and the narcotic agonists did not substitute for one another, suggesting that six dissimilar discriminable effects were produced by these drugs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1979        PMID: 41087      PMCID: PMC8331839     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther        ISSN: 0022-3565            Impact factor:   4.030


  7 in total

1.  Environmental modification of tolerance to morphine discriminative stimulus properties in rats.

Authors:  C A Sannerud; A M Young
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 4.530

2.  Similarity of the discriminative stimulus effects of ketamine, cyclazocine, and dextrorphan in the pigeon.

Authors:  S Herling; E H Coale; D W Hein; G Winger; J H Woods
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 4.530

3.  Comparison of the degree of discriminability of various drugs using the T-maze drug discrimination paradigm.

Authors:  D A Overton
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 4.  Role of training dose in drug discrimination: a review.

Authors:  Ian P Stolerman; Emma Childs; Matthew M Ford; Kathleen A Grant
Journal:  Behav Pharmacol       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 2.293

5.  Subjective, behavioral and physiological responses to intravenous meperidine in healthy volunteers.

Authors:  J P Zacny; J L Lichtor; W Binstock; D W Coalson; T Cutter; D C Flemming; B Glosten
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 4.530

6.  Discriminative stimulus properties of naloxone in Long-Evans rats: assessment with the conditioned taste aversion baseline of drug discrimination learning.

Authors:  Catherine M Davis; Glenn W Stevenson; Fernando Cañadas; Thomas Ullrich; Kenner C Rice; Anthony L Riley
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2008-07-02       Impact factor: 4.530

7.  A taste aversion model of drug discrimination learning: training drug and condition influence rate of learning, sensitivity and drug specificity.

Authors:  T V Jaeger; R F Mucha
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 4.530

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.