Literature DB >> 6806090

Concerning the need for more sophisticated animal models in sensory behavioral toxicology.

W C Stebbins.   

Abstract

It is necessary but not sufficient to develop laboratory animal models in sensory behavioral toxicology for screening toxic substances and for the analysis of sensory impairment at threshold levels of stimulation. It is important to develop more thorough and quantitative tests of impairment which in their greater complexity more accurately reflect the conditions and environmental demands of day-to-day life. Such greater complexity in stimulus conditions and behavior may also aid in monitoring not merely the state of the receptor organ but more central nervous processes which are the focus of assault by many known toxic substances. Techniques are described for studying such acoustic behaviors as intensity discrimination and frequency selectivity in guinea pig and monkey by use of operant conditioning procedures coupled with sensory testing (psychophysical) methods. Impaired auditory selectively and discrimination is shown to be correlated with histopathological changes in the inner ear. Slight modification of these procedures in animals may be used to investigate acoustically more intricate behaviors such as sound localization and the perception of frequency modulated acoustic signals as elements of speech and communication sounds.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1982        PMID: 6806090      PMCID: PMC1568976          DOI: 10.1289/ehp.824477

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Health Perspect        ISSN: 0091-6765            Impact factor:   9.031


  9 in total

1.  Comparative behavioral toxicology.

Authors:  W C Stebbins; D B Moody
Journal:  Neurobehav Toxicol       Date:  1979

2.  On the existence in human auditory pathways of channels selectively tuned to the modulation present in frequency-modulated tones.

Authors:  R H Kay; D R Matthews
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1972-09       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  Effects of auditory cortical lesions on discriminations of rising and falling frequency-modulated tones.

Authors:  J B Kelly; I C Whitfield
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1971-09       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Separate auditory channels for unidirectional frequency modulation and unidirectional amplitude modulation.

Authors:  B W Tansley; D Regan
Journal:  Sens Processes       Date:  1979-06

5.  Speech sound discrimination by monkeys and humans.

Authors:  J M Sinnott; M D Beecher; D B Moody; W C Stebbins
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1976-09       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Auditory intensity discrimination after selective loss of cochlear outer hair cells.

Authors:  C A Prosen; D B Moody; W C Stebbins; J E Hawkins
Journal:  Science       Date:  1981-06-12       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Evidence for direction-specific channels in the processing of frequency modulation.

Authors:  R B Gardner; J P Wilson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1979-09       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 8.  Perception of conspecific vocalizations by Japanese macaques. Evidence for selective attention and neural lateralization.

Authors:  M D Beecher; M R Petersen; S R Zoloth; D B Moody; W C Stebbins
Journal:  Brain Behav Evol       Date:  1979       Impact factor: 1.808

9.  Psychophysical tuning curves and auditory thresholds after hair cell damage in the chinchilla.

Authors:  A Ryan; P Dallos; T McGee
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1979-08       Impact factor: 1.840

  9 in total
  6 in total

Review 1.  Animal behavioral methods in neurotoxicity assessment: SGOMSEC joint report.

Authors:  B Kulig; E Alleva; G Bignami; J Cohn; D Cory-Slechta; V Landa; J O'Donoghue; D Peakall
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 9.031

2.  Changes in audiometric threshold and frequency selectivity correlate with cochlear histopathology in macaque monkeys with permanent noise-induced hearing loss.

Authors:  Jane A Burton; Chase A Mackey; Kaitlyn S MacDonald; Troy A Hackett; Ramnarayan Ramachandran
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2020-09-24       Impact factor: 3.208

3.  Correlations between cochlear pathophysiology and behavioral measures of temporal and spatial processing in noise exposed macaques.

Authors:  Chase A Mackey; Jennifer McCrate; Kaitlyn S MacDonald; Jessica Feller; Leslie Liberman; M Charles Liberman; Troy A Hackett; Ramnarayan Ramachandran
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2020-12-17       Impact factor: 3.208

Review 4.  Methods to identify and characterize developmental neurotoxicity for human health risk assessment. I: behavioral effects.

Authors:  D A Cory-Slechta; K M Crofton; J A Foran; J F Ross; L P Sheets; B Weiss; B Mileson
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 5.  Comprehensive neurotoxicity assessment.

Authors:  B M Kulig
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 6.  Use of the guinea pig in studies on the development and prevention of acquired sensorineural hearing loss, with an emphasis on noise.

Authors:  Gaëlle Naert; Marie-Pierre Pasdelou; Colleen G Le Prell
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 2.482

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.