Literature DB >> 11250808

Methods to identify and characterize developmental neurotoxicity for human health risk assessment. I: behavioral effects.

D A Cory-Slechta1, K M Crofton, J A Foran, J F Ross, L P Sheets, B Weiss, B Mileson.   

Abstract

Alterations in nervous system function after exposure to a developmental neurotoxicant may be identified and characterized using neurobehavioral methods. A number of methods can evaluate alterations in sensory, motor, and cognitive functions in laboratory animals exposed to toxicants during nervous system development. Fundamental issues underlying proper use and interpretation of these methods include a) consideration of the scientific goal in experimental design, b) selection of an appropriate animal model, c) expertise of the investigator, d) adequate statistical analysis, and e) proper data interpretation. Strengths and weaknesses of the assessment methods include sensitivity, selectivity, practicality, and variability. Research could improve current behavioral methods by providing a better understanding of the relationship between alterations in motor function and changes in the underlying structure of these systems. Research is also needed to develop simple and sensitive assays for use in screening assessments of sensory and cognitive function. Assessment methods are being developed to examine other nervous system functions, including social behavior, autonomic processes, and biologic rhythms. Social behaviors are modified by many classes of developmental neurotoxicants and hormonally active compounds that may act either through neuroendocrine mechanisms or by directly influencing brain morphology or neurochemistry. Autonomic and thermoregulatory functions have been the province of physiologists and neurobiologists rather than toxicologists, but this may change as developmental neurotoxicology progresses and toxicologists apply techniques developed by other disciplines to examine changes in function after toxicant exposure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11250808      PMCID: PMC1240545          DOI: 10.1289/ehp.01109s179

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Health Perspect        ISSN: 0091-6765            Impact factor:   9.031


  102 in total

1.  Exposure to lead during development alters aggressive behavior in golden hamsters.

Authors:  Y Delville
Journal:  Neurotoxicol Teratol       Date:  1999 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.763

2.  Towards a cognitive phenotype for autism: increased prevalence of executive dysfunction and superior spatial span amongst siblings of children with autism.

Authors:  C Hughes; M H Plumet; M Leboyer
Journal:  J Child Psychol Psychiatry       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 8.982

3.  Appetitive and consummatory sexual behaviors of female rats in bilevel chambers. I. A correlational and factor analysis and the effects of ovarian hormones.

Authors:  J G Pfaus; W J Smith; C B Coopersmith
Journal:  Horm Behav       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 3.587

Review 4.  Expanded clinical observations in toxicity studies: historical perspectives and contemporary issues.

Authors:  J F Ross; J L Mattsson; A S Fix
Journal:  Regul Toxicol Pharmacol       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 3.271

5.  Microinfusion of cocaine into the medial preoptic area or nucleus accumbens transiently impairs maternal behavior in the rat.

Authors:  E M Vernotica; J S Rosenblatt; J I Morrell
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 1.912

6.  Pfiesteria toxin and learning performance.

Authors:  E D Levin; B B Simon; D E Schmechel; H B Glasgow; N J Deamer-Melia; J M Burkholder; V C Moser; K Jensen; G J Harry
Journal:  Neurotoxicol Teratol       Date:  1999 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.763

7.  Neuroanatomical basis of maternal memory in postpartum rats: selective role for the nucleus accumbens.

Authors:  A Lee; M Li; J Watchus; A S Fleming
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 1.912

8.  Executive function and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: stimulant medication and better executive function performance in children.

Authors:  S Kempton; A Vance; P Maruff; E Luk; J Costin; C Pantelis
Journal:  Psychol Med       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 7.723

9.  Site and behavioral specificity of periaqueductal gray lesions on postpartum sexual, maternal, and aggressive behaviors in rats.

Authors:  J S Lonstein; J M Stern
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1998-08-31       Impact factor: 3.252

10.  Prenatal sulfur dioxide exposure induces changes in the behavior of adult male mice during agonistic encounters.

Authors:  M Fiore; S Petruzzi; G Dell'Omo; E Alleva
Journal:  Neurotoxicol Teratol       Date:  1998 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.763

View more
  13 in total

Review 1.  Is decabromodiphenyl ether (BDE-209) a developmental neurotoxicant?

Authors:  Lucio G Costa; Gennaro Giordano
Journal:  Neurotoxicology       Date:  2010-12-21       Impact factor: 4.294

2.  Potential frameworks to support evaluation of mechanistic data for developmental neurotoxicity outcomes: A symposium report.

Authors:  Laura M Carlson; Frances A Champagne; Deborah A Cory-Slechta; Laura Dishaw; Elaine Faustman; William Mundy; Deborah Segal; Christina Sobin; Carol Starkey; Michele Taylor; Susan L Makris; Andrew Kraft
Journal:  Neurotoxicol Teratol       Date:  2020-02-14       Impact factor: 3.763

Review 3.  Fatigue and sleep during cancer and chemotherapy: translational rodent models.

Authors:  Maria Ray; Laura Q Rogers; Rita A Trammell; Linda A Toth
Journal:  Comp Med       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 0.982

4.  The effects of dietary treatment with S-equol on learning and memory processes in middle-aged ovariectomized rats.

Authors:  Steven L Neese; Samantha L Pisani; Daniel R Doerge; William G Helferich; Estatira Sepehr; Amar G Chittiboyina; Sateesh Chandra Kumar Rotte; Troy J Smillie; Ikhlas A Khan; Donna L Korol; Susan L Schantz
Journal:  Neurotoxicol Teratol       Date:  2013-12-22       Impact factor: 3.763

5.  Working memory in bisphenol-A treated middle-aged ovariectomized rats.

Authors:  Steven L Neese; Suren B Bandara; Susan L Schantz
Journal:  Neurotoxicol Teratol       Date:  2013-01-20       Impact factor: 3.763

6.  Introduction: reviews of environmental health, 2001.

Authors:  T J Goehl
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 9.031

7.  Developmental neurotoxicity: some old and new issues.

Authors:  Gennaro Giordano; Lucio G Costa
Journal:  ISRN Toxicol       Date:  2012-06-24

Review 8.  Issues in the design, analysis, and application of rodent developmental neurotoxicology studies.

Authors:  Charles V Vorhees; Michael T Williams
Journal:  Neurotoxicol Teratol       Date:  2021-07-10       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 9.  A retrospective performance assessment of the developmental neurotoxicity study in support of OECD test guideline 426.

Authors:  Susan L Makris; Kathleen Raffaele; Sandra Allen; Wayne J Bowers; Ulla Hass; Enrico Alleva; Gemma Calamandrei; Larry Sheets; Patric Amcoff; Nathalie Delrue; Kevin M Crofton
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2008-08-12       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 10.  Comparable measures of cognitive function in human infants and laboratory animals to identify environmental health risks to children.

Authors:  Carolyn Sharbaugh; Susan Marie Viet; Alexa Fraser; Suzanne B McMaster
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 9.031

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.