Literature DB >> 6794078

The ethanol stimulus in rats with differing ethanol preferences.

J L York.   

Abstract

Alcohol-accepting (AA) and alcohol-nonaccepting (ANA) rats (Alko, Finland) were tested for their ability to master a shock-motivated (0.6 mA scrambled AC current) T-maze discrimination in which IP injections of ethanol (1.0 g/kg, 10% w/v in saline, 20-min latency) and, on alternate days, equivolume saline were employed as a discriminative stimuli signalling the safety of right or left goal compartments. ANA rats reached the criterion level of performance (eight of ten correct first-trial responses) more quickly than did AA rats (12.3 +/- 2.3 versus 31.4 +/- 7.7 sessions, P less than 0.01) and also maintained a superior level of performance through-out the course of the experiment, suggesting that ethanol may have been a more salient cue for ANA rats than for AA rats. Injections of acetaldehyde (0.1-0.25 g/kg, 1.0-2.5% w/v in saline) produced ethanol-appropriate responding to a greater extent in ANA rats than in AA rats, indicating that the actions of acetaldehyde may contribute importantly to the stimulus condition produced by the injection of ethanol in ANA rats. Sodium pentobarbital (10.0 g/kg) was equally effective in mimicking the action of ethanol in both AA and ANA rats. AA and ANA rats did not differ significantly in the impairment of motor performance produced by a range of ethanol doses, suggesting that differences in stimuli related to motor impairment do not contribute to the differences observed in the cue value of ethanol for AA and ANA rats.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1981        PMID: 6794078     DOI: 10.1007/BF00432743

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)        ISSN: 0033-3158            Impact factor:   4.530


  10 in total

Review 1.  Experimental methods for the study of state-dependent learning.

Authors:  D A Overton
Journal:  Fed Proc       Date:  1974-07

2.  Classification of drugs according to their discriminable effects in rats.

Authors:  H Barry
Journal:  Fed Proc       Date:  1974-07

3.  Enzyme activities and ethanol preference in mice.

Authors:  J R Sheppard; P Albersheim; G E McClearn
Journal:  Biochem Genet       Date:  1968-11       Impact factor: 1.890

4.  Genetic and biochemical correlates of alcohol preference in mice.

Authors:  K Schlesinger
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  1966-01       Impact factor: 18.112

5.  Efficacy of ethanol as a discriminative stimulus in ethanol-preferring and ethanol-nonpreferring rats.

Authors:  J L York
Journal:  Experientia       Date:  1978-02-15

6.  Intoxicating effects of three aliphatic alcohols and barbital on two rat strains genetically selected for their ethanol intake.

Authors:  A Malila
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  1978-02       Impact factor: 3.533

7.  The aversive effect of acetaldehyde on alcohol drinking behavior in the rat.

Authors:  C J Eriksson
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  1980-01       Impact factor: 3.455

8.  Ethanol and acetaldehyde metabolism in rat strains genetically selected for their ethanol preference.

Authors:  C J Eriksson
Journal:  Biochem Pharmacol       Date:  1973-09-15       Impact factor: 5.858

9.  Consumption of intoxicating beverages by rats and mice exhibiting high and low preferences for ethanol.

Authors:  J L York
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  1981-08       Impact factor: 3.533

10.  An inborn alcohol tolerance in alcohol-preferring rats. The lack of relationship between tolerance to ethanol and the brain microsomal (Na+K+) ATPase activity.

Authors:  P Nikander; L Pekkanen
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1977-03-16       Impact factor: 4.530

  10 in total
  4 in total

1.  Delivery of nicotine in an extract of a smokeless tobacco product reduces its reinforcement-attenuating and discriminative stimulus effects in rats.

Authors:  Andrew C Harris; Irina Stepanov; Paul R Pentel; Mark G Lesage
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2011-09-30       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 2.  Do initial responses to drugs predict future use or abuse?

Authors:  Harriet de Wit; Tamara J Phillips
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2012-04-21       Impact factor: 8.989

Review 3.  Drug discrimination by humans compared to nonhumans: current status and future directions.

Authors:  J B Kamien; W K Bickel; J R Hughes; S T Higgins; B J Smith
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 4.530

4.  Behavioral and biochemical evidence of the role of acetaldehyde in the motivational effects of ethanol.

Authors:  Alessandra T Peana; Elio Acquas
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2013-07-15       Impact factor: 3.558

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.