Literature DB >> 6791901

Meiosis in Drosophila melanogaster. I. Chromosome identification and kinetochore microtubule numbers during the first and second meiotic divisions in males.

H P Lin, J G Ault, K Church.   

Abstract

Individual bivalents or chromosomes have been identified in Drosophila melanogaster spermatocytes at metaphase I, anaphase I, metaphase II and anaphase II in electron micrographs of serial sections. Identification was based on a combination of chromosome volume analysis, bivalent topology, and kinetochore position. - Kinetochore microtubule numbers have been obtained for the identified chromosomes at all four meiotic stages. Average numbers in D. melanogaster are relatively low compared to reported numbers of other higher eukaryotes. There is no differences in kinetochore microtubule numbers within a stage despite a large (approximately tenfold) difference in chromosome volume between the largest and the smallest chromosome. A comparison between the two meiotic metaphases (metaphase I and metaphase II) reveals that metaphase I kinetochores possess twice as many microtubules as metaphase II kinetochores. - Other microtubules in addition to those that end on or penetrate the kinetochore are found in the vicinity of the kinetochore. These microtubules penetrate the chromosome rather than the kinetochore proper and are more numerous at metaphase I than at the other division stages.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1981        PMID: 6791901     DOI: 10.1007/BF00328276

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chromosoma        ISSN: 0009-5915            Impact factor:   4.316


  21 in total

1.  Non-Disjunction as Proof of the Chromosome Theory of Heredity.

Authors:  C B Bridges
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1916-01       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Ultrastructural studies of spermatogenesis in Drosophila melanogaster Meigen.

Authors:  S W Rasmussen
Journal:  Z Zellforsch Mikrosk Anat       Date:  1973-06-20

3.  Mutants affecting meiosis in natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  L Sandler; D L Lindsley; B Nicoletti; G Trippa
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1968-11       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 4.  The genetic control of meiosis.

Authors:  B S Baker; A T Carpenter; M S Esposito; R E Esposito; L Sandler
Journal:  Annu Rev Genet       Date:  1976       Impact factor: 16.830

5.  A possible role for the synaptonemal complex in chiasma maintenance.

Authors:  M P Maguire
Journal:  Exp Cell Res       Date:  1978-03-15       Impact factor: 3.905

6.  Genetic analysis of sex chromosomal meiotic mutants in Drosophilia melanogaster.

Authors:  B S Baker; A T Carpenter
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1972-06       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Electron microscopy of spermatocytes previously studied in life: methods and some observations on micromanipulated chromosomes.

Authors:  R B Nicklas; B R Brinkley; D A Pepper; D F Kubai; G K Rickards
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  1979-02       Impact factor: 5.285

8.  Microtubule initiation at kinetochores and centrosomes in lysed mitotic cells. Inhibition of site-specific nucleation by tubulin antibody.

Authors:  D A Pepper; B R Brinkley
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1979-08       Impact factor: 10.539

9.  Improvements in epoxy resin embedding methods.

Authors:  J H LUFT
Journal:  J Biophys Biochem Cytol       Date:  1961-02

10.  Cell division in two large pennate diatoms Hantzschia and Nitzschia III. A new proposal for kinetochore function during prometaphase.

Authors:  D H Tippit; J D Pickett-Heaps; R Leslie
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1980-08       Impact factor: 10.539

View more
  17 in total

1.  CENP-E is essential for reliable bioriented spindle attachment, but chromosome alignment can be achieved via redundant mechanisms in mammalian cells.

Authors:  B F McEwen; G K Chan; B Zubrowski; M S Savoian; M T Sauer; T J Yen
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 4.138

2.  Relevance of kinetochore size and microtubule-binding capacity for stable chromosome attachment during mitosis in PtK1 cells.

Authors:  B F McEwen; Y Ding; A B Heagle
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 5.239

3.  Centromeric dots in crane-fly spermatocytes: meiotic maturation and malorientation.

Authors:  M A Janicke; J R LaFountain
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 4.316

4.  Kinetochore microtubules and chromosome movement during prometaphase in Drosophila melanogaster spermatocytes studied in life and with the electron microscope.

Authors:  K Church; H P Lin
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 4.316

Review 5.  Meiosis in Drosophila: seeing is believing.

Authors:  T L Orr-Weaver
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1995-11-07       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Bivalent behavior in Drosophila melanogaster males containing the In(1)sc4Lsc8RX chromosome.

Authors:  J G Ault; H P Lin
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 4.316

7.  Meiosis in Drosophila melanogaster. IV. The conjunctive mechanism of the XY bivalent.

Authors:  J G Ault; H P Lin; K Church
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 4.316

8.  Meiosis in Drosophila melanogaster, III. The effect of orientation disruptor (ord) on gonial mitotic and the meiotic divisions in males.

Authors:  H P Lin; K Church
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1982-12       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Structure, mitotic and meiotic behaviour, and stability of centromere-like elements devoid of chromosome arms in the fly Megaselia scalaris (Phoridae).

Authors:  K W Wolf; H G Mertl; W Traut
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 4.316

Review 10.  Finding the middle ground: how kinetochores power chromosome congression.

Authors:  Geert J P L Kops; Adrian T Saurin; Patrick Meraldi
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2010-03-16       Impact factor: 9.261

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.