Literature DB >> 6780692

Cost-benefit analysis and medical ethics.

G H Mooney.   

Abstract

The issue of assessing priorities is one that has become the subject of much debate in the National Health Service particularly in the wake of various documents on priorities from central Government. It has become even more so with the prospect of real cuts in expenditure. Economists claim that their science, or perhaps more accurately art can assist in determining not only how best to achieve various ends but also whether and to what extent competing objectives should be pursued. Such choices cannot be made in the absence of some ethical considerations and it is important that health service decision makers (and in particular the medical profession) are aware if the relationship between economics (and especially cost-benefit analysis) and medical ethics.

Keywords:  National Health Service

Mesh:

Year:  1980        PMID: 6780692      PMCID: PMC1154840          DOI: 10.1136/jme.6.4.177

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Ethics        ISSN: 0306-6800            Impact factor:   2.903


  1 in total

1.  Choosing priorities.

Authors:  J A Gray
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  1979-06       Impact factor: 2.903

  1 in total
  8 in total

1.  Risk-benefit analysis: from a logical point of view.

Authors:  Georg Spielthenner
Journal:  J Bioeth Inq       Date:  2012-03-21       Impact factor: 1.352

2.  Psychoanalysis and analytic psychotherapy in the NHS--a problem for medical ethics.

Authors:  G Wilkinson
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  1986-06       Impact factor: 2.903

3.  Beneficence: doing good for others.

Authors:  R Gillon
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1985-07-06

Review 4.  Good quality quality? Some methodological issues.

Authors:  C E Selai; R M Rosser
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 5.344

5.  Measuring the benefits of screening for open neural tube defects.

Authors:  J B Henderson
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1982-09       Impact factor: 3.710

6.  Dealing with the brain-damaged old--dignity before sanctity.

Authors:  G S Robertson
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  1982-12       Impact factor: 2.903

7.  What are the benefits and risks of using return on investment to defend public health programs?

Authors:  Astrid Brousselle; Tarik Benmarhnia; Lynda Benhadj
Journal:  Prev Med Rep       Date:  2016-01-19

8.  An economic analysis of chromosome testing in couples with children who have structural chromosome abnormalities.

Authors:  Kittiphong Thiboonboon; Wantanee Kulpeng; Yot Teerawattananon
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-06-19       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.